• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

正畸微螺钉的生物力学特性。一项体外研究。

Biomechanical properties of orthodontic miniscrews. An in-vitro study.

作者信息

Florvaag Britta, Kneuertz Peter, Lazar Frank, Koebke Jürgen, Zöller Joachim E, Braumann Bert, Mischkowski Robert A

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

J Orofac Orthop. 2010 Jan;71(1):53-67. doi: 10.1007/s00056-010-9933-y. Epub 2010 Feb 5.

DOI:10.1007/s00056-010-9933-y
PMID:20135250
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Comparing five commercially-available miniscrew types for skeletal anchorage with regard to the biomechanical properties influencing their primary stability.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Included in this study was a total of 196 self-tapping and self-drilling miniscrews having a diameter of 2 mm (or the largest possible diameter of the manufacturer in question), a thread shaft length of 10 mm, or the longest miniscrew supplied by the manufacturers. The screw types tested were the FAMI 2, Orlus mini-implant, T.I.T.A.N. Pin, tomas-pin and Vector TAS. Insertion and loosening torque measurements, and pullout tests in axial (0 degrees), 20 degrees and 40 degrees directions, as well as test series with and without pilot hole drilling were performed. Bovine femoral heads having the same bone mineral density (BMD) were used as bone-testing material.

RESULTS

Higher insertion torques were found for the cylindrical FAMI 2 screw, the conical Orlus mini-implant and the Vector TAS screw (with mean values of 39.2 Ncm, 32.1 Ncm and 49.5 Ncm) than for the cylindrical T.I.T.A.N. pin and tomas-pin. Insertion without predrilling led the insertion torques of all five screws to rise significantly. We noted statistically significant differences among the five screws in the pullout tests. Those highly significant differences at axial (0 degrees) and 20 degrees angles were not apparent at the 40 degrees pullout angle. Compared with the pullout forces (load) in the axial direction, the cylindrical screws' load values decreased markedly according to the angle (by up to -46.6%). The reduction in pullout force in conjunction with an increasing angle was much less pronounced in the conical screws (-0.8% to -29.0%). The tomas-pin demonstrated the highest pullout force and stiffness values throughout the tests. A total of five tomas-pins, two Orlus mini-implants and one FAMI 2 screw fractured during the pullout tests.

CONCLUSIONS

Results from our insertion torque measurements suggest that a conical screw design will provide greater primary stability than cylindrical screw types. The cylindrical screw design's superiority was evident in the pullout tests. All the miniscrews' primary stability rose after drill-free insertion. The tomas-pin screws, although biomechanically superior to the other screws, were most prone to fracture.

摘要

目的

比较五种市售微型螺钉在骨骼锚固方面影响其初始稳定性的生物力学性能。

材料与方法

本研究共纳入196颗自攻自钻微型螺钉,直径为2mm(或相关制造商提供的最大直径),螺纹轴长度为10mm,或为制造商提供的最长微型螺钉。测试的螺钉类型有FAMI 2、Orlus微型种植体、T.I.T.A.N. Pin、tomas-pin和Vector TAS。进行了插入和松动扭矩测量,以及在轴向(0度)、20度和40度方向的拔出试验,还进行了有和没有预钻孔的测试系列。使用具有相同骨密度(BMD)的牛股骨头作为骨测试材料。

结果

圆柱形的FAMI 2螺钉、锥形的Orlus微型种植体和Vector TAS螺钉的插入扭矩较高(平均值分别为39.2Ncm、32.1Ncm和49.5Ncm),高于圆柱形的T.I.T.A.N. Pin和tomas-pin。不进行预钻孔插入会使所有五种螺钉的插入扭矩显著增加。在拔出试验中,我们注意到五种螺钉之间存在统计学上的显著差异。在轴向(0度)和20度角度的那些高度显著差异在40度拔出角度时并不明显。与轴向拔出力(载荷)相比,圆柱形螺钉的载荷值根据角度显著降低(降幅高达-46.6%)。锥形螺钉在拔出力随角度增加时的降低程度要小得多(-0.8%至-29.0%)。在整个测试过程中,tomas-pin表现出最高的拔出力和刚度值。在拔出试验中,共有5颗tomas-pin、2颗Orlus微型种植体和1颗FAMI 2螺钉发生断裂。

结论

我们的插入扭矩测量结果表明,锥形螺钉设计比圆柱形螺钉类型能提供更大的初始稳定性。圆柱形螺钉设计在拔出试验中的优势明显。所有微型螺钉在无钻孔插入后的初始稳定性都有所提高。tomas-pin螺钉虽然在生物力学上优于其他螺钉,但最容易发生断裂。

相似文献

1
Biomechanical properties of orthodontic miniscrews. An in-vitro study.正畸微螺钉的生物力学特性。一项体外研究。
J Orofac Orthop. 2010 Jan;71(1):53-67. doi: 10.1007/s00056-010-9933-y. Epub 2010 Feb 5.
2
Biomechanical comparison of four different miniscrew types for skeletal anchorage in the mandibulo-maxillary area.下颌-上颌区域四种不同微型螺钉用于骨锚固的生物力学比较。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Oct;37(10):948-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2008.07.017. Epub 2008 Sep 6.
3
Insertion Torques of Self-Drilling Mini-Implants in Simulated Mandibular Bone: Assessment of Potential for Implant Fracture.模拟下颌骨中自攻微型种植体的植入扭矩:种植体骨折可能性评估
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 May-Jun;31(3):e57-64. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4427.
4
Fracture resistance of commonly used self-drilling orthodontic mini-implants.常用自攻型正畸微型种植体的抗折性能
Angle Orthod. 2015 Jan;85(1):26-32. doi: 10.2319/112213-860.1.
5
Experimental investigation of the fracture torque of orthodontic anchorage screws.正畸支抗螺钉断裂扭矩的实验研究
J Orofac Orthop. 2016 Jul;77(4):272-80. doi: 10.1007/s00056-016-0032-6. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
6
Comparative evaluation of insertion torque and mechanical stability for self-tapping and self-drilling orthodontic miniscrews - an in vitro study.自攻型和自钻型正畸微螺钉植入扭矩与机械稳定性的比较评估——一项体外研究
Head Face Med. 2017 May 30;13(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13005-017-0143-3.
7
Placement and removal torque values of orthodontic miniscrew implants.正畸微螺钉种植体的植入扭矩和去除扭矩值。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 May;139(5):669-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.11.017.
8
Effects of thread shape on the pullout strength of miniscrews.螺纹形状对微螺钉拔出强度的影响。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012 Aug;142(2):186-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.03.023.
9
An in vitro investigation of peak insertion torque values of six commercially available mini-implants.六种市售微型种植体的峰值植入扭矩值的体外研究。
Eur J Orthod. 2011 Dec;33(6):660-6. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq129. Epub 2010 Dec 24.
10
Influence of geometric design characteristics on primary stability of orthodontic miniscrews.正畸微螺钉的几何设计特征对初始稳定性的影响。
J Orofac Orthop. 2018 May;79(3):191-203. doi: 10.1007/s00056-018-0131-7. Epub 2018 Apr 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Dimensions Define Stability: Insertion Torque of Orthodontic Mini-Implants: A Comparative In Vitro Study.尺寸决定稳定性:正畸微种植体的植入扭矩:一项体外对比研究。
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 5;14(5):1752. doi: 10.3390/jcm14051752.
2
Pull-Out Strength of Orthodontic Miniscrews in the Temporal Bone.正畸微螺钉在颞骨中的拔出力。
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Jan-Dec;53:19160216241248669. doi: 10.1177/19160216241248669.
3
Success rates of single-thread and double-thread orthodontic miniscrews in the maxillary arch.上颌牙弓中单螺纹和双螺纹正畸微螺钉的成功率。

本文引用的文献

1
Pre-drilling force and insertion torques during orthodontic mini-implant insertion in relation to root contact.正畸微型种植体植入过程中与牙根接触相关的预钻孔力和植入扭矩。
J Orofac Orthop. 2008 Jan;69(1):51-8. doi: 10.1007/s00056-008-0726-5.
2
Impact of implant design on primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants.种植体设计对正畸微型种植体初期稳定性的影响。
J Orofac Orthop. 2008 Jan;69(1):42-50. doi: 10.1007/s00056-008-0727-4.
3
The use of miniscrew implants for temporary skeletal anchorage in orthodontics: a comprehensive review.
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Feb 5;24(1):191. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-03866-x.
4
The effect of different orthodontic mini-implant brands and geometry on primary stability (an in vitro study).不同正畸微型种植体品牌和几何形状对初期稳定性的影响(一项体外研究)
Heliyon. 2023 Sep 6;9(9):e19858. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19858. eCollection 2023 Sep.
5
Revisiting the Complications of Orthodontic Miniscrew.重新审视正畸微螺钉的并发症。
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Aug 1;2022:8720412. doi: 10.1155/2022/8720412. eCollection 2022.
6
Bone quality affects stability of orthodontic miniscrews.骨质量影响正畸微螺钉的稳定性。
Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 18;12(1):2849. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-06851-y.
7
Effect of Different Head Hole Position on the Rotational Resistance and Stability of Orthodontic Miniscrews: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Study.不同头部孔位对正畸微螺钉旋转阻力和稳定性的影响:三维有限元研究。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 May 30;21(11):3798. doi: 10.3390/s21113798.
8
Evaluation of Cortical Bone Microdamage and Primary Stability of Orthodontic Miniscrew Using a Human Bone Analogue.使用人工骨模拟物评估正畸微螺钉的皮质骨微损伤和初始稳定性。
Materials (Basel). 2021 Apr 7;14(8):1825. doi: 10.3390/ma14081825.
9
The effect of social media on patient acceptance of temporary anchorage devices.社交媒体对患者接受临时锚固装置的影响。
Angle Orthod. 2021 May 1;91(3):363-370. doi: 10.2319/071020-618.1.
10
Distalization with a modified C-palatal plate for severe upper crowding and a missing lower incisor.使用改良的C形腭板进行远中移动,用于治疗严重的上颌牙列拥挤和下颌切牙缺失。
Korean J Orthod. 2020 Jan;50(1):52-62. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2020.50.1.52. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
正畸中微型螺钉种植体用于临时骨骼锚固的研究综述
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007 May;103(5):e6-15. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.11.022. Epub 2007 Feb 21.
4
Primary stability of a conical implant and a hybrid, cylindric screw-type implant in vitro.锥形种植体和混合式圆柱形螺旋种植体在体外的初期稳定性。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006 Jul-Aug;21(4):560-6.
5
The effect of bone tunnel dilation versus extraction drilling on the initial fixation strength of press-fit anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.骨隧道扩张与拔出钻孔对压配式前交叉韧带重建初始固定强度的影响。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2007 Nov;127(9):801-7. doi: 10.1007/s00402-006-0206-6. Epub 2006 Aug 3.
6
Biomechanical and histomorphometric analyses of monocortical screws at placement and 6 weeks postinsertion.单皮质螺钉置入时及置入后6周的生物力学和组织形态计量学分析。
J Oral Implantol. 2006;32(3):110-6. doi: 10.1563/767.1.
7
[Stability of the miniscrew implant during healing period].[微型螺钉种植体在愈合期的稳定性]
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2006 Apr;41(4):226-7.
8
Parameters affecting primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants.影响正畸微型种植体初期稳定性的参数。
J Orofac Orthop. 2006 May;67(3):162-74. doi: 10.1007/s00056-006-0611-z.
9
"Safe zones": a guide for miniscrew positioning in the maxillary and mandibular arch.“安全区”:上颌和下颌牙弓微螺钉定位指南
Angle Orthod. 2006 Mar;76(2):191-7. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0191:SZAGFM]2.0.CO;2.
10
A study of some factors which affect the strength of screws and their insertion and holding power in bone.一项关于影响螺钉强度及其在骨中植入和固定力的若干因素的研究。
J Biomech. 1968 Dec;1(4):279-302. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(68)90023-7.