Suppr超能文献

浅表性胃窦炎的分级:细胞计数法与基于摄影法的比较

Grading of superficial antral gastritis: comparison of cell-counting and photographic-based methods.

作者信息

Collins J S, Watt P C, Hamilton P W, Sloan J M, Love A H

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Queen's University of Belfast, N. Ireland, U.K.

出版信息

J Pathol. 1991 Mar;163(3):251-6. doi: 10.1002/path.1711630311.

Abstract

A cell-counting technique and a photographic-based scoring system for assessing inflammatory cell infiltration were compared for agreement in 275 endoscopic gastric antral biopsies from 55 dyspeptic patients. Each biopsy was independently scored 0-5 for polymorphs and mononuclear cells using both methods, and a mean score was derived for each patient. There was a highly significant correlation between the mean patient scores obtained using each method (P less than 0.001). Agreement statistics showed that the mean score difference (cell-counting minus photographic score) was negative for polymorphonuclear and mononuclear cells, indicating that the photographic method yielded higher mean patient scores. Scatterplots of difference versus mean by the two methods showed that only 3.6 per cent of scores fell outside +/- 2 SD of the mean difference. The use of standard photomicrographs to grade superficial antral gastritis therefore provides accurate results, comparable to those obtained by cell counting, yet is a faster and much cheaper technique.

摘要

在来自55名消化不良患者的275份内镜胃窦活检样本中,对一种用于评估炎性细胞浸润的细胞计数技术和一种基于照片的评分系统进行了一致性比较。使用这两种方法对每份活检样本中的多形核细胞和单核细胞分别独立评分0至5分,并得出每位患者的平均评分。两种方法得出的患者平均评分之间存在高度显著的相关性(P<0.001)。一致性统计显示,多形核细胞和单核细胞的平均评分差异(细胞计数评分减去照片评分)为负,表明照片法得出的患者平均评分更高。两种方法的差异与平均值的散点图显示,只有3.6%的评分落在平均差异的±2个标准差之外。因此,使用标准显微照片对浅表性胃窦炎进行分级可提供准确的结果,与细胞计数法相当,但却是一种更快且成本低得多的技术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验