Suppr超能文献

“支持性”住房研究:对模式描述与衡量方法的全面综述

Studies of "supported" and "supportive" housing: a comprehensive review of model descriptions and measurement.

作者信息

Tabol Charity, Drebing Charles, Rosenheck Robert

机构信息

Mental Illness, Research and Education Clinical Center, Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital, 200 Springs Road, Bedford, MA 01730, USA.

出版信息

Eval Program Plann. 2010 Nov;33(4):446-56. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2009.12.002. Epub 2009 Dec 11.

Abstract

Supported housing is a service model that couples provision of independent housing with provision of community-based supports for individuals with psychiatric disabilities at risk of homelessness. Despite its promise as an alternative to traditional sequential residential rehabilitation programs, supported housing has not been evaluated to an extent that supports firm conclusions concerning the efficacy of specific program elements. We conducted a comprehensive review of the literature on supported housing and similarly labeled programs, to determine the degree of clarity in the supported housing model and the degree of fidelity to that model within the empirical literature, and to determine whether lack of clarity or fidelity are barriers to widespread, systematic program implementation and evaluation. We encountered a number of limitations in the literature, including conflicting use of program labels, inconsistent definitions of supported housing and its elements, and use of inadequate measurement indices in assessing adherence to program elements. Our findings suggest that greater model clarity, better specification of model elements, and greater standardization in measurement of program dimensions would aid in supported housing program implementation and evaluation. We present a number of recommendations for the field and suggestions for future research.

摘要

支持性住房是一种服务模式,它将为有精神疾病残疾且面临无家可归风险的个人提供独立住房与基于社区的支持相结合。尽管作为传统顺序式住宅康复项目的替代方案,支持性住房具有潜力,但尚未得到充分评估,无法就特定项目要素的有效性得出确凿结论。我们对有关支持性住房及类似标签项目的文献进行了全面综述,以确定支持性住房模式的清晰程度、实证文献中对该模式的遵循程度,并确定缺乏清晰度或遵循度是否是广泛、系统的项目实施和评估的障碍。我们在文献中遇到了一些局限性,包括项目标签的使用冲突、支持性住房及其要素的定义不一致,以及在评估对项目要素的遵循情况时使用的测量指标不充分。我们的研究结果表明,提高模式清晰度、更好地明确模式要素以及在项目维度测量方面实现更大程度的标准化,将有助于支持性住房项目的实施和评估。我们为该领域提出了一些建议以及对未来研究的建议。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验