Kalafat John, Illback Robert J, Sanders Daniel
Rutgers Graduate School of Applied and Professional Psychology, 152 Frelinghuysen Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854-8085, USA.
Eval Program Plann. 2007 May;30(2):136-48. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2007.01.004. Epub 2007 Jan 26.
There is increasing recognition of the need for evaluations that identify program processes or mediators and assess degree of program implementation rather than focusing solely on outcome evaluation. This paper describes the application of complementary qualitative and quantitative evaluation procedures to assess the degree of implementation of multi-component family support programs for improving educational outcomes for at risk youth, and to assess the relationship between program implementation and outcomes. The qualitative evaluation involved prolonged engagement to identify common program domains or mediators. Using a method called Innovation Configuration Analysis, levels of implementation of program domains were explicated as well as an overall Implementation Fidelity Index. Strong positive relationships were found between overall program implementation and program-level outcomes achieved by student participants.
人们越来越认识到,需要进行评估以确定项目流程或调节因素,并评估项目实施程度,而不是仅仅专注于结果评估。本文描述了应用互补的定性和定量评估程序,以评估多成分家庭支持项目的实施程度,该项目旨在改善高危青少年的教育成果,并评估项目实施与成果之间的关系。定性评估涉及长期参与,以确定常见的项目领域或调节因素。使用一种称为创新配置分析的方法,阐述了项目领域的实施水平以及总体实施保真度指数。研究发现,项目总体实施与学生参与者取得的项目层面成果之间存在强烈的正相关关系。