Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 619 19th Street South, Birmingham, AL 35249, USA.
Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Jun;55(6):527-537.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.12.020. Epub 2010 Apr 14.
Previous studies suggest improved patient outcomes for providers who perform high volumes of complex medical procedures. Out-of-hospital tracheal intubation is a difficult procedure. We seek to determine the association between rescuer procedural experience and patient survival after out-of-hospital tracheal intubation.
We analyzed probabilistically linked Pennsylvania statewide emergency medicine services, hospital discharge, and death data of patients receiving out-of-hospital tracheal intubation. We defined tracheal intubation experience as cumulative tracheal intubation during 2000 to 2005; low=1 to 10 tracheal intubations, medium=11 to 25 tracheal intubations, high=26 to 50 tracheal intubations, and very high=greater than 50 tracheal intubations. We identified survival on hospital discharge of patients intubated during 2003 to 2005. Using generalized estimating equations, we evaluated the association between patient survival and out-of-hospital rescuer cumulative tracheal intubation experience, adjusted for clinical covariates.
During 2003 to 2005, 4,846 rescuers performed tracheal intubation. These individuals performed tracheal intubation on 33,117 patients during 2003 to 2005 and 62,586 patients during 2000 to 2005. Among 21,753 cardiac arrests, adjusted odds of survival was higher for patients intubated by rescuers with very high tracheal intubation experience; adjusted odds ratio (OR) versus low tracheal intubation experience: very high 1.48 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15 to 1.89), high 1.13 (95% CI 0.98 to 1.31), and medium 1.02 (95% CI 0.91 to 1.15). Among 8,162 medical nonarrests, adjusted odds of survival were higher for patients intubated by rescuers with high and very high tracheal intubation experience; adjusted OR versus low tracheal intubation experience: very high 1.55 (95% CI 1.08 to 2.22), high 1.29 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.59), and medium 1.16 (95% CI 0.97 to 1.38). Among 3,202 trauma nonarrests, survival was not associated with rescuer tracheal intubation experience; adjusted OR versus low tracheal intubation experience: very high 1.84 (95% CI 0.89 to 3.81), high 1.25 (95% CI 0.85 to 1.85), and medium 0.92 (95% CI 0.67 to 1.26).
Rescuer procedural experience is associated with improved patient survival after out-of-hospital tracheal intubation of cardiac arrest and medical nonarrest patients. Rescuer procedural experience is not associated with patient survival after out-of-hospital tracheal intubation of trauma nonarrest patients.
先前的研究表明,对于进行大量复杂医疗程序的提供者,患者的预后得到了改善。院外气管插管是一项困难的操作。我们旨在确定急救人员操作经验与院外气管插管患者生存之间的关联。
我们分析了宾夕法尼亚州全州范围内的急救医疗服务、医院出院和死亡数据的概率链接,以及接受院外气管插管的患者的数据。我们将气管插管经验定义为 2000 年至 2005 年期间的累计气管插管次数;低=1 至 10 次气管插管,中=11 至 25 次气管插管,高=26 至 50 次气管插管,非常高=大于 50 次气管插管。我们确定了在 2003 年至 2005 年期间进行插管的患者的出院时生存情况。使用广义估计方程,我们调整了临床协变量后,评估了患者生存与院外急救人员累计气管插管经验之间的关联。
在 2003 年至 2005 年期间,有 4846 名救援人员进行了气管插管。这些人员在 2003 年至 2005 年期间对 33117 名患者进行了气管插管,在 2000 年至 2005 年期间对 62586 名患者进行了气管插管。在 21753 例心脏骤停中,具有非常高气管插管经验的救援人员进行插管的患者的生存调整后优势比更高;与低气管插管经验相比的调整后优势比(OR):非常高 1.48(95%置信区间[CI] 1.15 至 1.89),高 1.13(95%CI 0.98 至 1.31),中 1.02(95%CI 0.91 至 1.15)。在 8162 例非心脏骤停的医疗病例中,具有高和非常高气管插管经验的救援人员进行插管的患者的生存调整后优势比更高;与低气管插管经验相比的调整后优势比:非常高 1.55(95%CI 1.08 至 2.22),高 1.29(95%CI 1.04 至 1.59),中 1.16(95%CI 0.97 至 1.38)。在 3202 例非创伤性非心脏骤停病例中,生存与救援人员气管插管经验无关;与低气管插管经验相比的调整后优势比:非常高 1.84(95%CI 0.89 至 3.81),高 1.25(95%CI 0.85 至 1.85),中 0.92(95%CI 0.67 至 1.26)。
急救人员的操作经验与院外气管插管的心脏骤停和非心脏骤停患者的生存改善有关。急救人员的操作经验与院外气管插管的创伤性非心脏骤停患者的生存无关。