Suppr超能文献

纠正瓣叶脱垂可扩大适合保留瓣膜主动脉根部替换术的患者范围。

Correction of leaflet prolapse extends the spectrum of patients suitable for valve-sparing aortic root replacement.

机构信息

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010 Jun;37(6):1311-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.12.031.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Preservation of the native aortic valve in patients requiring aortic root replacement avoids the need for lifelong anticoagulation and potentially offers greater durability than a bio-prosthetic valve. Such techniques have generally been applied to patients with early grades of aortic regurgitation (AR) and less severe aortic root dilatation where leaflets have been minimally stretched. We reviewed our experience with these techniques and in particular the durability of the addition of leaflet prolapse correction in patients with more advanced aortic root pathology compared to those with non-prolapsing leaflets.

METHODS

A total of 61 patients with tri-leaflet valves underwent valve-sparing aortic root replacement, of which 42 (69%) had leaflet prolapse correction. There were 48 (79%) males and mean age was 61 + or - 13 years. The majority of patients had either severe AR secondary to aortic root dilatation or aortic root aneurysms. Grade 3+ or 4+ AR was present in 47 (77%) patients. The re-implantation technique was performed in 53 (87%) patients and the remodelling in eight (13%) patients. Concomitant cardiac procedures were performed in 29 (48%) patients including aortic arch reconstruction in 15 (25%).

RESULTS

There were three (4.9%) in-hospital and one late death. Mean follow-up was 28 + or - 26 months and was 98% complete. Five patients developed grade 3 or 4 AR, of whom three required aortic valve replacement (AVR), which was performed uneventfully. Five-year survival was 95 + or - 2.8%. Freedom from AR was 88 + or - 5.3% and freedom from AVR was 93 + or - 4.1% at 5 years. Patients who had correction of leaflet prolapse experienced equivalent freedom from significant AR to those who did not require it.

CONCLUSION

Patients with large aortic root aneurysms and advanced AR often have stretched leaflets that will prolapse and lead to early failure if only root geometry is corrected. With the addition of leaflet prolapse correction, we have shown equivalent durability to those without stretched leaflets. This has allowed valve preservation in a sizable subgroup who would otherwise have received prosthetic valves. Greater patient numbers and longer follow-up are needed to fully validate this approach.

摘要

目的

在需要主动脉根部置换的患者中保留原生主动脉瓣可避免终身抗凝的需要,并提供比生物假体瓣膜更高的耐久性。这些技术通常应用于主动脉瓣反流(AR)早期分级和主动脉根部扩张较轻的患者,其中瓣叶仅轻微拉伸。我们回顾了这些技术的经验,特别是在更严重的主动脉根部病变患者中,与瓣叶无脱垂患者相比,瓣叶脱垂矫正的附加耐久性。

方法

共有 61 例三叶瓣患者接受了保留瓣叶的主动脉根部置换术,其中 42 例(69%)进行了瓣叶脱垂矫正。48 例(79%)为男性,平均年龄为 61±13 岁。大多数患者均有因主动脉根部扩张或主动脉根部动脉瘤导致的严重 AR。47 例(77%)患者存在 3+或 4+AR。53 例(87%)患者行再植入技术,8 例(13%)患者行重塑术。29 例(48%)患者同时行心脏手术,其中 15 例(25%)行主动脉弓重建。

结果

3 例(4.9%)院内死亡,1 例晚期死亡。平均随访时间为 28±26 个月,随访率为 98%。5 例患者发生 3 级或 4 级 AR,其中 3 例需要主动脉瓣置换(AVR),均顺利进行。5 年生存率为 95%±2.8%。AR 无复发率为 88%±5.3%,AVR 无复发率为 93%±4.1%,5 年时。需要矫正瓣叶脱垂的患者与不需要矫正的患者具有同等的无明显 AR 自由。

结论

主动脉根部大动脉瘤和严重 AR 的患者,瓣叶往往会拉伸,如果仅纠正根部几何形状,瓣叶会脱垂并导致早期失败。通过附加瓣叶脱垂矫正,我们已经证明与无拉伸瓣叶的耐久性相当。这使得在很大一部分可能需要接受人工瓣膜的患者中保留了瓣膜。需要更多的患者数量和更长的随访时间来充分验证这种方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验