Department of Psychology, General and Experimental Psychology/Neuro-cognitive Psychology, Ludwig Maximilian University, Leopoldstr. 13, D-80802 Munich, Germany.
Neuropsychologia. 2010 May;48(6):1616-27. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.01.029. Epub 2010 Feb 6.
Recent research revealed that patients with spatial hemineglect show deficits in the judgment of the subjective vertical and horizontal. Systematic deviations in the subjective axes have been demonstrated in the visual and tactile modality, indicating a supramodal spatial orientation deficit. Further, the magnitude of the bias was shown to be modulated by head- and body-position. The present study investigated the effect of passive lateral head inclination on the subjective visual and tactile vertical and horizontal in neglect patients, control patients with left- or right-sided brain damage without neglect and healthy controls. Subjects performed visual- and tactile-spatial judgments of axis orientations in an upright head orientation and with lateral head inclination 25 degrees in clockwise (CW) or counterclockwise (CCW) direction. Neglect patients displayed a marked variability as well as a systematic tilt in their spatial judgments. In line with a multisensory spatial orientation deficit their subjective vertical and horizontal was tilted CCW in the visual and in the tactile modality, while such a tilt was not evident in any other subject group. Furthermore, lateral head inclination had a differential effect in neglect patients, but not in control subjects. Neglect patients' judgments were modulated in the direction of the head tilt ('A-effect'). That is, a CCW inclination further increased the CCW spatial bias whereas a CW inclination decreased the spatial bias and thus led to approximately normal performance. The increased A-effect might be caused by a pathologically strong attraction of the subjective vertical by an idiotropic vector relying on the actual head orientation, as a consequence of impaired processing of gravitational information in neglect patients.
最近的研究表明,空间忽视患者在主观垂直和水平的判断上存在缺陷。在视觉和触觉模态中已经证明了主观轴的系统偏差,表明存在超模态的空间定向缺陷。此外,偏差的幅度被证明受到头部和身体位置的调节。本研究调查了被动横向头部倾斜对忽视患者、左或右脑损伤但无忽视的对照组患者以及健康对照组患者的主观视觉和触觉垂直和水平的影响。在直立头部姿势和以顺时针(CW)或逆时针(CCW)方向倾斜 25 度的情况下,受试者进行了轴方向的视觉和触觉空间判断。忽视患者的空间判断表现出明显的可变性和系统性倾斜。与多感官空间定向缺陷一致,他们的主观垂直和水平在视觉和触觉模态中向 CCW 倾斜,而在任何其他受试者组中都没有明显的倾斜。此外,横向头部倾斜对忽视患者有不同的影响,但对对照组患者没有影响。忽视患者的判断受到头部倾斜的调节(“A 效应”)。也就是说,CCW 倾斜进一步增加了 CCW 空间偏差,而 CW 倾斜则减小了空间偏差,从而导致了大致正常的表现。增加的 A 效应可能是由于忽视患者对重力信息处理受损,导致依赖于实际头部方向的自身取向向量对主观垂直的病理性强烈吸引所致。