Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
Am J Sports Med. 2010 Apr;38(4):733-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546509351558. Epub 2010 Feb 5.
Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction techniques have afforded baseball players up to a reported 90% return to prior or higher level of play. A subpopulation exists with less impressive clinical outcomes potentially related to the presence of a concomitant flexor-pronator mass injury.
HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE: Combined flexor-pronator and ulnar collateral ligament injuries occur in older players, and results in this group are inferior to those reported for isolated ulnar collateral ligament reconstructions.
Case Series; Level of evidence, 4.
All baseball players who had ulnar collateral ligament reconstructions by 1 surgeon over a 6-year period were identified, and the authors studied those treated for a combined flexor-pronator and ulnar collateral ligament injury. The ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction was accomplished using the docking technique, and the flexor-pronator injury was treated with debridement if tendinotic or reattachment if torn. A 2-sample t test was conducted to evaluate the likelihood of developing the combined flexor-pronator/ulnar collateral ligament compared with ulnar collateral ligament injury based on age, while a Pearson chi(2) test was used to evaluate the likelihood of a patient being > or =30 years of age in the combined flexor-pronator/ulnar collateral ligament versus ulnar collateral ligament groups. Outcome was assessed using a modified Conway classification.
A total of 187 male baseball players between 14 and 42 years of age (mean, 20.7 years) had an ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction by 1 surgeon. Eight (4%) of 187 baseball players were treated for the combined flexor-pronator/ulnar collateral ligament injury. There was a statistically significant difference in age between the ulnar collateral ligament group (20.1 years) and the flexor-pronator/ulnar collateral ligament group (33.4 years) (P < .001). Age > or =30 years was a statistically significant age limit to predict the presence of a combined flexor-pronator/ulnar collateral ligament injury (88%) compared with an isolated ulnar collateral ligament injury (1%) (P < .001). Outcomes were 1 excellent (12.5%), 2 fair (25%), and 5 poor (62.5%). Conclusion Combined fflexor-pronator and ulnar collateral ligament injuries in baseball players may portend a worse prognosis, with a 12.5% return to prior level of play. Older age (> or =30 years) is a risk factor in the development of this combined injury. When combined flexor-pronator/ulnar collateral ligament injury is suspected preoperatively, patients should be counseled on expected outcomes appropriately.
尺侧副韧带重建技术使棒球运动员的恢复率高达 90%,可恢复到受伤前或更高的运动水平。但有一部分患者的临床效果并不理想,这可能与同时存在屈肌-旋前肌损伤有关。
假设/目的:老年棒球运动员中同时存在屈肌-旋前肌和尺侧副韧带损伤,其结果不如单独的尺侧副韧带重建报告的结果好。
病例系列;证据等级,4 级。
作者确定了一位外科医生在 6 年内进行尺侧副韧带重建的所有棒球运动员,并对同时接受屈肌-旋前肌和尺侧副韧带损伤治疗的患者进行了研究。尺侧副韧带重建采用对接技术,对于肌腱病患者采用清创术,对于撕裂患者采用再附着术。采用两样本 t 检验评估基于年龄发生合并屈肌-旋前肌/尺侧副韧带损伤与尺侧副韧带损伤的可能性,采用 Pearson χ²检验评估合并屈肌-旋前肌/尺侧副韧带损伤与尺侧副韧带损伤患者中年龄>30 岁的可能性。采用改良康威分类法评估预后。
1 位外科医生共对 187 名 14~42 岁(平均 20.7 岁)的男性棒球运动员进行了尺侧副韧带重建。8 名(4%)棒球运动员同时接受了屈肌-旋前肌/尺侧副韧带损伤的治疗。尺侧副韧带组(20.1 岁)和屈肌-旋前肌/尺侧副韧带组(33.4 岁)的年龄存在显著差异(P<.001)。年龄>30 岁是预测同时发生屈肌-旋前肌/尺侧副韧带损伤(88%)与单纯尺侧副韧带损伤(1%)的显著年龄界限(P<.001)。结果为 1 优(12.5%)、2 良(25%)和 5 差(62.5%)。结论:棒球运动员同时发生屈肌-旋前肌和尺侧副韧带损伤可能预示预后较差,恢复到受伤前运动水平的比例为 12.5%。年龄>30 岁(≥30 岁)是发生这种合并损伤的危险因素。术前怀疑同时发生屈肌-旋前肌/尺侧副韧带损伤时,应适当告知患者预期结果。