俄勒冈州的配给计划公平吗？ - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

Is the Oregon rationing plan fair?

作者信息

Daniels N

机构信息

Department of Philosophy, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155.

出版信息

JAMA. 1991 May 1;265(17):2232-5.

PMID:2013956

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

Is the Oregon rationing plan fair?俄勒冈州的配给计划公平吗？

JAMA. 1991 May 1;265(17):2232-5.

Justice, politics and community: expanding access and rationing health services in Oregon.正义、政治与社区：俄勒冈州扩大医疗服务可及性与实施医疗资源配给

Law Med Health Care. 1992 Spring-Summer;20(1-2):67-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1992.tb01174.x.

Ethics and priority setting in Oregon.俄勒冈州的伦理与优先事项设定

Health Aff (Millwood). 1991 Summer;10(2):78-87. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.10.2.78.

The Oregon Plan: an ethical solution to the health care crisis?《俄勒冈计划》：医疗保健危机的道德解决方案？

J Health Hosp Law. 1993 May;26(5):133-42, 160.

Should basic care get priority? Doubts about rationing the Oregon way.基本医疗应该优先保障吗？对俄勒冈州医疗资源分配方式的质疑。

Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1991 Sep;1(3):187-206. doi: 10.1353/ken.0.0173.

Justice and the moral acceptability of rationing medical care: the Oregon experiment.医疗资源分配的公正性与道德可接受性：俄勒冈州的实验。

J Med Philos. 1992 Feb;17(1):97-117. doi: 10.1093/jmp/17.1.97.

The Oregon Medicaid program: is it just?俄勒冈医疗补助计划：它公平吗？

Health Matrix Clevel. 1991 Summer;1(2):175-99; discussion 201-4.

Oregon's experiment.俄勒冈州的实验。

Health Care Anal. 1993 Jun;1(1):15-32. doi: 10.1007/BF02196966.

Is rationing ever ethically justifiable?资源配给在伦理上是否有正当理由？

Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc. 2002 Summer;65(3):18-9.

Just caring: Oregon, health care rationing, and informed democratic deliberation.仅仅是关怀：俄勒冈州、医疗保健配给与知情的民主审议。

J Med Philos. 1994 Aug;19(4):367-88. doi: 10.1093/jmp/19.4.367.

引用本文的文献

Exploring Democratic Deliberation in Public Health: Bridging Division and Enhancing Community Engagement.探索公共卫生领域的民主审议：弥合分歧并加强社区参与。

Am J Public Health. 2025 Apr;115(4):500-505. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2024.307998.

Containing U.S. health care costs: What bullet to bite?控制美国医疗保健成本：该咬哪颗子弹？

Health Care Financ Rev. 1992 Mar;1991(Suppl):1-12.

The ethics and reality of rationing in medicine.医学资源分配的伦理与现实

Chest. 2011 Dec;140(6):1625-1632. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-0622.

The role of ethics committees and ethics consultation in allocation decisions: a 4-stage process.伦理委员会和伦理咨询在分配决策中的作用：四阶段过程。

Med Care. 2010 Sep;48(9):821-6. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181e577fb.

J Gen Intern Med. 1997 Nov;12(11):686-97. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.07142.x.

Medical necessity and defined coverage benefits in the Oregon Health Plan.俄勒冈健康计划中的医疗必要性和规定的承保福利。

Am J Public Health. 1997 Jun;87(6):1053-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.6.1053.

Oregon's health care rationing plan. Committee on Bioethical Issues of the Medical Society of the State of New York.俄勒冈州的医疗保健配给计划。纽约州医学协会生物伦理问题委员会。

J Gen Intern Med. 1996 Feb;11(2):104-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02599586.

Quality of life assessments and levels of decision making: differentiating objectives.

Qual Life Res. 1993 Aug;2(4):297-303. doi: 10.1007/BF00434801.

Methods for assessing relative importance in preference based outcome measures.基于偏好的结局指标中评估相对重要性的方法。

Qual Life Res. 1993 Dec;2(6):467-75. doi: 10.1007/BF00422221.

On sale: future health care. The paradox of discounting.特价销售：未来医疗保健。贴现的悖论。

West J Med. 1992 May;156(5):550-3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验