Lee T H, Juarez G, Cook E F, Weisberg M C, Rouan G W, Brand D A, Goldman L
Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115.
N Engl J Med. 1991 May 2;324(18):1239-46. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199105023241803.
Although previous investigations have suggested that 24 hours is required to exclude acute myocardial infarction in patients who are admitted to a coronary care unit for the evaluation of acute chest pain, we hypothesized that a 12-hour period might be adequate for patients with a low probability of infarction at the time of admission.
Using a Bayesian model, we developed a strategy to identify candidates for a shorter period of observation from an analysis of a derivation set of 976 patients with acute chest pain who were admitted to three teaching and four community hospitals. In the derivation set, patients whose clinical characteristics in the emergency room predicted a low (less than or equal to 7 percent) probability of myocardial infarction had only a 0.4 percent risk of infarction if they had neither abnormal levels of cardiac enzymes nor recurrent ischemic pain during the first 12 hours of hospitalization. In an independent testing set of 2684 patients from the seven hospitals, 957 admitted patients (36 percent) were classified as candidates for this 12-hour period of observation according to a previously published multivariate algorithm. Few of these patients were actually transferred from a monitored setting at 12 hours.
Of the 771 candidates for a 12-hour period of observation who did not have enzyme abnormalities or recurrent pain during the first 12 hours, 4 (0.5 percent) were subsequently found to have acute myocardial infarction, and only 3 (0.4 percent) died after primary cardiac arrests, all of which occurred three to five days after admission. Rates of other major cardiovascular complications were low in the patients who might have been transferred from the coronary care unit after 12 hours with this strategy. In patients with a higher initial risk of infarction, the standard strategy of 24-hour observation identified all but 11 of 739 acute myocardial infarctions (1 percent).
Emergency room clinical data can be used to identify a large subgroup of patients for whom a 12-hour period of observation is normally sufficient to exclude acute myocardial infarction. Patient-specific evaluation and treatment can then proceed without the restrictions imposed by "rule-out" protocols for myocardial infarction.
尽管先前的研究表明,对于因急性胸痛入院至冠心病监护病房接受评估的患者,需要24小时才能排除急性心肌梗死,但我们推测,对于入院时梗死可能性较低的患者,12小时可能就足够了。
我们使用贝叶斯模型,通过对976例因急性胸痛入住三家教学医院和四家社区医院的患者的推导集进行分析,制定了一种策略,以识别观察期较短的患者。在推导集中,那些在急诊室的临床特征预测心肌梗死可能性较低(小于或等于7%)的患者,如果在住院的前12小时内心脏酶水平无异常且无复发性缺血性疼痛,那么他们发生梗死的风险仅为0.4%。在来自这七家医院的2684例患者的独立测试集中,根据先前发表的多变量算法,957例入院患者(36%)被归类为适合进行12小时观察期的患者。实际上,这些患者中很少有人在12小时时从监测环境中转出。
在771例适合12小时观察期且在最初12小时内无酶异常或复发性疼痛的患者中,4例(0.5%)随后被发现患有急性心肌梗死,只有3例(0.4%)在原发性心脏骤停后死亡,所有这些死亡均发生在入院后三至五天。采用该策略,在12小时后可能从冠心病监护病房转出的患者中,其他主要心血管并发症的发生率较低。在梗死初始风险较高的患者中,24小时观察的标准策略识别出了739例急性心肌梗死中的728例(99%)。
急诊室临床数据可用于识别一大组患者,对他们而言,12小时的观察期通常足以排除急性心肌梗死。然后可以进行针对患者的评估和治疗,而不受心肌梗死“排除”方案的限制。