• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ART 修复体在恒牙列的十年存活率。

Ten-year survival of ART restorations in permanent posterior teeth.

机构信息

University Basic Health Care Centre (UBAS), Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Clin Oral Investig. 2011 Apr;15(2):265-71. doi: 10.1007/s00784-009-0378-x. Epub 2010 Feb 6.

DOI:10.1007/s00784-009-0378-x
PMID:20140470
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3055991/
Abstract

This study evaluated the 10-year clinical performance of high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement placed in posterior permanent teeth by means of the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) approach. One operator placed 167 single- and 107 multiple-surface restorations in 43 high-risk caries pregnant women (mean decayed teeth = 9.8 ± 5.5). Examinations were performed at 1-, 2-, and 10-year intervals according to ART criteria. In the last evaluation, the US Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria were also used. After 10 years, 129 restorations (47.1%) were evaluated and achieved a cumulative survival rate of 49.0% (SE 7.2%). The 10-year survival of single- and multiple-surface ART restorations assessed using the ART criteria were 65.2% (SE 7.3%) and 30.6% (SE 9.9%), respectively. This difference was significant (jackknife SE of difference; p < 0.05). Using the USPHS criteria, the 10-year survival of single- and multiple-surface ART restorations were 86.5% and 57.6%, respectively. The primary causes of failure were total loss (9.3%) and marginal defects (5.4%). The survival rates observed, especially for the single-surface restorations, confirm the potential of the ART approach for restoring and saving posterior permanent teeth.

摘要

本研究通过微创修复治疗(ART)的方法评估了高粘度玻璃离子水门汀在后牙永久修复中的 10 年临床性能。一名操作者为 43 名高龋风险孕妇(平均患牙数=9.8±5.5)进行了 167 个单表面和 107 个多表面修复体的治疗。根据 ART 标准,在 1 年、2 年和 10 年的间隔进行检查。在最后一次评估中,还使用了美国公共卫生服务(USPHS)标准。10 年后,对 129 个修复体(47.1%)进行了评估,累积存活率为 49.0%(SE 7.2%)。根据 ART 标准评估的单表面和多表面 ART 修复体的 10 年存活率分别为 65.2%(SE 7.3%)和 30.6%(SE 9.9%),差异有统计学意义(差异的折刀 SE,p<0.05)。根据 USPHS 标准,单表面和多表面 ART 修复体的 10 年存活率分别为 86.5%和 57.6%。失败的主要原因是全部丧失(9.3%)和边缘缺陷(5.4%)。观察到的存活率,尤其是单表面修复体的存活率,证实了 ART 方法在后牙永久修复中的潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/32a9/3055991/99b1c62db342/784_2009_378_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/32a9/3055991/81693b667365/784_2009_378_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/32a9/3055991/96153209ecae/784_2009_378_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/32a9/3055991/99b1c62db342/784_2009_378_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/32a9/3055991/81693b667365/784_2009_378_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/32a9/3055991/96153209ecae/784_2009_378_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/32a9/3055991/99b1c62db342/784_2009_378_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Ten-year survival of ART restorations in permanent posterior teeth.ART 修复体在恒牙列的十年存活率。
Clin Oral Investig. 2011 Apr;15(2):265-71. doi: 10.1007/s00784-009-0378-x. Epub 2010 Feb 6.
2
Effectiveness of ART and traditional amalgam approach in restoring single-surface cavities in posterior teeth of permanent dentitions in school children after 6.3 years.6.3年后抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)与传统汞合金修复法对学龄儿童恒牙后牙单面龋洞的修复效果。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2007 Jun;35(3):207-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2006.00322.x.
3
Comparison of ART and conventional techniques on clinical performance of glass-ionomer cement restorations in load bearing areas of permanent and primary dentitions: A systematic review.ART 和常规技术在恒牙和乳牙承重区玻璃离子水门汀修复体临床性能比较的系统评价。
J Dent. 2018 Nov;78:1-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.07.008. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
4
Randomized Controlled Trial of Class II ART High-viscosity Glass-ionomer Cement and Conventional Resin-composite restorations in Permanent Dentition: Two-year Survival.随机对照临床试验 II 类 ART 高黏度玻璃离子水门汀和传统树脂复合材料修复体在恒牙列中的应用:两年生存率。
J Adhes Dent. 2020;22(6):555-565. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a45512.
5
Comparison between restorations in the permanent dentition produced by hand and rotary instrumentation--survival after 3 years.手工器械与旋转器械制作的恒牙修复体的比较——3年后的存留情况
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2003 Apr;31(2):122-8. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0528.2003.00027.x.
6
Survival of ART and amalgam restorations in permanent teeth of children after 6.3 years.6.3年后儿童恒牙中抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)修复体和汞合金修复体的存留情况
J Dent Res. 2006 Jul;85(7):622-6. doi: 10.1177/154405910608500708.
7
Randomized clinical trial of class II restoration in permanent teeth comparing ART with composite resin after 12 months.恒牙二类洞型修复的随机临床试验:比较 12 个月时 ART 与复合树脂的疗效。
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Sep;23(9):3623-3635. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2787-1. Epub 2019 Jan 6.
8
Effectiveness of glass-ionomer (ART) and amalgam restorations in the deciduous dentition: results after 3 years.玻璃离子体修复术(ART)与汞合金修复乳牙的疗效:3年后的结果
Caries Res. 2002 Nov-Dec;36(6):437-44. doi: 10.1159/000066531.
9
Survival percentages of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) restorations and sealants in posterior teeth: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.后牙非创伤性修复治疗(ART)修复体和窝沟封闭剂的存留率:一项更新的系统评价和Meta分析
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Nov;22(8):2703-2725. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2625-5. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
10
How effective is ART in the management of dental caries?抗龋修复治疗(ART)在龋齿管理中的效果如何?
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1999 Dec;27(6):423-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1999.tb02043.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Zirconia-reinforced glass ionomer restorations in molar incisor hypomineralization: a randomized controlled clinical trial.氧化锆增强玻璃离子修复体用于磨牙和前牙矿化不全:一项随机对照临床试验
Clin Oral Investig. 2025 May 8;29(6):290. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06352-y.
2
A Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Chemomechanical (Carie-Care™) Versus Conventional Caries Removal for Atraumatic Restorative Treatment.一项比较化学机械法(Carie-Care™)与传统龋洞去除法用于非创伤性修复治疗的随机对照试验。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2025 Jan 30;2025:6689053. doi: 10.1155/tswj/6689053. eCollection 2025.
3
Management of initial carious lesions of hypomineralized molars (MIH) with silver diamine fluoride or silver-modified atraumatic restorative treatment (SMART): 1-year results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Atraumatic restorative treatment versus amalgam restoration longevity: a systematic review.无创伤性修复治疗与银汞合金修复体的寿命:系统评价。
Clin Oral Investig. 2010 Jun;14(3):233-40. doi: 10.1007/s00784-009-0335-8. Epub 2009 Aug 18.
2
5-Year survival of ART restorations with and without cavity disinfection.有无窝洞消毒的ART修复体的5年生存率
J Dent. 2009 Jun;37(6):468-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.03.002. Epub 2009 Apr 1.
3
Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART): factors affecting success.非创伤性修复治疗(ART):影响成功的因素
用氟化银或银改良型无创伤性修复治疗(SMART)处理萌出不全低矿化磨牙的早期龋损(MIH)的管理:一项前瞻性、随机临床试验的 1 年结果。
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Feb;26(2):2197-2205. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04236-5. Epub 2021 Nov 6.
4
A prospective and randomized clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of ART restorations with high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement versus conventional restorations with resin composite in Class II cavities of permanent teeth: two-year follow-up.一项前瞻性、随机临床试验评估了高粘度玻璃离子水门汀 ART 修复体与传统树脂复合材料修复体在恒牙 II 类窝洞中的疗效:两年随访。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2021 Mar 1;29:e20200609. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2020-0609. eCollection 2021.
5
Randomized clinical trial of class II restoration in permanent teeth comparing ART with composite resin after 12 months.恒牙二类洞型修复的随机临床试验:比较 12 个月时 ART 与复合树脂的疗效。
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Sep;23(9):3623-3635. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2787-1. Epub 2019 Jan 6.
6
Survival percentages of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) restorations and sealants in posterior teeth: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.后牙非创伤性修复治疗(ART)修复体和窝沟封闭剂的存留率:一项更新的系统评价和Meta分析
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Nov;22(8):2703-2725. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2625-5. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
7
Novel Nanotechnology of TiO Improves Physical-Chemical and Biological Properties of Glass Ionomer Cement.新型二氧化钛纳米技术改善玻璃离子水门汀的物理化学和生物学性能。
Int J Biomater. 2017;2017:7123919. doi: 10.1155/2017/7123919. Epub 2017 May 22.
8
One-year follow-up of Atraumatic Restorative Treatment(ART) for dental caries in children undergoing oncohematological treatment: a pragmatic trial.对接受肿瘤血液学治疗的儿童龋齿进行非创伤性修复治疗(ART)的一年随访:一项实用性试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2015 Oct 16;15(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12903-015-0110-y.
9
Success rates of manual restorative treatment (MRT) with amalgam in permanent teeth in high caries-risk Filipino children.菲律宾高龋齿风险恒牙儿童使用汞合金进行手工修复治疗(MRT)的成功率
Clin Oral Investig. 2015 Jul;19(6):1493-500. doi: 10.1007/s00784-014-1374-3. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
10
Direct contra naïve-indirect comparison of clinical failure rates between high-viscosity GIC and conventional amalgam restorations: an empirical study.高粘度玻璃离子粘固剂与传统银汞合金修复体临床失败率的直接对 naive-间接比较:一项实证研究。 (注:原文中“contra naïve”表述有误,可能影响准确理解,推测可能是“contranative”之类的错误表述,但按要求仅照原文翻译)
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 28;8(10):e78397. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078397. eCollection 2013.
J Appl Oral Sci. 2006;14 Suppl:34-6. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572006000700008.
4
Research proposal: evaluation of ART in adult patients.
J Appl Oral Sci. 2006;14 Suppl:25-9. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572006000700006.
5
Fracture resistance of Class II glass-ionomer cement restorations.
Am J Dent. 2008 Jun;21(3):163-7.
6
Six-year evaluation of the atraumatic restorative treatment approach in permanent-tooth Class III restorations.
J Adhes Dent. 2008 Jun;10(3):233-7.
7
Clinical evaluation of multiple-surface ART restorations: 12 month follow-up.多面玻璃离子黏固剂修复体的临床评估:12个月随访
J Dent Child (Chic). 2007 Sep-Dec;74(3):203-8.
8
Six-year follow up of atraumatic restorative treatment restorations placed in Chinese school children.对中国学龄儿童进行的非创伤性修复治疗修复体的六年随访。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2007 Oct;35(5):387-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2006.00342.x.
9
Influence of environmental calcium/phosphate and pH on glass ionomers.环境钙/磷及pH值对玻璃离子水门汀的影响。
Eur J Oral Sci. 2007 Jun;115(3):224-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2007.00443.x.
10
Effectiveness of ART and traditional amalgam approach in restoring single-surface cavities in posterior teeth of permanent dentitions in school children after 6.3 years.6.3年后抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)与传统汞合金修复法对学龄儿童恒牙后牙单面龋洞的修复效果。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2007 Jun;35(3):207-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2006.00322.x.