• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有无窝洞消毒的ART修复体的5年生存率

5-Year survival of ART restorations with and without cavity disinfection.

作者信息

Farag A, van der Sanden W J M, Abdelwahab H, Mulder J, Frencken J E

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry, Minia University, Minia City, Egypt.

出版信息

J Dent. 2009 Jun;37(6):468-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.03.002. Epub 2009 Apr 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.jdent.2009.03.002
PMID:19342148
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The null-hypothesis tested was that there is no difference between the survival of ART restorations with, and without, cavity disinfection among adolescents after 5 years.

METHODS

Eligible students were allocated to one of the treatment groups. One operator placed a total of 90 restorations, 45 each per treatment group, in ninety 14-15 year olds. Restorations were evaluated on replica models at baseline and after 1 and 5 years, by two calibrated and independent evaluators using the ART criteria. The independent variables were gender, mean DMFT score at baseline, cavity size (small/large), cavity type (single-/multiple surfaces) and disinfected cavity (yes/no). Statistical analyses were done using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test.

RESULTS

The cumulative survival percentage and standard error for the 61 ART restorations with and without disinfection at evaluation year 5 were 85% (S.E.=6.1%) and 80% (S.E.=7.1%), respectively: not significantly different (p=0.37) from each other. The cumulative survival percentage and standard error for all ART restorations was 97% (S.E.=2.0%) at evaluation year 1 and 82% (S.E.=4.7%) at year 5, and it was 85% (S.E.=5.4%) for single- and 77% (S.E.=9%) for multiple-surface ART restorations at year 5. The cumulative survival percentage of all ART restorations at evaluation year 5 was statistically significant higher for boys than for girls (p=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Disinfecting a cavity cleaned according to ART with a 2% chlorhexidine solution is unnecessary. It is useful to introduce the ART approach systematically into the healthcare system in Egypt.

摘要

目的

所检验的零假设是,青少年中经过窝洞消毒和未经过窝洞消毒的非创伤性修复治疗(ART)修复体在5年后的存留情况没有差异。

方法

符合条件的学生被分配到其中一个治疗组。一名操作人员在90名14 - 15岁青少年中总共放置了90个修复体,每个治疗组各45个。在基线以及1年和5年后,由两名经过校准且独立的评估人员使用ART标准在复制模型上对修复体进行评估。自变量包括性别、基线时的平均龋失补指数(DMFT)得分、窝洞大小(小/大)、窝洞类型(单面/多面)以及窝洞是否消毒(是/否)。使用Kaplan - Meier方法和对数秩检验进行统计分析。

结果

在评估的第5年,61个经过和未经过消毒的ART修复体的累积存留百分比及标准误分别为85%(标准误 = 6.1%)和80%(标准误 = 7.1%):二者之间无显著差异(p = 0.37)。所有ART修复体在评估第1年的累积存留百分比及标准误为97%(标准误 = 2.0%),在第5年为82%(标准误 = 4.7%),第5年时单面ART修复体的累积存留百分比为85%(标准误 = 5.4%),多面ART修复体为77%(标准误 = 9%)。在评估第5年,所有ART修复体的累积存留百分比在统计学上男孩显著高于女孩(p = 0.03)。

结论

用2%氯己定溶液对按ART方法清洁后的窝洞进行消毒没有必要。将ART方法系统引入埃及的医疗保健系统是有益的。

相似文献

1
5-Year survival of ART restorations with and without cavity disinfection.有无窝洞消毒的ART修复体的5年生存率
J Dent. 2009 Jun;37(6):468-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.03.002. Epub 2009 Apr 1.
2
The effect of a chlorhexidine containing cavity disinfectant on the clinical performance of high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement following ART: 24-month results.含氯己定的窝洞消毒剂对非创伤性修复治疗后高黏性玻璃离子水门汀临床性能的影响:24个月的结果
Am J Dent. 2008 Feb;21(1):39-43.
3
Effectiveness of ART and traditional amalgam approach in restoring single-surface cavities in posterior teeth of permanent dentitions in school children after 6.3 years.6.3年后抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)与传统汞合金修复法对学龄儿童恒牙后牙单面龋洞的修复效果。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2007 Jun;35(3):207-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2006.00322.x.
4
Comparison between restorations in the permanent dentition produced by hand and rotary instrumentation--survival after 3 years.手工器械与旋转器械制作的恒牙修复体的比较——3年后的存留情况
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2003 Apr;31(2):122-8. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0528.2003.00027.x.
5
Survival of self-etch adhesive Class II composite restorations using ART and conventional cavity preparations in primary molars.在乳牙中使用非创伤性修复治疗(ART)和传统窝洞预备的自酸蚀粘结Ⅱ类复合树脂修复体的存留情况。
Am J Dent. 2006 Dec;19(6):359-63.
6
Randomized clinical trial of adhesive restorations in primary molars. 18-month results.乳牙粘结修复的随机临床试验。18个月的结果。
Am J Dent. 2013 Dec;26(6):351-5.
7
A clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 17-year findings.后牙复合树脂修复体的临床评估:17年随访结果
J Dent. 2006 Aug;34(7):427-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2005.09.006. Epub 2005 Nov 28.
8
Comparison of two tooth-saving preparation techniques for one-surface cavities.单面洞两种保牙预备技术的比较
ASDC J Dent Child. 2002 Jan-Apr;69(1):16-26, 11.
9
Survival of ART and amalgam restorations in permanent teeth of children after 6.3 years.6.3年后儿童恒牙中抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)修复体和汞合金修复体的存留情况
J Dent Res. 2006 Jul;85(7):622-6. doi: 10.1177/154405910608500708.
10
Clinical comparison of bur- and laser-prepared minimally invasive occlusal resin composite restorations: two-year follow-up.微创牙合面树脂复合材料修复中车针和激光预备的临床比较:两年随访。
Oper Dent. 2010 Sep-Oct;35(5):500-7. doi: 10.2341/09-339-C.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison between visual clinical examination and the replica method for assessments of sealant retention over a 2-year period.在 2 年期间内,对窝沟封闭剂保留情况进行评估的视觉临床检查与复制方法的比较。
Int J Oral Sci. 2014 Jun;6(2):111-5. doi: 10.1038/ijos.2014.8. Epub 2014 Mar 14.
2
Dental caries in Arab League countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.阿拉伯国家的龋齿情况:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Dent J. 2014 Aug;64(4):173-80. doi: 10.1111/idj.12092. Epub 2014 Feb 8.
3
Minimal intervention dentistry for managing dental caries - a review: report of a FDI task group.
微创牙科治疗龋病管理——综述:国际牙科联盟工作组的报告。
Int Dent J. 2012 Oct;62(5):223-43. doi: 10.1111/idj.12007.
4
Twenty-five-year atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach: a comprehensive overview.25年非创伤性修复治疗(ART)方法:全面概述
Clin Oral Investig. 2012 Oct;16(5):1337-46. doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0783-4. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
5
Two decades of ART: improving on success through further research.二十年抗逆转录病毒疗法(ART):通过进一步研究提高成功率。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2009;17 Suppl(spe):122-33. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572009000700020.
6
The ART approach: clinical aspects reviewed.ART 方法:临床方面的回顾。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2009;17 Suppl(spe):89-98. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572009000700016.
7
Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations: a meta-analysis.ART 水门汀和修复体的保存率:一项荟萃分析。
Clin Oral Investig. 2012 Apr;16(2):429-41. doi: 10.1007/s00784-011-0513-3. Epub 2011 Jan 28.
8
Survival of ART restorations assessed using selected FDI and modified ART restoration criteria.采用选定的 FDI 和改良的 ART 修复标准评估 ART 修复体的存活率。
Clin Oral Investig. 2011 Jun;15(3):409-15. doi: 10.1007/s00784-010-0403-0. Epub 2010 Apr 7.
9
Ten-year survival of ART restorations in permanent posterior teeth.ART 修复体在恒牙列的十年存活率。
Clin Oral Investig. 2011 Apr;15(2):265-71. doi: 10.1007/s00784-009-0378-x. Epub 2010 Feb 6.