Suppr超能文献

危机干预小组警察转介至精神科急诊服务的患者特征。

Characteristics of patients referred to psychiatric emergency services by crisis intervention team police officers.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA.

出版信息

Community Ment Health J. 2010 Dec;46(6):579-84. doi: 10.1007/s10597-010-9295-3. Epub 2010 Feb 7.

Abstract

The Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) program trains police officers in crisis intervention skills and local psychiatric resources. Because the safety and appropriateness of any new intervention is a crucial consideration, it is necessary to ensure that CIT training does not result in excessive or inappropriate referrals to psychiatric emergency services (PES). Yet, aside from one prior report by Strauss et al. (2005) in Louisville, Kentucky, little is known about the comparability of patients referred to PES by CIT-trained officers in relation to other modes of referral. The research questions driving this retrospective chart review of patients referred to PES were: (1) What types of patients do CIT-trained officers refer to PES?, and (2) Do meaningful differences exist between patients referred by family members, non-CIT officers, and CIT-trained officers? Select sociodemographic and clinical variables were abstracted from the medical records of 300 patients during an eight-month period and compared by mode of referral. Differences across the three groups were found regarding: race, whether or not the patient was held on the locked observation unit, severe agitation, recent substance abuse, global functioning, and unkempt or bizarre appearance. However, there were virtually no differences between patients referred by CIT-trained and non-CIT officers. Thus, while there were some expected differences between patients referred by law enforcement and those referred by family members, CIT-trained officers appear to refer individuals appropriately to PES, as evidenced by such patients differing little from those referred by traditional, non-CIT police officers. Trained officers do not have a narrower view of people in need of emergency services (i.e., bringing in more severely ill individuals), and they do not have a broader view (i.e., bringing in those not in need of emergency services). Although CIT training does not appear to affect the type of individuals referred to PES, future research should examine the effect of CIT training on the frequency of referrals or proportion of subjects encountered that are referred, which may be expected to differ between CIT-trained and non-CIT officers.

摘要

危机干预小组 (CIT) 计划培训警察的危机干预技能和当地精神病学资源。由于任何新干预措施的安全性和适当性都是一个关键考虑因素,因此有必要确保 CIT 培训不会导致过多或不适当的精神病急诊服务 (PES) 转介。然而,除了肯塔基州路易斯维尔的 Strauss 等人(2005 年)之前的一份报告外,人们对 CIT 培训的警察转介到 PES 的患者与其他转介方式的可比性知之甚少。这项针对 PES 转介患者的回顾性图表审查的研究问题是:(1)CIT 培训的警察会将哪些类型的患者转介到 PES?(2)CIT 培训的警察与其他模式的转介之间是否存在有意义的差异?从 300 名患者的医疗记录中提取了一些社会人口统计学和临床变量,并按转介模式进行了比较。通过三种方式转介的患者之间存在差异:种族、患者是否被安置在锁定观察单元、严重激越、近期药物滥用、整体功能和不整洁或怪异的外表。然而,CIT 培训的警察与非 CIT 警察之间的患者几乎没有差异。因此,虽然执法人员转介的患者与家庭成员转介的患者之间存在一些预期差异,但 CIT 培训的警察似乎将个人适当地转介到 PES,因为他们的患者与非 CIT 警察转介的患者几乎没有区别。受过训练的警察对需要急诊服务的人(即转介更严重疾病的人)没有更狭隘的看法,也没有更广泛的看法(即转介那些不需要急诊服务的人)。虽然 CIT 培训似乎不会影响转介到 PES 的患者类型,但未来的研究应该检查 CIT 培训对转介频率或遇到的被转介者比例的影响,这可能在 CIT 培训的警察和非 CIT 警察之间有所不同。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验