Suppr超能文献

猕猴(恒河猴)和人类(智人)分类学习的阶段。

Stages of category learning in monkeys (Macaca mulatta) and humans (Homo sapiens).

作者信息

Smith J David, Chapman William P, Redford Joshua S

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14260, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2010 Jan;36(1):39-53. doi: 10.1037/a0016573.

Abstract

Smith and Minda (1998) and Blair and Homa (2001) studied the time course of category learning in humans. They distinguished an early, abstraction-based stage of category learning from a later stage that incorporated a capacity for categorizing exceptional category members. The present authors asked whether similar processing stages characterize the category learning of nonhuman primates. Humans (Homo sapiens) and monkeys (Macaca mulatta) participated in category-learning tasks that extended Blair and Homa's paradigm comparatively. Early in learning, both species improved on typical items more than on exception items, indicating an initial mastery of the categories' general structure. Later in learning, both species selectively improved their exception-item performance, indicating exception-item resolution or exemplar memorization. An initial stage of abstraction-based category learning may characterize categorization across a substantial range of the order Primates. This default strategy may have an adaptive resonance with the family resemblance organization of many natural-kind categories.

摘要

史密斯和明达(1998年)以及布莱尔和霍马(2001年)研究了人类类别学习的时间进程。他们区分了类别学习的早期基于抽象的阶段和后期阶段,后期阶段包含对异常类别成员进行分类的能力。本文作者探讨了类似的处理阶段是否也表征了非人类灵长类动物的类别学习。人类(智人)和猴子(猕猴)参与了类别学习任务,这些任务相对扩展了布莱尔和霍马的范式。在学习早期,两个物种在典型项目上的表现比在异常项目上的表现提升得更多,这表明它们初步掌握了类别的一般结构。在学习后期,两个物种都选择性地提高了它们在异常项目上的表现,这表明它们解决了异常项目或记住了范例。基于抽象的类别学习的初始阶段可能表征了灵长目动物广泛范围内的分类。这种默认策略可能与许多自然类别家族相似性组织具有适应性共鸣。

相似文献

1
Stages of category learning in monkeys (Macaca mulatta) and humans (Homo sapiens).
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2010 Jan;36(1):39-53. doi: 10.1037/a0016573.
3
Implicit and explicit category learning by macaques (Macaca mulatta) and humans (Homo sapiens).
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2010 Jan;36(1):54-65. doi: 10.1037/a0015892.
4
Stages of abstraction and exemplar memorization in pigeon category learning.
Psychol Sci. 2006 Dec;17(12):1059-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01833.x.
5
The learning of exclusive-or categories by monkeys (Macaca mulatta) and humans (Homo sapiens).
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2011 Jan;37(1):20-9. doi: 10.1037/a0019497.
6
The transfer of category knowledge by macaques (Macaca mulatta) and humans (Homo sapiens).
J Comp Psychol. 2018 Feb;132(1):58-74. doi: 10.1037/com0000095. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
7
Generalization of category knowledge and dimensional categorization in humans (Homo sapiens) and nonhuman primates (Macaca mulatta).
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2015 Oct;41(4):322-35. doi: 10.1037/xan0000071. Epub 2015 Jul 13.
8
Prototype abstraction by monkeys (Macaca mulatta).
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2008 May;137(2):390-401. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.137.2.390.
9
Prefrontal cortex activity during flexible categorization.
J Neurosci. 2010 Jun 23;30(25):8519-28. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4837-09.2010.
10
Category learning in rhesus monkeys: a study of the Shepard, Hovland, and Jenkins (1961) tasks.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004 Sep;133(3):398-414. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.133.3.398.

引用本文的文献

1
Jackdaws form categorical prototypes based on experience with category exemplars.
Brain Struct Funct. 2024 Apr;229(3):593-608. doi: 10.1007/s00429-023-02651-w. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
3
One-back reinforcement dissociates implicit-procedural and explicit-declarative category learning.
Mem Cognit. 2018 Feb;46(2):261-273. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0762-8.
4
Ecology, Fitness, Evolution: New Perspectives on Categorization.
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2016 Aug;25(4):266-274. doi: 10.1177/0963721416652393.
5
Categorization: The View from Animal Cognition.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2016 Jun 15;6(2):12. doi: 10.3390/bs6020012.
6
Mechanisms of object recognition: what we have learned from pigeons.
Front Neural Circuits. 2014 Oct 13;8:122. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2014.00122. eCollection 2014.
7
Cross-modal information integration in category learning.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2014 Jul;76(5):1473-84. doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0659-6.
8
Deferred feedback sharply dissociates implicit and explicit category learning.
Psychol Sci. 2014 Feb;25(2):447-57. doi: 10.1177/0956797613509112. Epub 2013 Dec 13.
9
Prototypes, exemplars, and the natural history of categorization.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Apr;21(2):312-31. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0506-0.
10
Posterror slowing predicts rule-based but not information-integration category learning.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Dec;20(6):1343-9. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0441-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Prototype identification and categorization of incomplete figures by pigeons.
Behav Processes. 1993 Dec;30(3):253-8. doi: 10.1016/0376-6357(93)90137-G.
2
Perceptual-cognitive universals as reflections of the world.
Psychon Bull Rev. 1994 Mar;1(1):2-28. doi: 10.3758/BF03200759.
3
The comparative psychology of same-different judgments by humans (Homo sapiens) and monkeys (Macaca mulatta).
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2008 Jul;34(3):361-74. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.34.3.361.
4
Prototype abstraction by monkeys (Macaca mulatta).
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2008 May;137(2):390-401. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.137.2.390.
5
Stages of abstraction and exemplar memorization in pigeon category learning.
Psychol Sci. 2006 Dec;17(12):1059-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01833.x.
6
Category discrimination by pigeons using five polymorphous features.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 Sep;54(2):69-84. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1990.54-69.
7
Human category learning.
Annu Rev Psychol. 2005;56:149-78. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070217.
8
Category learning in rhesus monkeys: a study of the Shepard, Hovland, and Jenkins (1961) tasks.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004 Sep;133(3):398-414. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.133.3.398.
9
Linear separability in superordinate natural language concepts.
Mem Cognit. 2004 Jan;32(1):83-95. doi: 10.3758/bf03195822.
10
SUSTAIN: a network model of category learning.
Psychol Rev. 2004 Apr;111(2):309-32. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.2.309.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验