Suppr超能文献

猕猴(恒河猴)和人类(智人)的内隐和外显类别学习。

Implicit and explicit category learning by macaques (Macaca mulatta) and humans (Homo sapiens).

作者信息

Smith J David, Beran Michael J, Crossley Matthew J, Boomer Joseph, Ashby F Gregory

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14260, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2010 Jan;36(1):54-65. doi: 10.1037/a0015892.

Abstract

An influential theoretical perspective differentiates in humans an explicit, rule-based system of category learning from an implicit system that slowly associates different regions of perceptual space with different response outputs. This perspective was extended for the 1st time to the category learning of nonhuman primates. Humans (Homo sapiens) and macaques (Macaca mulatta) learned categories composed of sine-wave gratings that varied across trials in bar width and bar orientation. The categories had either a single-dimensional, rule-based solution or a two-dimensional, information-integration solution. Humans strongly dimensionalized the stimuli and learned the rule-based task far more quickly. Six macaques showed the same performance advantage in the rule-based task. In humans, rule-based category learning is linked to explicit cognition, consciousness, and declarative reports about the contents of cognition. These results demonstrate an empirical continuity between human and nonhuman primate cognition, suggesting that nonhuman primates may have some structural components of humans' capacity for explicit cognition.

摘要

一种有影响力的理论观点认为,人类的类别学习存在一个明确的、基于规则的系统,它与一个隐性系统不同,该隐性系统会缓慢地将感知空间的不同区域与不同的反应输出联系起来。这一观点首次扩展到非人类灵长类动物的类别学习中。人类(智人)和猕猴(恒河猴)学习由正弦波光栅组成的类别,这些光栅在不同试验中条宽和条方向会发生变化。这些类别要么有一个单维的、基于规则的解决方案,要么有一个二维的、信息整合的解决方案。人类强烈地对刺激进行维度化,并更快地学习基于规则的任务。六只猕猴在基于规则的任务中表现出相同的性能优势。在人类中,基于规则的类别学习与明确的认知、意识以及关于认知内容的陈述性报告相关联。这些结果证明了人类和非人类灵长类动物认知之间的经验连续性,表明非人类灵长类动物可能具有人类明确认知能力的一些结构组成部分。

相似文献

7
Implicit and explicit categorization: a tale of four species.内隐和外显分类:四种物种的故事。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012 Nov;36(10):2355-69. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.09.003. Epub 2012 Sep 11.
9
Inferential Learning of Serial Order of Perceptual Categories by Rhesus Monkeys ().恒河猴对感知类别序列顺序的推理学习()
J Neurosci. 2017 Jun 28;37(26):6268-6276. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0263-17.2017. Epub 2017 May 25.
10
Pigeons' categorization may be exclusively nonanalytic.鸽子的分类可能完全是非分析的。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Apr;18(2):414-21. doi: 10.3758/s13423-010-0047-8.

引用本文的文献

2
Timescales of learning in prefrontal cortex.前额叶皮层的学习时间表。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2024 Sep;25(9):597-610. doi: 10.1038/s41583-024-00836-8. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
4
A Dissociative Framework for Understanding Same-Different Conceptualization.一个用于理解异同概念化的解离框架。
Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2021 Feb;37:13-18. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.06.004. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
5
Mouse prefrontal cortex represents learned rules for categorization.老鼠前额皮质代表了分类的习得规则。
Nature. 2021 May;593(7859):411-417. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03452-z. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
6
Linear separability, irrelevant variability, and categorization difficulty.线性可分性、无关变异性和分类难度。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2022 Feb;48(2):159-172. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001000. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
8
Arthropod Intelligence? The Case for .节肢动物的智力?关于……的案例
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 14;11:568049. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.568049. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

2
Prototype abstraction by monkeys (Macaca mulatta).猕猴(恒河猴)的原型抽象
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2008 May;137(2):390-401. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.137.2.390.
3
The formation of learning sets.学习集的形成。
Psychol Rev. 1949 Jan;56(1):51-65. doi: 10.1037/h0062474.
5
Human category learning.人类类别学习。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2005;56:149-78. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070217.
8
A theory of discrimination learning.一种辨别学习理论。
Psychol Rev. 1955 Jan;62(1):11-9. doi: 10.1037/h0046642.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验