• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

奖励概率对空间和时间变化的影响。

Effect of reward probability on spatial and temporal variation.

作者信息

Stahlman W David, Roberts Seth, Blaisdell Aaron P

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1563, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2010 Jan;36(1):77-91. doi: 10.1037/a0015971.

DOI:10.1037/a0015971
PMID:20141319
Abstract

Gharib, Derby, and Roberts (2001) proposed that reducing reward expectation increases variation of response form. We tested this rule in a new situation and asked if it also applied to variation of response location and timing. In 2 discrete-trial experiments, pigeons pecked colored circles for food. The circles were of 6 possible colors, each associated with a different probability of reward. Reducing reward expectation did not affect peck duration (a measure of form) but did increase horizontal variation of peck location and interpeck-interval variation. The effect of reward probability on the standard deviation of interpeck intervals was clearer (larger t value) than its effect on mean interpeck interval. Two datasets from rats had similar interresponse-interval effects.

摘要

加里布、德比和罗伯茨(2001年)提出,降低奖励期望会增加反应形式的变异性。我们在一种新情况下对这一规则进行了测试,并询问它是否也适用于反应位置和时间的变异性。在两项离散试验实验中,鸽子啄彩色圆圈以获取食物。圆圈有6种可能的颜色,每种颜色与不同的奖励概率相关联。降低奖励期望并未影响啄击持续时间(一种形式的度量),但确实增加了啄击位置的水平变异性和啄击间隔变异性。奖励概率对啄击间隔标准差的影响比对平均啄击间隔的影响更明显(t值更大)。来自大鼠的两个数据集有类似的反应间隔效应。

相似文献

1
Effect of reward probability on spatial and temporal variation.奖励概率对空间和时间变化的影响。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2010 Jan;36(1):77-91. doi: 10.1037/a0015971.
2
Reinforcement omission in concurrent fixed-interval and random-interval schedules.并发固定间隔和随机间隔时间表中的强化遗漏
Behav Processes. 2007 Mar;74(3):334-41. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.12.004. Epub 2006 Dec 20.
3
Variation of bar-press duration: where do new responses come from?压杆持续时间的变化:新的反应从何而来?
Behav Processes. 2006 Jun 1;72(3):215-23. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.03.003. Epub 2006 Mar 8.
4
Pigeons make errors as a result of interval timing in a visual, but not a visual-spatial, midsession reversal task.在视觉而非视觉空间的中期反转任务中,鸽子由于时间间隔计时而出现错误。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2012 Oct;38(4):440-5. doi: 10.1037/a0030192.
5
Reward magnitude and timing in pigeons.鸽子的奖励幅度和时机
Behav Processes. 2011 Mar;86(3):359-63. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2011.01.003. Epub 2011 Jan 16.
6
Contextual determinants of temporal control: Behavioral contrast in a free-operant psychophysical procedure.时间控制的情境决定因素:自由操作心理物理学程序中的行为对比
Behav Processes. 2006 Feb 28;71(2-3):157-63. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2005.11.005. Epub 2005 Dec 20.
7
Control of variation by reward probability.通过奖励概率控制变异
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2004 Oct;30(4):271-82. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.30.4.271.
8
Resurgence of time allocation.时间分配的复苏。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2017 Nov;108(3):398-413. doi: 10.1002/jeab.288. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
9
Response variability in pigeons in a Pavlovian task.鸽子在经典条件反射任务中的反应变异性。
Learn Behav. 2010 May;38(2):111-8. doi: 10.3758/LB.38.2.111.
10
Sources of variability and systematic error in mouse timing behavior.小鼠计时行为中的变异性和系统误差来源。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2004 Jan;30(1):3-16. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.30.1.3.

引用本文的文献

1
Interactions between motor exploration and reinforcement learning.运动探索与强化学习的相互作用。
J Neurophysiol. 2019 Aug 1;122(2):797-808. doi: 10.1152/jn.00390.2018. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
2
5-HT1a Receptor Involvement in Temporal Memory and the Response to Temporal Ambiguity.5-羟色胺1a受体在时间记忆及对时间模糊性的反应中的作用
Front Neurosci. 2018 Jul 3;12:439. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00439. eCollection 2018.
3
The Role of Variability in Motor Learning.变异性在运动学习中的作用。
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2017 Jul 25;40:479-498. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-072116-031548. Epub 2017 May 10.
4
Interval timing, temporal averaging, and cue integration.间隔计时、时间平均和线索整合。
Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2016 Apr;8:60-66. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.02.004.
5
Midsession shifts in reward probability and the control of behavioral variability.奖励概率的中期变化与行为变异性的控制
Learn Behav. 2016 Sep;44(3):270-82. doi: 10.3758/s13420-016-0211-8.
6
Extinction and spontaneous recovery of spatial behavior in pigeons.鸽子空间行为的消退与自发恢复
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2015 Oct;41(4):371-7. doi: 10.1037/xan0000076.
7
Reinforcement and induction of operant variability.操作性变异性的强化与诱导
Behav Anal. 2012 Fall;35(2):229-35. doi: 10.1007/BF03392281.
8
Adjunctive behaviors are operants.辅助行为是操作性行为。
Learn Behav. 2013 Mar;41(1):1-24. doi: 10.3758/s13420-012-0095-1.
9
View-invariance learning in object recognition by pigeons depends on error-driven associative learning processes.鸽子在物体识别中的视图不变性学习依赖于误差驱动的联想学习过程。
Vision Res. 2012 Jun 1;62:148-61. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.04.004. Epub 2012 Apr 17.
10
The Modulation of Operant Variation by the Probability, Magnitude, and Delay of Reinforcement.强化的概率、大小和延迟对操作性变异的调节
Learn Motiv. 2011 Aug 1;42(3):221-236. doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2011.05.001.