• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Patient expectations from implantable defibrillators to prevent death in heart failure.患者对植入式除颤器预防心力衰竭死亡的期望。
J Card Fail. 2010 Feb;16(2):106-13. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2009.09.003. Epub 2009 Nov 4.
2
Deactivation of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: results of patient surveys.植入式心脏复律除颤器的去激活:患者调查结果。
Europace. 2013 Jul;15(7):963-9. doi: 10.1093/europace/eus432. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
3
Disparity Between Indications for and Utilization of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators in Asian Patients With Heart Failure.亚洲心力衰竭患者植入式心脏复律除颤器的适应证与实际应用之间的差异
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017 Nov;10(11). doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003651.
4
Comparison of Inappropriate Shocks and Other Health Outcomes Between Single- and Dual-Chamber Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators for Primary Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death: Results From the Cardiovascular Research Network Longitudinal Study of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators.比较单腔和双腔植入式心脏复律除颤器在预防心源性猝死中的不适当电击和其他健康结局:心血管研究网络植入式心脏复律除颤器纵向研究的结果。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Nov 9;6(11):e006937. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006937.
5
Determinants of patient survival rate after implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator without resynchronisation capability.无再同步功能的心脏除颤器植入后患者生存率的决定因素。
Kardiol Pol. 2012;70(11):1099-110.
6
The Effects of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors on Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Shocks in Heart Failure Patients Undergoing Diuretic Therapy.钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂对接受利尿治疗的心力衰竭患者植入式心律转复除颤器电击的影响。
Med Princ Pract. 2025;34(2):179-190. doi: 10.1159/000542172. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
7
Implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Prophylactic use: an evidence-based analysis.植入式心脏复律除颤器。预防性应用:基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2005;5(14):1-74. Epub 2005 Sep 1.
8
Combining electrical therapies for advanced heart failure: the Milan experience with biventricular pacing-defibrillation backup combination for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death.联合电疗法治疗晚期心力衰竭:米兰双心室起搏-除颤备用组合用于心脏性猝死一级预防的经验
Am J Cardiol. 2003 May 8;91(9A):74F-80F. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(02)03341-6.
9
Seattle Heart Failure and Proportional Risk Models Predict Benefit From Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators.西雅图心力衰竭和比例风险模型预测植入式心脏复律除颤器的获益情况。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 May 30;69(21):2606-2618. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.03.568.
10
Avoiding Untimely Implantable Cardioverter/Defibrillator Implantation by Intensified Heart Failure Therapy Optimization Supported by the Wearable Cardioverter/Defibrillator-The PROLONG Study.可穿戴式心脏复律除颤器支持的强化心力衰竭治疗优化以避免过早植入植入式心脏复律除颤器——PROLONG研究
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Jan 17;6(1):e004512. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.004512.

引用本文的文献

1
Defibrillati|on|off.除颤关闭。
JACC Case Rep. 2025 Apr 16;30(8):103226. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2024.103226. Epub 2025 Mar 12.
2
The development of a decision aid for shared decision making in the Dutch implantable cardioverter defibrillator patient population: A novel approach to patient education.荷兰植入式心脏复律除颤器患者群体中用于共同决策的决策辅助工具的开发:一种患者教育的新方法。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 13;9:946404. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.946404. eCollection 2022.
3
The impact of government-mandated shared decision-making for implantable defibrillators: A natural experiment.政府强制实施的植入式除颤器共同决策的影响:一项自然实验。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2022 Feb;45(2):274-280. doi: 10.1111/pace.14414. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
4
Advance care planning and end-of-life care in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator: The perspective of relatives.植入式心脏复律除颤器患者的临终关怀规划及终末期护理:亲属的观点
Palliat Med. 2021 May;35(5):904-915. doi: 10.1177/02692163211001288. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
5
Development of a measure of decision quality for implantable defibrillators.植入式除颤器决策质量测量工具的研制。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2021 Apr;44(4):677-684. doi: 10.1111/pace.14189. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
6
2020 ACC/AHA Clinical Performance and Quality Measures for Adults With Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures.2020年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会心力衰竭成人患者临床绩效与质量指标:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会绩效指标特别工作组报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Nov 24;76(21):2527-2564. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.07.023. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
7
2020 ACC/AHA Clinical Performance and Quality Measures for Adults With Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures.2020年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会心力衰竭成人患者临床性能和质量指标:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会性能指标特别工作组报告
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Nov;13(11):e000099. doi: 10.1161/HCQ.0000000000000099. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
8
A Qualitative Analysis of Patient-Related Factors Associated With Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Acceptance.与植入式心脏复律除颤器接受度相关的患者相关因素的定性分析
Cardiol Ther. 2020 Dec;9(2):421-432. doi: 10.1007/s40119-020-00180-9. Epub 2020 May 31.
9
Decision-making regarding primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillators among older adults.老年人植入式心脏复律除颤器一级预防的决策。
Clin Cardiol. 2020 Feb;43(2):187-195. doi: 10.1002/clc.23315. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
10
Quality of Medical Advice Provided Between Members of a Web-Based Message Board for Patients With Implantable Defibrillators: Mixed-Methods Study.植入式心脏除颤器患者网络留言板成员间提供的医疗建议质量:混合方法研究。
JMIR Cardio. 2018 Dec 4;2(2):e11358. doi: 10.2196/11358.

本文引用的文献

1
Changing preferences for survival after hospitalization with advanced heart failure.晚期心力衰竭患者住院后生存偏好的变化。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Nov 18;52(21):1702-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.08.028.
2
A critical appraisal of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy for the prevention of sudden cardiac death.对植入式心脏复律除颤器预防心源性猝死治疗的批判性评价。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Sep 30;52(14):1111-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.05.058.
3
Prognostic importance of defibrillator shocks in patients with heart failure.除颤电击对心力衰竭患者的预后重要性。
N Engl J Med. 2008 Sep 4;359(10):1009-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa071098.
4
Quality of life with defibrillator therapy or amiodarone in heart failure.心力衰竭患者使用除颤器治疗或胺碘酮的生活质量
N Engl J Med. 2008 Sep 4;359(10):999-1008. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0706719.
5
Primary care patients' recognition of their own risk for cardiovascular disease: implications for risk communication in practice.基层医疗患者对自身心血管疾病风险的认知:对实际风险沟通的启示
Curr Opin Cardiol. 2008 Sep;23(5):471-6. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0b013e32830b35f6.
6
Predicting life expectancy in heart failure.预测心力衰竭患者的预期寿命。
JAMA. 2008 Jun 4;299(21):2566-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.21.2566.
7
Discordance between patient-predicted and model-predicted life expectancy among ambulatory patients with heart failure.门诊心力衰竭患者自我预测与模型预测的预期寿命之间的差异。
JAMA. 2008 Jun 4;299(21):2533-42. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.21.2533.
8
ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices): developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery and Society of Thoracic Surgeons.《美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会/心律学会2008年心脏节律异常器械治疗指南》:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组(修订ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002年心脏起搏器和抗心律失常器械植入指南更新的写作委员会)报告:与美国胸外科协会和胸外科医师学会合作制定。
Circulation. 2008 May 27;117(21):e350-408. doi: 10.1161/CIRCUALTIONAHA.108.189742. Epub 2008 May 15.
9
Patients prefer pictures to numbers to express cardiovascular benefit from treatment.患者更倾向于用图片而非数字来表达治疗对心血管的益处。
Ann Fam Med. 2008 May-Jun;6(3):213-7. doi: 10.1370/afm.795.
10
Inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks in MADIT II: frequency, mechanisms, predictors, and survival impact.多中心自动除颤器植入试验II中不适当的植入式心律转复除颤器电击:发生率、机制、预测因素及对生存的影响
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Apr 8;51(14):1357-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.09.073.

患者对植入式除颤器预防心力衰竭死亡的期望。

Patient expectations from implantable defibrillators to prevent death in heart failure.

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

出版信息

J Card Fail. 2010 Feb;16(2):106-13. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2009.09.003. Epub 2009 Nov 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.cardfail.2009.09.003
PMID:20142021
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4497779/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Indications for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) in heart failure (HF) are expanding and may include more than 1 million patients. This study examined patient expectations from ICDs for primary prevention of sudden death in HF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Study participants (n = 105) had an EF <35% and symptomatic HF, without history of ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation or syncope. Subjects completed a written survey about perceived ICD benefits, survival expectations, and circumstances under which they might deactivate defibrillation. Mean age was 58, LVEF 21%, 40% were New York Heart Association Class III-IV, and 65% already had a primary prevention ICD. Most patients anticipated more than10 years survival despite symptomatic HF. Nearly 54% expected an ICD to save >or=50 lives per 100 during 5 years. ICD recipients expressed more confidence that the device would save their own lives compared with those without an ICD (P < .001). Despite understanding the ease of deactivation, 70% of ICD recipients indicated they would keep the ICD on even if dying of cancer, 55% even if having daily shocks, and none would inactivate defibrillation even if suffering constant dyspnea at rest.

CONCLUSIONS

HF patients anticipate long survival, overestimate survival benefits conferred by ICDs, and express reluctance to deactivate their devices even for end-stage disease.

摘要

背景

植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)在心衰(HF)中的适应证正在扩大,可能包括超过 100 万患者。本研究探讨了 HF 患者对 ICD 进行一级预防心源性猝死的期望。

方法和结果

研究参与者(n = 105)EF <35%,有症状性 HF,无室性心动过速/颤动或晕厥病史。受试者完成了一份关于 ICD 感知益处、生存预期以及他们可能停用除颤的情况下的书面调查。平均年龄为 58 岁,LVEF 21%,40%为纽约心脏协会(NYHA)心功能分级 III-IV 级,65%已经有了一级预防 ICD。尽管有症状性 HF,大多数患者仍预计能存活超过 10 年。近 54%的患者预计 ICD 在 5 年内每 100 人能挽救>或=50 条生命。与没有 ICD 的患者相比,ICD 接受者表示对设备挽救自己生命的信心更大(P <.001)。尽管了解到 ICD 很容易停用,但 70%的 ICD 接受者表示即使死于癌症也会保留 ICD,55%即使每天都有电击也会保留,即使在休息时经常感到呼吸困难,也没有人会停用除颤。

结论

HF 患者预计能长期存活,高估了 ICD 带来的生存益处,并表示不愿停用设备,即使是在终末期疾病。