• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药物洗脱支架在静脉桥血管介入治疗中的应用:一项系统评价。

Drug-eluting stents in saphenous vein graft interventions: a systematic review.

机构信息

VA North Texas Healthcare System and University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.

出版信息

EuroIntervention. 2010 Jan;5(6):722-30. doi: 10.4244/eijv5i6a119.

DOI:10.4244/eijv5i6a119
PMID:20142225
Abstract

AIMS

A systematic review of the outcomes after drug-eluting stents (DES) implantation in saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) was performed.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The majority of the 33 published studies were retrospective with only two prospective randomised trials. Late loss and binary restenosis was reduced compared to bare metal stents (BMS) in all seven studies with angiographic follow-up. With the exception of one study there was no difference in mortality, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis between BMS and DES. The need for repeat target vessel or lesion revascularisation was lower in the DES arm in approximately half the published studies and similar in the remaining studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Until data from large, prospective, randomised-controlled studies become available, DES implantation in SVGs appears to be safe and, although not yet definitively proven, likely to reduce angiographic restenosis and the need for repeat target lesion revascularisation.

摘要

目的

对药物洗脱支架(DES)在静脉桥(SVG)中的应用效果进行了系统评价。

方法和结果

33 篇已发表的研究中,大多数为回顾性研究,仅有两项前瞻性随机试验。在所有七项具有血管造影随访的研究中,与金属裸支架(BMS)相比,晚期丢失和二元再狭窄均减少。除了一项研究外,BMS 和 DES 在死亡率、心肌梗死或支架血栓形成方面没有差异。在大约一半的已发表研究中,DES 组的再次靶血管或病变血运重建的需求较低,而在其余研究中则相似。

结论

在大型前瞻性随机对照研究数据公布之前,DES 在 SVG 中的应用似乎是安全的,尽管尚未得到明确证实,但可能会降低血管造影再狭窄和再次靶病变血运重建的需求。

相似文献

1
Drug-eluting stents in saphenous vein graft interventions: a systematic review.药物洗脱支架在静脉桥血管介入治疗中的应用:一项系统评价。
EuroIntervention. 2010 Jan;5(6):722-30. doi: 10.4244/eijv5i6a119.
2
Coronary artery stents: a rapid systematic review and economic evaluation.冠状动脉支架:一项快速系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2004 Sep;8(35):iii-iv, 1-242. doi: 10.3310/hta8350.
3
Drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in saphenous vein graft interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.药物洗脱支架与金属裸支架在静脉桥血管介入治疗中的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Dec;3(12):1262-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.08.019.
4
Comparison of Drug-Eluting Stents With Bare-Metal Stents for PCI of Saphenous Vein Graft Lesions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架用于隐静脉桥病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2016 Dec;28(12):E139-E169. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
5
Clinical outcomes of dialysis patients after implantation of DES: meta analysis and systematic review of literature.药物洗脱支架植入术后透析患者的临床结局:文献的荟萃分析与系统评价
Minerva Cardioangiol. 2009 Jun;57(3):291-7.
6
Drug-eluting stents: a systematic review and economic evaluation.药物洗脱支架:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(46):iii, xi-221. doi: 10.3310/hta11460.
7
Drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents for acute coronary syndrome.药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架治疗急性冠状动脉综合征的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 23;8(8):CD012481. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012481.pub2.
8
Drug eluting stents versus bare metal stents in the treatment of saphenous vein graft disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.药物洗脱支架与金属裸支架治疗大隐静脉桥病变的系统评价和荟萃分析。
EuroIntervention. 2010 Sep;6(4):527-36. doi: 10.4244/EIJ30V6I4A87.
9
Drug-eluting stents versus bare metal stents for angina or acute coronary syndromes.药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架治疗心绞痛或急性冠状动脉综合征的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 May 12(5):CD004587. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004587.pub2.
10
Comparison of Drug-Eluting Stent with Bare-Metal Stent Implantation in Femoropopliteal Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架植入治疗股腘动脉疾病的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2018 Jul;50:96-105. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.12.003. Epub 2018 Mar 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Native Artery Versus Bypass Graft in Patients with Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery.冠状动脉旁路移植术后患者行冠状动脉介入治疗:自体血管与移植血管的比较
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jun 24;23(7):232. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2307232. eCollection 2022 Jul.
2
Drug-Eluting Stent Restenosis: Modern Approach to a Classic Challenge.药物洗脱支架再狭窄:经典挑战的现代应对策略。
Curr Cardiol Rev. 2023;19(3):e030123212355. doi: 10.2174/1573403X19666230103154638.
3
Long-term outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in grafts and native vessels in coronary artery bypass grafting patients with diabetes mellitus.
糖尿病冠状动脉旁路移植术患者移植血管和自身血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的长期预后
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Nov;11(11):4798-4806. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.10.33.
4
Long-Term Outcome of Consecutive Patients With Previous Coronary Bypass Surgery, Treated With Newer-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents.既往冠状动脉旁路移植术后患者应用新一代药物洗脱支架的长期预后。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Jan 30;7(3):e007212. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007212.
5
Increased plasma chymase concentration and mast cell chymase expression in venous neointimal lesions of patients with CKD and ESRD.慢性肾脏病(CKD)和终末期肾病(ESRD)患者静脉内膜病变中血浆糜酶浓度升高及肥大细胞糜酶表达增加。
Semin Dial. 2011 Nov-Dec;24(6):688-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2011.00921.x. Epub 2011 Jul 22.