• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国与欧洲前列腺癌筛查随机研究-鹿特丹的前列腺特异性抗原筛查比较。

Prostate-specific antigen screening in the United States vs in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer-Rotterdam.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Mar 3;102(5):352-5. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp533. Epub 2010 Feb 8.

DOI:10.1093/jnci/djp533
PMID:20142584
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2831048/
Abstract

Dissemination of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing in the United States coincided with an increasing incidence of prostate cancer, a shift to earlier stage disease at diagnosis, and decreasing prostate cancer mortality. We compared PSA screening performance with respect to prostate cancer detection in the US population vs in the Rotterdam section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC-Rotterdam). We developed a simulation model for prostate cancer and PSA screening for ERSPC-Rotterdam. This model was then adapted to the US population by replacing demography parameters with US-specific ones and the screening protocol with the frequency of PSA tests in the US population. We assumed that the natural progression of prostate cancer and the sensitivity of a PSA test followed by a biopsy were the same in the United States as in ERSPC-Rotterdam. The predicted prostate cancer incidence peak in the United States was then substantially higher than the observed prostate cancer incidence peak (13.3 vs 8.1 cases per 1000 man-years). However, the actual observed incidence was reproduced by assuming a substantially lower PSA test sensitivity in the United States than in ERSPC-Rotterdam. For example, for nonpalpable local- or regional-stage cancers (ie, stage T1M0), the estimates of PSA test sensitivity were 0.26 in the United States vs 0.94 in ERSPC-Rotterdam. We conclude that the efficacy of PSA screening in detecting prostate cancer was lower in the United States than in ERSPC-Rotterdam.

摘要

在美国,前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测的传播与前列腺癌发病率的增加、诊断时疾病向早期阶段的转移以及前列腺癌死亡率的降低同时发生。我们比较了 PSA 筛查在检测美国人群和欧洲前列腺癌筛查随机研究(ERSPC-Rotterdam)的 Rotterdam 部分的前列腺癌方面的表现。我们为 ERSPC-Rotterdam 开发了一种前列腺癌和 PSA 筛查的模拟模型。然后,通过用美国特有的人口统计学参数替换人口统计学参数,并将筛查方案替换为美国人群中的 PSA 检测频率,使该模型适应美国人群。我们假设前列腺癌的自然进展和随后进行活检的 PSA 检测的敏感性在美国与 ERSPC-Rotterdam 相同。然后,美国预测的前列腺癌发病率高峰远高于实际观察到的前列腺癌发病率高峰(美国为每 1000 人年 13.3 例,而 ERSPC-Rotterdam 为 8.1 例)。然而,通过假设美国的 PSA 检测敏感性明显低于 ERSPC-Rotterdam,实际观察到的发病率得到了重现。例如,对于不可触及的局部或区域阶段癌症(即 T1M0 期),PSA 检测敏感性的估计值在美国为 0.26,而在 ERSPC-Rotterdam 为 0.94。我们的结论是,PSA 筛查在检测前列腺癌方面的效果在美国低于 ERSPC-Rotterdam。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa03/2831048/3f790cf75412/jncidjp533f02_ht.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa03/2831048/1ba35678ce7d/jncidjp533f01_lw.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa03/2831048/3f790cf75412/jncidjp533f02_ht.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa03/2831048/1ba35678ce7d/jncidjp533f01_lw.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa03/2831048/3f790cf75412/jncidjp533f02_ht.jpg

相似文献

1
Prostate-specific antigen screening in the United States vs in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer-Rotterdam.美国与欧洲前列腺癌筛查随机研究-鹿特丹的前列腺特异性抗原筛查比较。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Mar 3;102(5):352-5. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp533. Epub 2010 Feb 8.
2
Lead time and overdiagnosis in prostate-specific antigen screening: importance of methods and context.前列腺特异性抗原筛查中的提前期和过度诊断:方法及背景的重要性
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Mar 18;101(6):374-83. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp001. Epub 2009 Mar 10.
3
The efficacy of prostate-specific antigen screening: Impact of key components in the ERSPC and PLCO trials.前列腺特异性抗原筛查的疗效:ERSPC 和 PLCO 试验中关键因素的影响。
Cancer. 2018 Mar 15;124(6):1197-1206. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31178. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
4
Effective PSA contamination in the Rotterdam section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer.欧洲前列腺癌筛查随机研究鹿特丹部分中的有效前列腺特异性抗原污染情况。
Int J Cancer. 2003 Jun 20;105(3):394-9. doi: 10.1002/ijc.11074.
5
Interval cancers in prostate cancer screening: comparing 2- and 4-year screening intervals in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer, Gothenburg and Rotterdam.前列腺癌筛查中的间期癌:在哥德堡和鹿特丹进行的欧洲前列腺癌筛查随机研究中比较2年和4年的筛查间隔
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 Sep 5;99(17):1296-303. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djm101. Epub 2007 Aug 28.
6
Features and preliminary results of the Dutch centre of the ERSPC (Rotterdam, the Netherlands).欧洲前列腺癌筛查研究(ERSPC)荷兰中心(荷兰鹿特丹)的特点及初步结果。
BJU Int. 2003 Dec;92 Suppl 2:48-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2003.04390.x.
7
Detection of prostate cancer: the impact of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC).前列腺癌的检测:欧洲前列腺癌筛查随机研究(ERSPC)的影响
Can J Urol. 2005 Feb;12 Suppl 1:2-6; discussion 92-3.
8
Efficacy vs effectiveness in prostate-specific antigen screening.前列腺特异性抗原筛查中的效能与效果
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Mar 3;102(5):288-9. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq002. Epub 2010 Feb 8.
9
Is it necessary to detect all prostate cancers in men with serum PSA levels <3.0 ng/ml? A comparison of biopsy results of PCPT and outcome-related information from ERSPC.对于血清前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平<3.0 ng/ml的男性,有必要检测出所有前列腺癌吗?前列腺癌预防试验(PCPT)活检结果与欧洲前列腺癌筛查随机研究(ERSPC)结局相关信息的比较
Eur Urol. 2008 May;53(5):901-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.01.048. Epub 2008 Jan 28.
10
Prostate-specific antigen-based prostate cancer screening: reduction of prostate cancer mortality after correction for nonattendance and contamination in the Rotterdam section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer.基于前列腺特异性抗原的前列腺癌筛查:校正欧洲前列腺癌筛查随机研究鹿特丹部分失访和污染后,前列腺癌死亡率降低。
Eur Urol. 2014 Feb;65(2):329-36. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.08.005. Epub 2013 Aug 11.

引用本文的文献

1
UPDATE - 2022 Canadian Urological Association recommendations on prostate cancer screening and early diagnosis Endorsement of the 2021 Cancer Care Ontario guidelines on prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.更新 - 2022年加拿大泌尿外科协会关于前列腺癌筛查和早期诊断的建议 认可2021年安大略癌症护理关于前列腺多参数磁共振成像的指南。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2022 Apr;16(4):E184-E196. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.7851.
2
Cost-effectiveness of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and MRI-guided biopsy in a population-based prostate cancer screening setting using a micro-simulation model.基于微观模拟模型的多参数磁共振成像和 MRI 引导活检在基于人群的前列腺癌筛查中的成本效益。
Cancer Med. 2021 Jun;10(12):4046-4053. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3932. Epub 2021 May 15.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study.一项欧洲随机研究中的筛查与前列腺癌死亡率
N Engl J Med. 2009 Mar 26;360(13):1320-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810084. Epub 2009 Mar 18.
2
Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial.一项前列腺癌随机筛查试验的死亡率结果。
N Engl J Med. 2009 Mar 26;360(13):1310-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810696. Epub 2009 Mar 18.
3
Lead time and overdiagnosis in prostate-specific antigen screening: importance of methods and context.前列腺特异性抗原筛查中的提前期和过度诊断:方法及背景的重要性
The Impact of Intensifying Prostate Cancer Screening in Black Men: A Model-Based Analysis.强化黑人男性前列腺癌筛查的影响:基于模型的分析。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 Oct 1;113(10):1336-1342. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djab072.
4
The comparative effectiveness of mpMRI and MRI-guided biopsy vs regular biopsy in a population-based PSA testing: a modeling study.基于 PSA 检测的人群中,mpMRI 和 MRI 引导活检与常规活检的比较效果:一项建模研究。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 19;11(1):1801. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81459-2.
5
Assessment of harms, benefits, and cost-effectiveness of prostate cancer screening: A micro-simulation study of 230 scenarios.前列腺癌筛查的危害、益处和成本效益评估:230 种情景的微观模拟研究。
Cancer Med. 2020 Oct;9(20):7742-7750. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3395. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
6
Cost-effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Population-based Breast Cancer Screening: A Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis.基于人群的乳腺癌筛查中数字乳腺断层合成的成本效益:概率敏感性分析。
Radiology. 2020 Oct;297(1):40-48. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020192505. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
7
Lifetime Benefits and Harms of Prostate-Specific Antigen-Based Risk-Stratified Screening for Prostate Cancer.基于前列腺特异性抗原的风险分层前列腺癌筛查的终生获益和危害。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020 Oct 1;112(10):1013-1020. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaa001.
8
A natural history model for planning prostate cancer testing: Calibration and validation using Swedish registry data.用于规划前列腺癌检测的自然史模型:使用瑞典登记数据进行校准和验证。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 14;14(2):e0211918. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211918. eCollection 2019.
9
Recommandations de l'Association des urologues du Canada sur le dépistage et le diagnostic précoce du cancer de la prostate.加拿大泌尿外科协会关于前列腺癌筛查和早期诊断的建议。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2017 Oct;11(10):298-309. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.4888.
10
The efficacy of prostate-specific antigen screening: Impact of key components in the ERSPC and PLCO trials.前列腺特异性抗原筛查的疗效:ERSPC 和 PLCO 试验中关键因素的影响。
Cancer. 2018 Mar 15;124(6):1197-1206. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31178. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Mar 18;101(6):374-83. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp001. Epub 2009 Mar 10.
4
Prostate cancer screening in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian cancer screening trial: update on findings from the initial four rounds of screening in a randomized trial.前列腺、肺、结肠直肠和卵巢癌筛查试验中的前列腺癌筛查:随机试验前四轮筛查结果的最新情况
BJU Int. 2008 Dec;102(11):1524-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08214.x.
5
Reconstructing PSA testing patterns between black and white men in the US from Medicare claims and the National Health Interview Survey.利用医疗保险理赔数据和美国国家健康访谈调查,重建美国黑人和白人男性之间的前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测模式。
Cancer. 2007 May 1;109(9):1877-86. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22607.
6
Gleason score, age and screening: modeling dedifferentiation in prostate cancer.格里森评分、年龄与筛查:前列腺癌去分化建模
Int J Cancer. 2006 Nov 15;119(10):2366-71. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22158.
7
Prostate biopsy following a positive screen in the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian cancer screening trial.在前列腺、肺、结肠直肠和卵巢癌筛查试验中筛查结果呈阳性后进行前列腺活检。
J Urol. 2005 Mar;173(3):746-50; discussion 750-1. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000152697.25708.71.
8
Lead times and overdetection due to prostate-specific antigen screening: estimates from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer.前列腺特异性抗原筛查的提前期和过度诊断:来自欧洲前列腺癌筛查随机研究的估计
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003 Jun 18;95(12):868-78. doi: 10.1093/jnci/95.12.868.
9
The role of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing patterns in the recent prostate cancer incidence decline in the United States.前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测模式在美国近期前列腺癌发病率下降中所起的作用。
Cancer Causes Control. 1998 Oct;9(5):519-27. doi: 10.1023/a:1008805718310.
10
Classification of prostatic carcinomas.前列腺癌的分类。
Cancer Chemother Rep. 1966 Mar;50(3):125-8.