• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Development of a Walking Safety Scale for Older Adults, Part I: Content Validity of the GEM Scale.老年人步行安全量表的研制,第一部分:GEM量表的内容效度
Physiother Can. 2008 Summer;60(3):264-73. doi: 10.3138/physio.60.3.264. Epub 2008 Oct 10.
2
Development of a Walking-Safety Scale for Older Adults, Part II: Interrater and Test-Retest Agreement of the GEM Scale.老年人步行安全量表的研制,第二部分:GEM量表的评分者间信度和重测信度
Physiother Can. 2008 Summer;60(3):274-82. doi: 10.3138/physio.60.3.274. Epub 2008 Oct 10.
3
Factorial validation of a walking safety scale (GEM scale) for the geriatric population.老年人群行走安全量表(GEM 量表)的因子验证。
Physiother Theory Pract. 2010 Apr 22;26(3):173-83. doi: 10.3109/09593980902750725.
4
When Educational Material Is Delivered: A Mixed Methods Content Validation Study of the Information Assessment Method.教育材料的交付时间:信息评估方法的混合方法内容效度研究。
JMIR Med Educ. 2017 Mar 14;3(1):e4. doi: 10.2196/mededu.6415.
5
Development and psychometric properties of the ambulatory self-confidence questionnaire.动态自信问卷的编制与心理测量学特性
Gerontology. 2007;53(6):373-81. doi: 10.1159/000104830. Epub 2007 Jun 29.
6
Content Validity and Psychometric Characteristics of the "Knowledge about Older Patients Quiz" for Nurses Using Item Response Theory.基于项目反应理论的护士“老年患者知识测验”的内容效度和心理测量学特征。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Nov;64(11):2378-2383. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14476. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
7
Construction and pilot assessment of the Lower Limb Function Assessment Scale.下肢功能评估量表的构建与初步评估
NeuroRehabilitation. 2014;35(4):729-39. doi: 10.3233/NRE-141171.
8
Walking skill can be assessed in older adults: validity of the Figure-of-8 Walk Test.老年人的步行技能可以进行评估:8 字形步行测试的有效性。
Phys Ther. 2010 Jan;90(1):89-99. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20080121. Epub 2009 Dec 3.
9
Instrument validation process: a case study using the Paediatric Pain Knowledge and Attitudes Questionnaire.仪器验证过程:使用《儿科疼痛知识与态度问卷》的案例研究
J Clin Nurs. 2016 Jun;25(11-12):1566-75. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13130. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
10
Concurrent Validity of the Zeno Walkway for Measuring Spatiotemporal Gait Parameters in Older Adults.《Zenowalk 步速仪测量老年人时空步态参数的同时效度》。
J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2019 Jul/Sep;42(3):E42-E50. doi: 10.1519/JPT.0000000000000168.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a Walking-Safety Scale for Older Adults, Part II: Interrater and Test-Retest Agreement of the GEM Scale.老年人步行安全量表的研制,第二部分:GEM量表的评分者间信度和重测信度
Physiother Can. 2008 Summer;60(3):274-82. doi: 10.3138/physio.60.3.274. Epub 2008 Oct 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical gait and balance scale (GABS): validation and utilization.临床步态与平衡量表(GABS):验证与应用
J Neurol Sci. 2004 Jan 15;217(1):89-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2003.09.005.
2
Development and reliability of the General Motor Function Assessment Scale (GMF)--a performance-based measure of function-related dependence, pain and insecurity.通用运动功能评估量表(GMF)的开发与信效度——一种基于表现的功能相关依赖、疼痛和不安全感测量方法
Disabil Rehabil. 2003 May 6;25(9):462-72. doi: 10.1080/0963828031000069762.
3
Ambulatory devices for chronic gait disorders in the elderly.老年人慢性步态障碍的门诊治疗设备。
Am Fam Physician. 2003 Apr 15;67(8):1717-24.
4
Toward a better understanding of gait changes with age and disablement: neuromuscular adaptation.为了更好地理解步态随年龄和残疾的变化:神经肌肉适应性。
Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2003 Apr;31(2):102-8. doi: 10.1097/00003677-200304000-00009.
5
Methods to assess and improve the physical parameters associated with fall risk in older adults.评估和改善与老年人跌倒风险相关身体参数的方法。
Prev Med. 2003 Mar;36(3):255-64. doi: 10.1016/s0091-7435(02)00028-2.
6
Use of the "fast evaluation of mobility, balance, and fear" in elderly community dwellers: validity and reliability.
Phys Ther. 1997 Sep;77(9):904-17. doi: 10.1093/ptj/77.9.904.
7
Fear of falling and restriction of mobility in elderly fallers.老年跌倒者对跌倒的恐惧及活动受限。
Age Ageing. 1997 May;26(3):189-93. doi: 10.1093/ageing/26.3.189.
8
The obstacle course: a tool for the assessment of functional balance and mobility in the elderly.障碍课程:一种评估老年人功能平衡和活动能力的工具。
J Rehabil Res Dev. 1996 Oct;33(4):413-29.
9
Functional assessment of balance and gait.平衡和步态的功能评估。
Clin Geriatr Med. 1996 Nov;12(4):705-23.
10
Gait disorders in older adults.老年人的步态障碍
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1996 Apr;44(4):434-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1996.tb06417.x.

老年人步行安全量表的研制,第一部分:GEM量表的内容效度

Development of a Walking Safety Scale for Older Adults, Part I: Content Validity of the GEM Scale.

作者信息

Kaegi Christine, Boudreault Renée, Rousseau Jacqueline, Bourbonnais Daniel, Nadeau Sylvie, Dubé François

机构信息

Christine Kaegi, PT: Institut universitaire de gériatrie de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec.

出版信息

Physiother Can. 2008 Summer;60(3):264-73. doi: 10.3138/physio.60.3.264. Epub 2008 Oct 10.

DOI:10.3138/physio.60.3.264
PMID:20145759
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2792775/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The Grille d'évaluation de la sécurité à la marche (GEM scale) is a performance-based tool developed to fill the need for an objective assessment of walking safety for older adults. It underwent a three-phase process of content validation.

METHOD

A mailed questionnaire was used to assess the representativeness of the walking items (5-point pertinence scale). Subsequently, two physiotherapist focus groups (n = 20) were held to further evaluate the relevance of the scale and the walking items. Finally, a pilot study was completed with 3 raters administering the GEM scale to 12 hospitalized patients.

RESULTS

Comments and descriptive statistics (percentages) were analyzed from the questionnaire results and focus groups. On completion of the pilot study, which assessed 12 patients on the GEM scale, additional analyses were performed to address the theoretical background, the administration manual, the walking items, the scoring scale, and interpretation of the scale. Following each step, modifications were made to reflect the results of the analyses.

CONCLUSION

The three-phase content-validation process demonstrated the relevance of this instrument and its representativeness as a walking safety assessment tool for older adults.

摘要

目的

步行安全评估量表(GEM量表)是一种基于表现的工具,旨在满足对老年人步行安全进行客观评估的需求。它经历了一个由三个阶段组成的内容效度验证过程。

方法

采用邮寄问卷来评估步行项目的代表性(5分相关性量表)。随后,举办了两个物理治疗师焦点小组(n = 20),以进一步评估该量表及步行项目的相关性。最后,完成了一项预试验研究,由3名评估者对12名住院患者使用GEM量表。

结果

对问卷结果和焦点小组的评论及描述性统计数据(百分比)进行了分析。在完成对12名患者进行GEM量表评估的预试验研究后,进行了额外分析,以探讨理论背景、使用手册、步行项目、评分量表以及量表的解读。在每个步骤之后,都进行了修改以反映分析结果。

结论

三个阶段的内容效度验证过程证明了该工具的相关性及其作为老年人步行安全评估工具的代表性。