BC Injury Research and Prevention Unit, Developmental Neurosciences and Child Health: Neurons to Neighbourhoods, Formerly Centre for Community Child Health Research, BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2010 Feb;11(1):48-56. doi: 10.1080/15389580903390623.
Pedestrian crashes present a growing challenge for public health trauma and road safety researchers around the world. They are associated with substantial morbidity, mortality, and cost, yet there is an international lack of published work on the topic, especially when compared with vehicle occupant safety studies. Our review attempts to quantify the risk of fatal injury among vulnerable road users. The specific objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to quantify and compare the impact of light truck vehicles (LTVs) versus conventional cars on pedestrian fatal injury.
A protocol was developed using methods of the Cochrane Collaboration. We conducted a search for the studies in bibliographic databases that included ATI (Australian Transport Index); Cochrane Injuries Group Specialized Register; EMBASE; ERIC; MEDLINE; National Research Register; PsycINFO; Road Res (ARRB); SIGLE; Science (and Social Science) Citation Index; TRANSPORT (NTIS, TRIS, TRANSDOC, IRRD). Web sites of traffic and road accident research bodies, government agencies, and injury prevention organizations were searched for grey literature. Reference lists from selected papers or topic reviews were scanned for potentially relevant papers.
Our initial search identified 878 potentially eligible studies. After thorough review by three of the researchers a total of 12 studies were included in the systematic review, 11 of which were included in the meta-analysis. The overall pooled odds ratio for the risk of fatal injury in pedestrian collisions with LTVs compared to conventional cars was odds ratio 1.54, 95 percent confidence interval 1.15-1.93, p = 0.001. Thus, the risk for pedestrians of sustaining fatal injury is 50 percent greater in collisions with LTVs than in collisions with conventional cars.
Our systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that LTVs pose a greater risk of pedestrian injury death compared to conventional cars. These findings have important implications for the automotive industry and the safety of vulnerable road users.
行人事故对全球公共卫生创伤和道路安全研究人员构成了日益严峻的挑战。这些事故与大量的发病率、死亡率和成本有关,但与车辆乘员安全研究相比,国际上对此类事故的研究工作却相对较少。本综述旨在量化弱势道路使用者发生致命伤害的风险。本系统评价和荟萃分析的具体目的是量化和比较轻型卡车(LTV)与传统汽车对行人致命伤害的影响。
采用 Cochrane 协作组的方法制定方案。我们在包括 ATI(澳大利亚交通索引);Cochrane 伤害组专业登记册;EMBASE;ERIC;MEDLINE;国家研究登记册;PsycINFO;Road Res(ARRB);SIGLE;科学(和社会科学)引文索引;TRANSPORT(NTIS、TRIS、TRANSDOC、IRRD)在内的文献数据库中搜索研究。还搜索了交通和道路事故研究机构、政府机构和伤害预防组织的灰色文献网站。对选定论文或主题评论的参考文献列表进行了扫描,以寻找可能相关的论文。
初步搜索确定了 878 项潜在合格研究。经过三位研究人员的仔细审查,共有 12 项研究纳入系统评价,其中 11 项研究纳入荟萃分析。与传统汽车相比,LTV 与行人碰撞的致命伤害风险的总体合并优势比为 1.54,95%置信区间为 1.15-1.93,p=0.001。因此,行人与 LTV 发生碰撞导致致命伤害的风险比与传统汽车碰撞高出 50%。
我们的系统评价和荟萃分析表明,与传统汽车相比,LTV 对行人受伤死亡的风险更大。这些发现对汽车行业和弱势道路使用者的安全具有重要意义。