Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA 15201, USA.
Child Maltreat. 2010 May;15(2):144-51. doi: 10.1177/1077559509360250. Epub 2010 Feb 10.
Current theories suggest that all children in a home are at risk for physical abuse, when one child is abused. However, little evidence exists to guide decisions regarding the medical management of siblings of physically abused children (contact children [CC]). This study sought to compare child protective services (CPS) caseworkers' and child abuse physicians' (CAP) recommendations regarding the need for medical evaluation of CC in case scenarios of unequivocal physical abuse. In all cases, caseworkers and physicians disagreed on which CC warranted a medical evaluation. In addition, 25% of caseworkers did not think that physicians should make recommendations on the need for medical evaluation of CC. The findings of the authors suggest that the home visit is a critical part of the decision-making process for caseworkers and that it often acts as a substitute for a medical evaluation. Caseworkers indicated that visible injury to the contact child and severity of injury to the index child were among the most important factors in deciding which CC need a medical evaluation. Although caseworkers and physicians disagree on certain issues related to the evaluation of CC, it is clear that limited resources should be directed at CC at highest risk for physical abuse.
目前的理论认为,当一个孩子受到虐待时,家中所有的孩子都有遭受身体虐待的风险。然而,几乎没有证据可以指导对遭受身体虐待儿童(接触儿童[CC])的医疗管理决策。本研究旨在比较儿童保护服务(CPS)工作人员和儿童虐待医师(CAP)对明确身体虐待情况下 CC 进行医疗评估的必要性的建议。在所有情况下,工作人员和医生都不同意哪些 CC 需要进行医疗评估。此外,25%的工作人员认为医生不应该就 CC 是否需要进行医疗评估提出建议。作者的研究结果表明,家访是工作人员决策过程的关键部分,它通常可以替代医疗评估。工作人员表示,接触儿童身上可见的伤害以及主要儿童受伤的严重程度是决定哪些 CC 需要进行医疗评估的最重要因素之一。尽管工作人员和医生在与 CC 评估相关的某些问题上存在分歧,但很明显,应将有限的资源集中用于最有可能遭受身体虐待的 CC。