Blakely Tony, Richardson Ken, Young Jim, Callister Paul, Didham Robert
Department of Public Health, Wellington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Otago, PO Box 7343, Wellington, New Zealand.
N Z Med J. 2009 Dec 11;122(1307):18-29.
BACKGROUND Pacific mortality rates are traditionally presented for all Pacific people combined, yet there is likely heterogeneity between separate Pacific ethnic groups. We aimed to determine mortality rates for Samoan, Cook Island Māori, Tongan, and Niuean ethnic groups (living in New Zealand). METHODS We used New Zealand Census-Mortality Study (NZCMS) data for 2001-04, for 380,000 person years of follow-up of 0-74 year olds in the 2001-04 cohort for which there was complete data on sex, age, ethnicity (total counts), natality, and household income. Given sparse data, we used hierarchical Bayesian (HB) regression modelling, with: a prior covariate structure specified for sex, age, natality (New Zealand/Overseas born), and household income; and smoothing of rates using shrinkage. The posterior mortality rate estimates were then directly standardised.RESULTS Standardising for sex, age, income, and natality, all-cause mortality rate ratios compared to Samoan were: 1.21 (95% credibility interval 1.05 to 1.42) for Cook Island Māori; 0.93 (0.77 to 1.10) for Tongan; and 1.07 (0.88 to 1.29) for Niuean. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality rate ratios showed greater heterogeneity: 1.66 (1.26 to 2.13) for Cook Island Māori; 1.11 (0.72 to 1.58) for Niuean; and 0.86 (0.58 to 1.20) for Tongan. Results were little different standardising for just sex and age. We conducted a range of sensitivity analyses about a plausible range of (differential) return migration by Pacific people when terminally ill, and a plausible range of census undercounting of Pacific people. Our findings, in particular the elevated CVD mortality among Cook Island Māori, appeared robust. CONCLUSIONS To our knowledge, this project is the first time in New Zealand that clear (and marked in the case of CVD) differences in mortality have been demonstrated between different Pacific ethnic groups. Future health research and policy should, wherever possible and practicable, evaluate and incorporate heterogeneity of health status among Pacific people.
传统上呈现的是所有太平洋岛民的合并死亡率,但不同太平洋族裔群体之间可能存在异质性。我们旨在确定萨摩亚族、库克群岛毛利族、汤加族和纽埃族(居住在新西兰)的死亡率。方法:我们使用了2001 - 2004年新西兰人口普查 - 死亡率研究(NZCMS)的数据,对2001 - 2004年队列中0 - 74岁人群进行了380,000人年的随访,该队列在性别、年龄、族裔(总计数)、出生情况和家庭收入方面有完整数据。鉴于数据稀疏,我们使用分层贝叶斯(HB)回归模型,其具有:为性别、年龄、出生情况(新西兰出生/海外出生)和家庭收入指定的先验协变量结构;以及使用收缩法对率进行平滑处理。然后对后验死亡率估计值进行直接标准化。结果:在对性别、年龄、收入和出生情况进行标准化后,与萨摩亚族相比,全因死亡率比值分别为:库克群岛毛利族为1.21(95%可信区间1.05至1.42);汤加族为0.93(0.77至1.10);纽埃族为1.07(0.88至1.29)。心血管疾病(CVD)死亡率比值显示出更大的异质性:库克群岛毛利族为1.66(1.26至2.13);纽埃族为1.11(0.72至1.58);汤加族为0.86(0.58至1.20)。仅对性别和年龄进行标准化时结果差异不大。我们针对太平洋岛民在身患绝症时可能的(差异)返乡移民范围以及太平洋岛民在人口普查中可能的漏计范围进行了一系列敏感性分析。我们的研究结果,特别是库克群岛毛利族中升高的心血管疾病死亡率,似乎是稳健的。结论:据我们所知,该项目是新西兰首次证明不同太平洋族裔群体之间在死亡率上存在明显差异(心血管疾病方面差异显著)。未来的健康研究和政策应尽可能且切实可行地评估并纳入太平洋岛民健康状况的异质性。