• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从美国支付方角度看奥马珠单抗治疗未控制哮喘的成本与后果。

The costs and consequences of omalizumab in uncontrolled asthma from a USA payer perspective.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO, USA.

出版信息

Allergy. 2010 Sep;65(9):1141-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2010.02336.x. Epub 2010 Feb 10.

DOI:10.1111/j.1398-9995.2010.02336.x
PMID:20148804
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Omalizumab, an anti-immunoglobulin E antibody, reduces exacerbations and symptoms in uncontrolled allergic asthma. The study objective was to estimate the costs and consequences of omalizumab compared to usual care from a US payer perspective.

METHODS

We estimated payer costs, quality-adjusted survival (QALYs), and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of omalizumab compared to usual care using a state-transition simulation model that included sensitivity analyses. Every 2 weeks, patients could transition between chronic asthma and exacerbation health states. The best available evidence informed the clinical and cost input estimates. Five years of omalizumab treatment followed by usual care was assumed to estimate a lifetime horizon. Omalizumab responders (60.5% of treated) were modeled as a separate scenario where nonresponders reverted back to usual care after 16 weeks of active treatment.

RESULTS

The mean lifetime discounted costs and QALYs were $83,400 and 13.87 for usual care and $174,500 and 14.19 for omalizumab plus usual care resulting in $287 200/QALY (95% interval: $219,300, $557, 900). The ICER was $172 300/QALY when comparing omalizumab to usual care in the responder scenario. One-way sensitivity analyses indicated that the results were sensitive to the difference in treatment-specific utilities for the chronic state, exacerbation-associated mortality, omalizumab price, exacerbation rates, and response definition.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that adding omalizumab to usual care improves QALYs at an increase in direct medical costs. The cost-effectiveness of omalizumab is similar to other chronic disease biologics. The value increases when omalizumab response is used to guide long-term treatment.

摘要

背景

奥马珠单抗是一种抗免疫球蛋白 E 抗体,可减少未控制的过敏性哮喘的恶化和症状。研究目的是从美国支付者的角度评估奥马珠单抗与常规护理相比的成本和结果。

方法

我们使用状态转换模拟模型来估计奥马珠单抗与常规护理相比的支付者成本、质量调整生存(QALY)和增量成本效益比(ICER),并进行敏感性分析。每两周,患者可能会在慢性哮喘和恶化健康状态之间转换。最佳可用证据为临床和成本投入提供了信息。假设奥马珠单抗治疗 5 年,然后是常规护理,以估计终生。奥马珠单抗应答者(治疗组的 60.5%)被建模为一个单独的方案,其中无应答者在积极治疗 16 周后恢复到常规护理。

结果

常规护理的平均终生贴现成本和 QALY 为 83400 美元和 13.87,奥马珠单抗加常规护理为 174500 美元和 14.19,导致每 QALY 花费 287300 美元(95%区间:219300 美元,557900 美元)。在应答者方案中,奥马珠单抗与常规护理相比,ICER 为 172300 美元/QALY。单因素敏感性分析表明,结果对慢性状态特定治疗效用、恶化相关死亡率、奥马珠单抗价格、恶化率和反应定义的差异敏感。

结论

结果表明,在常规护理的基础上添加奥马珠单抗可提高 QALY,同时增加直接医疗成本。奥马珠单抗的成本效益与其他慢性疾病生物制剂相似。当使用奥马珠单抗反应来指导长期治疗时,其价值会增加。

相似文献

1
The costs and consequences of omalizumab in uncontrolled asthma from a USA payer perspective.从美国支付方角度看奥马珠单抗治疗未控制哮喘的成本与后果。
Allergy. 2010 Sep;65(9):1141-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2010.02336.x. Epub 2010 Feb 10.
2
The economic value of anti-IgE in severe persistent, IgE-mediated (allergic) asthma patients: adaptation of INNOVATE to Sweden.抗IgE在重度持续性、IgE介导的(过敏性)哮喘患者中的经济价值:将INNOVATE研究适配于瑞典
Curr Med Res Opin. 2006 Sep;22(9):1765-76. doi: 10.1185/030079906X132389.
3
Omalizumab for the treatment of severe persistent allergic asthma.奥马珠单抗治疗严重持续性过敏性哮喘。
Health Technol Assess. 2009 Sep;13 Suppl 2:31-9. doi: 10.3310/hta13suppl2/05.
4
Cost-effectiveness of omalizumab in patients with severe persistent allergic asthma.奥马珠单抗治疗重度持续性过敏性哮喘患者的成本效益
Allergy. 2007 Feb;62(2):149-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2006.01310.x.
5
Omalizumab for the treatment of severe persistent allergic asthma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.奥马珠单抗治疗严重持续性过敏性哮喘:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2013 Nov;17(52):1-342. doi: 10.3310/hta17520.
6
Optimizing the position and use of omalizumab for severe persistent allergic asthma using cost-effectiveness analysis.使用成本效益分析优化奥马珠单抗在重度持续性过敏性哮喘中的使用位置及应用
Value Health. 2014 Dec;17(8):772-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.07.009. Epub 2014 Oct 11.
7
Cost-effectiveness of omalizumab for uncontrolled allergic asthma in the Netherlands.奥马珠单抗治疗荷兰未控制的过敏性哮喘的成本效益分析。
J Med Econ. 2013;16(3):342-8. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2012.756398. Epub 2012 Dec 18.
8
Cost-effectiveness of omalizumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe uncontrolled allergic asthma in the United States.奥马珠单抗治疗美国中重度未控制的过敏性哮喘的成本效果分析。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2020 Jan;36(1):23-32. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2019.1660539. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
9
Cost-effectiveness of omalizumab in severe persistent asthma in Spain: a real-life perspective.奥马珠单抗在西班牙重度持续性哮喘治疗中的成本效益:基于现实生活的视角
J Asthma. 2015 Mar;52(2):205-10. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2014.941474. Epub 2014 Nov 24.
10
A 36-month study on the cost/utility of add-on omalizumab in persistent difficult-to-treat atopic asthma in Italy.一项关于在意大利持续性难治性特应性哮喘中添加奥马珠单抗的成本/效用的36个月研究。
J Asthma. 2012 Oct;49(8):843-8. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2012.717659. Epub 2012 Sep 7.

引用本文的文献

1
A cost-effectiveness analysis comparing single-inhaler extrafine beclomethasone/formoterol/glycopyrronium bromide against other SITTs in adult patients with uncontrolled asthma in England.一项成本效益分析,比较单吸入器布地奈德/福莫特罗/格隆溴铵超细粉与其他长效吸入型支气管扩张剂治疗英国未控制哮喘成年患者的效果。
Health Econ Rev. 2025 May 23;15(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13561-025-00640-9.
2
Role of clinical biomarkers in predicting the effectiveness of omalizumab.临床生物标志物在预测奥马珠单抗疗效中的作用。
Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2023 Jan-Dec;17:17534666231170821. doi: 10.1177/17534666231170821.
3
The pharmacoeconomics of the state-of-the-art drug treatments for asthma: a systematic review.
哮喘最新药物治疗的药物经济学:一项系统评价。
Multidiscip Respir Med. 2021 Aug 2;16(1):787. doi: 10.4081/mrm.2021.787. eCollection 2021 Jan 15.
4
The economics of precision health: preventing air pollution-induced exacerbation in asthma.精准医疗的经济学:预防空气污染诱发的哮喘加重
ERJ Open Res. 2021 Mar 22;7(1). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00790-2020. eCollection 2021 Jan.
5
Clinical and economic consequences of switching from omalizumab to mepolizumab in uncontrolled severe eosinophilic asthma.在未控制的严重嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘中,从奥马珠单抗转换为美泊利珠单抗的临床和经济后果。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 9;11(1):5453. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84895-2.
6
Aeroallergen Sensitization, Serum IgE, and Eosinophilia as Predictors of Response to Omalizumab Therapy During the Fall Season Among Children with Persistent Asthma.在秋季,气传变应原致敏、血清IgE和嗜酸性粒细胞增多作为持续性哮喘儿童奥马珠单抗治疗反应的预测指标。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Oct;8(9):3021-3028.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.03.051. Epub 2020 May 4.
7
Cost-effectiveness of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) measurement in predicting response to omalizumab in asthma.呼出一氧化氮分数(FeNO)测量在预测哮喘患者对奥马珠单抗反应中的成本效益
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2019 Apr 17;11:301-307. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S177207. eCollection 2019.
8
Using a dynamic adherence Markov model to assess the efficiency of Respiratory Medication Therapy Adherence Clinic (RMTAC) on asthma patients in Malaysia.使用动态依从性马尔可夫模型评估马来西亚呼吸药物治疗依从性诊所(RMTAC)对哮喘患者的治疗效果。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2018 Oct 19;16:36. doi: 10.1186/s12962-018-0156-1. eCollection 2018.
9
Cost Effectiveness of Pharmacological Treatments for Asthma: A Systematic Review.哮喘药物治疗的成本效益:系统评价。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Oct;36(10):1165-1200. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0668-8.
10
Cost-Effectiveness of Biological Asthma Treatments: A Systematic Review and Recommendations for Future Economic Evaluations.生物哮喘治疗的成本效益:系统评价及对未来经济评估的建议。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Aug;36(8):957-971. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0658-x.