• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

奥马珠单抗治疗荷兰未控制的过敏性哮喘的成本效益分析。

Cost-effectiveness of omalizumab for uncontrolled allergic asthma in the Netherlands.

机构信息

United BioSource Corporation, London, UK.

出版信息

J Med Econ. 2013;16(3):342-8. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2012.756398. Epub 2012 Dec 18.

DOI:10.3111/13696998.2012.756398
PMID:23216016
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Omalizumab, licensed for patients with uncontrolled persistent allergic (IgE mediated) asthma, was found to be cost-effective based upon its clinical trial data. Observational studies have been undertaken to determine the real life outcomes of using omalizumab in the community.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the cost-effectiveness of omalizumab based upon observational data from the Netherlands and compare to its cost-effectiveness using clinical trial data.

METHODS

An observational study (eXpeRience) recruited allergic asthma patients eligible for Omalizumab therapy and followed them while on treatment. At 1 year, data from the Dutch patients enrolled in eXpeRience were examined to estimate the number of exacerbations and resource use while on omalizumab therapy compared to the year prior to omalizumab use. Observational data were used in a Markov model to calculate the lifetime cost-effectiveness ratios.

RESULTS

In the 1 year prior to omalizumab therapy the per-person rate of exacerbations was 3.39 compared to 1.07 in the year taking omalizumab. The discounted incremental lifetime additional costs for omalizumab were €55,865 for 1.46 additional quality-adjusted life years (QALY), resulting in €38,371/QALY. Using the INNOVATE clinical trial outcomes and current resource use, the prior ratio was €34,911/QALY, similar to the observational ratio. As in all observational studies, the main limitation is obtaining complete and accurate data. Patients with missing exacerbation or response data were excluded from this analysis.

CONCLUSION

Non-clinical trial experience with omalizumab supported the finding of fewer exacerbations in the allergic asthma population while treated with omalizumab, and therapy was found to continue to have an attractive cost-effectiveness ratio.

摘要

背景

奥马珠单抗获批用于治疗未得到控制的持续性过敏性(IgE 介导)哮喘患者,其基于临床试验数据被证明具有成本效益。为了确定奥马珠单抗在社区中的实际应用效果,已经开展了观察性研究。

目的

根据荷兰的观察性数据确定奥马珠单抗的成本效益,并将其与临床试验数据进行比较。

方法

一项观察性研究(eXpeRience)招募了符合奥马珠单抗治疗条件的过敏性哮喘患者,并在治疗期间对他们进行随访。在第 1 年,对 eXpeRience 中纳入的荷兰患者的数据进行了评估,以估算在接受奥马珠单抗治疗期间与治疗前一年相比,发作次数和资源使用情况。观察性数据被用于马尔可夫模型来计算终生成本效益比。

结果

在接受奥马珠单抗治疗前的 1 年中,每人每年的发作率为 3.39 次,而在接受奥马珠单抗治疗的那一年为 1.07 次。奥马珠单抗的增量终生额外成本为 55865 欧元,额外获得 1.46 个质量调整生命年(QALY),即 38371 欧元/QALY。使用 INNOVATE 临床试验结果和当前资源使用情况,之前的比值为 34911 欧元/QALY,与观察性比值相似。与所有观察性研究一样,主要限制是获得完整和准确的数据。在这项分析中,对那些没有发作或反应数据的患者进行了排除。

结论

奥马珠单抗的非临床试验经验支持了在接受奥马珠单抗治疗的过敏性哮喘人群中发作次数减少的发现,并且治疗继续具有有吸引力的成本效益比。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of omalizumab for uncontrolled allergic asthma in the Netherlands.奥马珠单抗治疗荷兰未控制的过敏性哮喘的成本效益分析。
J Med Econ. 2013;16(3):342-8. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2012.756398. Epub 2012 Dec 18.
2
Omalizumab for the treatment of severe persistent allergic asthma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.奥马珠单抗治疗严重持续性过敏性哮喘:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2013 Nov;17(52):1-342. doi: 10.3310/hta17520.
3
The economic value of anti-IgE in severe persistent, IgE-mediated (allergic) asthma patients: adaptation of INNOVATE to Sweden.抗IgE在重度持续性、IgE介导的(过敏性)哮喘患者中的经济价值:将INNOVATE研究适配于瑞典
Curr Med Res Opin. 2006 Sep;22(9):1765-76. doi: 10.1185/030079906X132389.
4
Cost-effectiveness of omalizumab in severe persistent asthma in Spain: a real-life perspective.奥马珠单抗在西班牙重度持续性哮喘治疗中的成本效益:基于现实生活的视角
J Asthma. 2015 Mar;52(2):205-10. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2014.941474. Epub 2014 Nov 24.
5
Omalizumab for the treatment of severe persistent allergic asthma in children aged 6-11 years.奥马珠单抗治疗 6-11 岁儿童严重持续性过敏性哮喘。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 May;15 Suppl 1:13-21. doi: 10.3310/hta15suppl1/02.
6
A 36-month study on the cost/utility of add-on omalizumab in persistent difficult-to-treat atopic asthma in Italy.一项关于在意大利持续性难治性特应性哮喘中添加奥马珠单抗的成本/效用的36个月研究。
J Asthma. 2012 Oct;49(8):843-8. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2012.717659. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
7
Optimizing the position and use of omalizumab for severe persistent allergic asthma using cost-effectiveness analysis.使用成本效益分析优化奥马珠单抗在重度持续性过敏性哮喘中的使用位置及应用
Value Health. 2014 Dec;17(8):772-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.07.009. Epub 2014 Oct 11.
8
Omalizumab for the treatment of severe persistent allergic asthma.奥马珠单抗治疗严重持续性过敏性哮喘。
Health Technol Assess. 2009 Sep;13 Suppl 2:31-9. doi: 10.3310/hta13suppl2/05.
9
The eXpeRience registry: the 'real-world' effectiveness of omalizumab in allergic asthma.EXpeRience 登记研究:奥马珠单抗治疗过敏性哮喘的“真实世界”疗效。
Respir Med. 2013 Aug;107(8):1141-51. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2013.04.017. Epub 2013 May 28.
10
The costs and consequences of omalizumab in uncontrolled asthma from a USA payer perspective.从美国支付方角度看奥马珠单抗治疗未控制哮喘的成本与后果。
Allergy. 2010 Sep;65(9):1141-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2010.02336.x. Epub 2010 Feb 10.

引用本文的文献

1
A cost-effectiveness analysis comparing single-inhaler extrafine beclomethasone/formoterol/glycopyrronium bromide against other SITTs in adult patients with uncontrolled asthma in England.一项成本效益分析,比较单吸入器布地奈德/福莫特罗/格隆溴铵超细粉与其他长效吸入型支气管扩张剂治疗英国未控制哮喘成年患者的效果。
Health Econ Rev. 2025 May 23;15(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13561-025-00640-9.
2
Economic Impact and Clinical Outcomes of Omalizumab Add-On Therapy for Patients with Severe Persistent Asthma: A Real-World Study.奥马珠单抗附加治疗重度持续性哮喘患者的经济影响和临床结局:一项真实世界研究
Pharmacoecon Open. 2019 Sep;3(3):333-342. doi: 10.1007/s41669-019-0117-4.
3
Prospects for Monoclonal Antibody Therapy in Pediatric Asthma.
儿科哮喘中单克隆抗体治疗的前景。
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2018 Jul 10;18(9):45. doi: 10.1007/s11882-018-0799-1.
4
Cost Effectiveness of Pharmacological Treatments for Asthma: A Systematic Review.哮喘药物治疗的成本效益:系统评价。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Oct;36(10):1165-1200. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0668-8.
5
Cost-Effectiveness of Biological Asthma Treatments: A Systematic Review and Recommendations for Future Economic Evaluations.生物哮喘治疗的成本效益:系统评价及对未来经济评估的建议。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Aug;36(8):957-971. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0658-x.
6
Clinical and economic impact of a one-year treatment with omalizumab in patients with severe allergic asthma within a drug programme in Poland.波兰药物方案中奥马珠单抗治疗重度过敏性哮喘患者一年的临床和经济影响。
BMC Pulm Med. 2018 Mar 16;18(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12890-018-0610-z.
7
Cost-effectiveness of tiotropium versus omalizumab for uncontrolled allergic asthma in US.噻托溴铵与奥马珠单抗治疗美国未控制的过敏性哮喘的成本效益
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2018 Jan 30;16:3. doi: 10.1186/s12962-018-0089-8. eCollection 2018.
8
Prevalence and management of severe asthma in primary care: an observational cohort study in Sweden (PACEHR).初级保健中严重哮喘的流行情况和管理:瑞典的一项观察性队列研究(PACEHR)。
Respir Res. 2018 Jan 18;19(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12931-018-0719-x.
9
Targeting patients with asthma for omalizumab therapy: choosing the right patient to get the best value for money.针对哮喘患者进行奥马珠单抗治疗:选择合适的患者以实现最佳性价比。
Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2017 Feb;8(2-3):31-45. doi: 10.1177/2040622317690494. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
10
Cost-Utility Analysis of Long-Acting Beta Agonists versus Leukotriene Receptor Antagonists in Older Adults with Persistent Asthma Receiving Concomitant Inhaled Corticosteroid Therapy.长效β受体激动剂与白三烯受体拮抗剂用于接受吸入性糖皮质激素联合治疗的老年持续性哮喘患者的成本-效用分析
Value Health. 2016 Jul-Aug;19(5):537-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.02.004. Epub 2016 Apr 6.