Maki D G, Ringer M
University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison.
Ann Intern Med. 1991 May 15;114(10):845-54. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-114-10-845.
To identify risk factors for infusion-related phlebitis with peripheral intravenous catheters.
A randomized trial of two catheter materials, with consideration of 21 potential risk factors.
A university hospital.
Hospitalized adults without granulocytopenia who received a peripheral intravenous catheter.
House officers or ward nurses inserted the catheters, and each insertion was randomized to a catheter made of tetrafluoroethylene-hexafluoropropylene (FEP-Teflon) or a novel polyetherurethane without leachable additives (PEU-Vialon).
Research nurses scored insertion sites each day for inflammation and cultured catheters at removal.
The Kaplan-Meier risk for phlebitis exceeded 50% by day 4 after catheterization. intravenous antibiotics (relative risk, 2.00), female sex (relative risk, 1.88), prolonged (greater than 48 hours) catheterization (relative risk, 1.79), and catheter material (PEU-Vialon: FEP-Teflon) (relative risk, 0.73) strongly predicted phlebitis in a Cox proportional hazards model (each, P less than 0.003). The best-fit model for severe phlebitis identified the same predictors plus catheter-related infection (relative risk, 6.19), phlebitis with a previous catheter (relative risk, 1.54), and anatomic site (hand: forearm, relative risk, 0.71; wrist:forearm, relative risk, 0.60). The low incidence of local catheter-related infection was comparable with the two catheter materials (5.4% [95% CI, 3.8% to 7.6%] and 6.9% [CI, 4.9% to 9.6%]); none of the 1054 catheters prospectively studied caused bacteremia.
Multiple factors, including the infusate and the duration of cannulation, contribute to the development of infusion-related phlebitis. The use of peripheral intravenous catheters made of PEU-Vialon appears to pose the same risk for catheter-related infection as the use of catheters made of FEP-Teflon, and PEU-Vialon can permit longer cannulation with less risk for phlebitis. The risk for catheter-related bacteremia with FEP-Teflon and PEU-Vialon catheters is sufficiently low that it no longer seems justifiable to recommend the use of small steel needles for most peripheral intravenous therapy.
确定外周静脉导管相关输液性静脉炎的危险因素。
一项对两种导管材料进行的随机试验,同时考虑21种潜在危险因素。
一所大学医院。
接受外周静脉导管置入且无粒细胞减少症的住院成人。
住院医生或病房护士置入导管,每次置入随机分配使用由四氟乙烯-六氟丙烯(FEP-特氟龙)制成的导管或一种无可浸出添加剂的新型聚醚聚氨酯(PEU-Vialon)导管。
研究护士每天对置管部位的炎症情况进行评分,并在拔管时对导管进行培养。
导管插入后第4天,静脉炎的Kaplan-Meier风险超过50%。在Cox比例风险模型中,静脉使用抗生素(相对风险,2.00)、女性(相对风险,1.88)、长时间(超过48小时)置管(相对风险,1.79)以及导管材料(PEU-Vialon:FEP-特氟龙)(相对风险,0.73)均强烈预测静脉炎(每项,P<0.003)。重度静脉炎的最佳拟合模型确定了相同的预测因素,另外还有导管相关感染(相对风险,6.19)、既往导管引发的静脉炎(相对风险,1.54)以及解剖部位(手部:前臂,相对风险,0.71;腕部:前臂,相对风险,0.60)。两种导管材料的局部导管相关感染发生率较低(分别为5.4%[95%CI,3.8%至7.6%]和6.9%[CI,4.9%至9.6%]);前瞻性研究的1054根导管均未导致菌血症。
包括输注液和置管时间在内的多种因素导致了输液相关静脉炎的发生。使用PEU-Vialon制成的外周静脉导管似乎与使用FEP-特氟龙制成的导管具有相同的导管相关感染风险,并且PEU-Vialon可允许更长时间的置管且静脉炎风险更低。FEP-特氟龙和PEU-Vialon导管相关菌血症的风险足够低,以至于对于大多数外周静脉治疗而言,推荐使用小钢针似乎不再合理。