• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

紧急手术的持续时间和预测因素——批量伤员事件医疗管理的基础。

Duration and predictors of emergency surgical operations--basis for medical management of mass casualty incidents.

机构信息

Munich University Hospital (LMU), Department of Trauma Surgery - Campus Innenstadt, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Med Res. 2009;14(12):532-40. doi: 10.1186/2047-783x-14-12-532.

DOI:10.1186/2047-783x-14-12-532
PMID:20149987
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3351939/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hospitals have a critically important role in the management of mass causality incidents (MCI), yet there is little information to assist emergency planners. A significantly limiting factor of a hospital's capability to treat those affected is its surgical capacity. We therefore intended to provide data about the duration and predictors of life saving operations.

METHODS

The data of 20,815 predominantly blunt trauma patients recorded in the Trauma Registry of the German-Trauma-Society was retrospectively analyzed to calculate the duration of life-saving operations as well as their predictors. Inclusion criteria were an ISS≥16 and the performance of relevant ICPM-coded procedures within 6h of admission.

RESULTS

From 1,228 patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria 1,793 operations could be identified as life-saving operations. Acute injuries to the abdomen accounted for 54.1% followed by head injuries (26.3%), pelvic injuries (11.5%), thoracic injuries (5.0%) and major amputations (3.1%). The mean cut to suture time was 130min (IQR 65-165min). Logistic regression revealed 8 variables associated with an emergency operation: AIS of abdomen ≥3 (OR 4,00), ISS ≥35 (OR 2,94), hemoglobin level ≤8 mg/dL (OR 1,40), pulse rate on hospital admission <40 or >120/min (OR 1,39), blood pressure on hospital admission <90 mmHg (OR 1,35), prehospital infusion volume ≥2000 ml (OR 1,34), GCS ≤8 (OR 1,32) and anisocoria (OR 1,28) on-scene.

CONCLUSIONS

The mean operation time of 130min calculated for emergency life-saving surgical operations provides a realistic guideline for the prospective treatment capacity which can be estimated and projected into an actual incident admission capacity. Knowledge of predictive factors for life-saving emergency operations helps to identify those patients that need most urgent operative treatment in case of blunt MCI.

摘要

背景

医院在处理大规模伤亡事件(MCI)方面具有至关重要的作用,但目前几乎没有信息可以帮助应急规划人员。医院治疗伤员的能力的一个显著限制因素是其外科手术能力。因此,我们旨在提供有关救命手术持续时间和预测因素的数据。

方法

回顾性分析德国创伤学会创伤登记处记录的 20815 名主要为钝器创伤患者的数据,以计算救命手术的持续时间及其预测因素。纳入标准为 ISS≥16 分,以及入院后 6 小时内进行相关 ICPM 编码手术。

结果

从符合纳入标准的 1228 名患者中,共确定了 1793 次可作为救命手术的手术。腹部急性损伤占 54.1%,其次是头部损伤(26.3%)、骨盆损伤(11.5%)、胸部损伤(5.0%)和主要截肢(3.1%)。从切开至缝合的平均时间为 130 分钟(IQR 65-165 分钟)。Logistic 回归分析显示,有 8 个变量与急诊手术相关:腹部 AIS≥3(OR 4.00)、ISS≥35(OR 2.94)、血红蛋白水平≤8mg/dL(OR 1.40)、入院时脉搏率<40 或>120/min(OR 1.39)、入院时血压<90mmHg(OR 1.35)、院前输液量≥2000ml(OR 1.34)、GCS≤8(OR 1.32)和现场瞳孔不等大(OR 1.28)。

结论

对于紧急救命手术,计算出的 130 分钟的平均手术时间为前瞻性治疗能力提供了一个现实的指导,可对其进行估计并预测到实际事件入院能力。了解救命急诊手术的预测因素有助于识别在钝器性 MCI 中最需要紧急手术治疗的患者。

相似文献

1
Duration and predictors of emergency surgical operations--basis for medical management of mass casualty incidents.紧急手术的持续时间和预测因素——批量伤员事件医疗管理的基础。
Eur J Med Res. 2009;14(12):532-40. doi: 10.1186/2047-783x-14-12-532.
2
[Estimation of surgical treatment capacity for managing mass casualty incidents based on time needed for life-saving emergency operations].基于挽救生命的急诊手术所需时间对大规模伤亡事件手术治疗能力的评估
Unfallchirurg. 2006 Apr;109(4):278-84. doi: 10.1007/s00113-006-1061-1.
3
Prehospital triage for mass casualty incidents using the META method for early surgical assessment: retrospective validation of a hospital trauma registry.运用 META 方法对大量伤员事件进行院前分诊用于早期外科评估:医院创伤登记处的回顾性验证。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020 Apr;46(2):425-433. doi: 10.1007/s00068-018-1040-6. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
4
A systematic literature review of criteria and models for casualty distribution in trauma related mass casualty incidents.对创伤相关大规模伤亡事件中伤员分配标准和模型的系统文献综述。
Injury. 2018 Nov;49(11):1959-1968. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.09.005. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
5
Patient distribution in a mass casualty event of an airplane crash.在空难大规模伤亡事件中的患者分布情况。
Injury. 2013 Nov;44(11):1574-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.04.027. Epub 2013 May 28.
6
Emergency radiology and mass casualty incidents-report of a mass casualty incident at a level 1 trauma center.急诊放射学与大规模伤亡事件——一级创伤中心大规模伤亡事件报告
Emerg Radiol. 2017 Feb;24(1):47-53. doi: 10.1007/s10140-016-1441-y. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
7
Reconsidering the Resources Needed for Multiple Casualty Events: Lessons Learned From the Crash of Asiana Airlines Flight 214.重新考虑应对多伤员事件所需的资源:从韩亚航空公司 214 航班坠机事故中吸取的教训。
JAMA Surg. 2016 Jun 1;151(6):512-7. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.5107.
8
Specificities of terrorist attacks: organisation of the in-hospital patient-flow and treatment strategies.恐怖袭击的特点:医院内患者流程的组织和治疗策略。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020 Aug;46(4):673-682. doi: 10.1007/s00068-020-01390-5. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
9
Injury patterns of mass casualty incidents involving high-speed passenger ferries presenting to accident and emergency departments in Hong Kong: a retrospective review.涉及高速客船的重大伤亡事故在香港急诊部门的损伤模式:回顾性研究。
Injury. 2020 Feb;51(2):252-259. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.12.001. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
10
Major incident triage: Derivation and comparative analysis of the Modified Physiological Triage Tool (MPTT).重大事件分诊:改良生理分诊工具(MPTT)的推导与比较分析
Injury. 2017 May;48(5):992-999. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.01.038. Epub 2017 Jan 23.

引用本文的文献

1
[Pretreatment mass casualty incident workflow analysis : Comparison of two level 1 trauma centers].[院前批量伤亡事件工作流程分析:两家一级创伤中心的比较]
Unfallchirurg. 2016 Aug;119(8):632-41. doi: 10.1007/s00113-016-0200-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Injury patterns from major urban terrorist bombings in trains: the Madrid experience.马德里火车重大城市恐怖爆炸事件的损伤模式:马德里的经验。
World J Surg. 2008 Jun;32(6):1168-75. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9557-1.
2
Accuracy of physical and ultrasonographic examinations by emergency physicians for the early diagnosis of intraabdominal haemorrhage in blunt abdominal trauma.急诊医生进行体格检查和超声检查对钝性腹部创伤中腹腔内出血早期诊断的准确性。
Injury. 2007 May;38(5):564-9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2007.01.010.
3
Prehospital hypotension is a predictor of the need for an emergent, therapeutic operation in trauma patients with normal systolic blood pressure in the emergency department.院前低血压是急诊科收缩压正常的创伤患者需要进行急诊治疗性手术的一个预测指标。
J Trauma. 2006 Nov;61(5):1228-33. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000196694.52615.84.
4
Development of an accelerated MSCT protocol (Triage MSCT) for mass casualty incidents: comparison to MSCT for single-trauma patients.用于大规模伤亡事件的加速多层螺旋CT方案(分流多层螺旋CT)的开发:与用于单创伤患者的多层螺旋CT的比较。
Emerg Radiol. 2006 Jul;12(5):203-9. doi: 10.1007/s10140-006-0485-9. Epub 2006 May 30.
5
Suicide bombing attacks: Can external signs predict internal injuries?自杀式爆炸袭击:外部迹象能否预测内部损伤?
Ann Surg. 2006 Apr;243(4):541-6. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000206418.53137.34.
6
Surgical lessons learned from suicide bombing attacks.从自杀式炸弹袭击中吸取的外科手术经验教训。
J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Feb;202(2):313-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.10.011. Epub 2005 Dec 27.
7
Prehospital ultrasound imaging improves management of abdominal trauma.院前超声成像改善腹部创伤的管理。
Br J Surg. 2006 Feb;93(2):238-42. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5213.
8
London bombings July 2005: the immediate pre-hospital medical response.2005年7月伦敦爆炸案:院前急救的即时响应。
Resuscitation. 2005 Aug;66(2):ix-xii. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.07.005.
9
Can external signs of trauma guide management?: Lessons learned from suicide bombing attacks in Israel.创伤的外部迹象能指导治疗吗?从以色列自杀式爆炸袭击中吸取的教训。
Arch Surg. 2005 Apr;140(4):390-3. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.140.4.390.
10
How does casualty load affect trauma care in urban bombing incidents? A quantitative analysis.伤亡人数如何影响城市爆炸事件中的创伤护理?一项定量分析。
J Trauma. 2005 Apr;58(4):686-93; discussion 694-5. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000159243.70507.86.