Sakamoto Takashi, Iwamura Hitoshi, Kashio Akinori, Ito Ken, Kaga Kimitaka, Suzuki Mitsuya, Yamasoba Tatsuya
Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. tsakamoto-tky @ umin.ac.jp
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2010;72(1):16-21. doi: 10.1159/000267136. Epub 2010 Feb 11.
The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the differences in hearing results and complications between the conventional technique (CT) and potassium titanyl phosphate laser (KTP) laser-assisted stapes surgery that does not involve the manipulation of the foot plate.
Ninety-eight ears with conductive or mixed hearing loss due to otosclerosis were operated on by using the CT or KTP laser-assisted manipulation. The results of pure-tone audiometry, the duration of postoperative vestibular symptoms, and the presence of damage to the foot plate were reviewed retrospectively.
The extent of hearing improvement and the duration of vestibular symptoms were not significantly different between the two groups. The damage to the foot plate was significantly less frequent in the KTP group compared to the CT group. Profound sensorineural hearing loss occurred in one case in the CT group, whereas no significant sensorineural hearing loss was detected in the KTP group.
According to our present findings, KTP laser-assisted surgery was safer than CT in terms of the damage to the foot plate even when the KTP laser was not used for opening the foot plate. However, both techniques showed similar results in hearing improvement and vestibular symptoms.
本研究旨在评估传统技术(CT)与不涉及镫骨底板操作的磷酸钛氧钾(KTP)激光辅助镫骨手术在听力结果和并发症方面的差异。
对98例因耳硬化症导致传导性或混合性听力损失的耳朵采用CT或KTP激光辅助操作进行手术。回顾性分析纯音听力测定结果、术后前庭症状持续时间以及镫骨底板损伤情况。
两组之间听力改善程度和前庭症状持续时间无显著差异。与CT组相比,KTP组镫骨底板损伤的发生率显著更低。CT组有1例发生重度感音神经性听力损失,而KTP组未检测到明显的感音神经性听力损失。
根据我们目前的研究结果,即使KTP激光未用于打开镫骨底板,KTP激光辅助手术在镫骨底板损伤方面比CT手术更安全。然而,两种技术在听力改善和前庭症状方面显示出相似的结果。