Department of Clinical and Molecular Endocrinology and Oncology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Thyroid. 2010 Feb;20(2):135-46. doi: 10.1089/thy.2009.0311.
Despite clinical practice guidelines for the management of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC), there are no recommendations on the optimal serum thyrotropin (TSH) concentration to reduce tumor recurrences and improve survival, while ensuring an optimal quality of life with minimal adverse effects. The aim of this review was to provide a risk-adapted management scheme for levothyroxine (L-T4) therapy in patients with DTC. The objective was to establish which patients require complete suppression of serum TSH levels, given their risk of recurrent or metastatic DTC, and how potential adverse effects on the heart and skeleton, induced by subclinical hyperthyroidism, in concert with advanced age and comorbidities, may influence the degree of TSH suppression.
A risk-stratified approach to predict the rate of recurrence and death from thyroid cancer was based on the recently revised American Thyroid Association guidelines. A stratified approach to predict the risk from the adverse effects of L-T4 was devised, taking into account the age of the patient, as well as the presence of preexisting cardiovascular and skeletal risk factors that might predispose to the development of long-term adverse cardiovascular or skeletal outcomes, particularly increased heart rate and left ventricular mass, atrial fibrillation, and osteoporosis. Nine potential patient categories can be defined, with differing TSH targets for both initial and long-term L-T4 therapy.
Before deciding on the degree of TSH suppression during initial and long-term L-T4 treatment in patients with DTC, it is necessary to consider the aggressiveness of DTC, as well as the potential for adverse effects induced by iatrogenic subclinical hyperthyroidism. More aggressive TSH suppression is indicated in patients with high-risk disease or recurrent tumor, whereas less aggressive TSH suppression is reasonable in low-risk patients. In patients with high-risk DTC and an equally high risk of adverse effects, long-term treatment with L-T4 therapy should be individualized and balanced against the potential for adverse effects. In patients with an intermediate risk for thyroid cancer recurrence and a high risk of adverse effects of therapy, the degree of TSH suppression should be reevaluated during the follow-up period. Normalization of serum TSH is advisable for long-term treatment of disease-free elderly patients with DTC and significant comorbidities.
尽管有分化型甲状腺癌(DTC)管理的临床实践指南,但对于降低肿瘤复发率和提高生存率,同时确保最佳生活质量和最小不良反应的最佳促甲状腺激素(TSH)浓度,尚无推荐意见。本综述的目的是为 DTC 患者的左旋甲状腺素(L-T4)治疗提供一种风险适应管理方案。目的是确定哪些患者需要完全抑制血清 TSH 水平,因为他们有 DTC 复发或转移的风险,以及亚临床甲状腺功能亢进症引起的潜在心脏和骨骼不良影响,以及高龄和合并症,可能会影响 TSH 抑制的程度。
基于最近修订的美国甲状腺协会指南,提出了一种风险分层方法来预测甲状腺癌的复发和死亡率。设计了一种分层方法来预测 L-T4 不良影响的风险,同时考虑了患者的年龄,以及是否存在可能导致长期不良心血管或骨骼结局的预先存在的心血管和骨骼危险因素,特别是心率加快和左心室质量增加、心房颤动和骨质疏松症。可以定义九个潜在的患者类别,对于初始和长期 L-T4 治疗,有不同的 TSH 目标。
在决定 DTC 患者初始和长期 L-T4 治疗的 TSH 抑制程度之前,有必要考虑 DTC 的侵袭性,以及由医源性亚临床甲状腺功能亢进引起的不良反应的可能性。高危疾病或复发性肿瘤患者需要更积极的 TSH 抑制,而低危患者则需要较不积极的 TSH 抑制。对于高危 DTC 且同样有治疗不良反应高风险的患者,长期 L-T4 治疗应个体化,并与不良反应的可能性相平衡。对于甲状腺癌复发风险中等且治疗不良反应风险高的患者,应在随访期间重新评估 TSH 抑制程度。对于无疾病的老年 DTC 患者和有显著合并症的患者,长期治疗使血清 TSH 正常化是可取的。