East Jeffrey M, Mitchell Derek I G
Department of Surgery, Cornwall Regional Hospital, Montego Bay, Jamaica.
BMC Surg. 2010 Feb 12;10:6. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-10-6.
During a previous study to define and compare incidence risks of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) for elective laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy at two hospitals in Jamaica, secondary analysis comparing PONV risk in elective open cholecystectomy to that after emergency open cholecystectomy suggested that it was markedly reduced in the latter group. The decision was made to collect data on an adequate sample of emergency open cholecystectomy cases and further explore this unexpected finding in a separate study.
Data were collected for 91 emergency open cholecystomy cases identified at the two participating hospitals from May 2007 retrograde, as was done for the 175 elective open cholecystectomy cases (from the aforementioned study) with which the emergency cases were to be compared. Variables selected for extraction and statistical analysis included all those known, suspected and plausibly associated with the risk of PONV and with urgency of surgery.
Emergency open cholecystectomy was associated with a markedly reduced incidence risk of PONV compared to elective open cholecystectomy (6.6% versus 28.6%, P < 0.001). The suppressive effect of emergency increased after adjustment for confounders in a multivariable logistic regression model (odds ratio 0.103, P < 0.001). This finding also identifies, by extrapolation, an association between reduced risk of PONV and preoperative nausea and vomiting, which occurred in 80.2% of emergency cases in the 72 hour period preceding surgery.
The incidence risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting is markedly decreased after emergency open cholecystectomy compared to elective open cholecystectomy. The study, by extrapolation, also identifies a paradoxical association between pre-operative nausea and vomiting, observed in 80.2% of emergency cases, and suppression of PONV. This association, if confirmed in prospective cohort studies, may have implications for PONV prophylaxis if it can be exploited at a sub-clinical level.
在之前一项旨在确定并比较牙买加两家医院择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术和开腹胆囊切除术术后恶心呕吐(PONV)发生率风险的研究中,将择期开腹胆囊切除术的PONV风险与急诊开腹胆囊切除术后的风险进行的二次分析表明,后一组的风险显著降低。因此决定收集足够数量的急诊开腹胆囊切除术病例的数据,并在另一项研究中进一步探究这一意外发现。
从2007年5月起追溯性收集两家参与研究医院中确定的91例急诊开腹胆囊切除术病例的数据,就如同对175例择期开腹胆囊切除术病例(来自上述研究)所做的那样,急诊病例将与这些择期病例进行比较。选择提取和统计分析的变量包括所有已知、疑似且可能与PONV风险及手术紧迫性相关的变量。
与择期开腹胆囊切除术相比,急诊开腹胆囊切除术的PONV发生率风险显著降低(6.6%对28.6%,P<0.001)。在多变量逻辑回归模型中对混杂因素进行调整后,急诊的抑制作用增强(比值比0.103,P<0.001)。通过外推,这一发现还确定了PONV风险降低与术前恶心呕吐之间的关联,术前恶心呕吐发生在手术前72小时内80.2%的急诊病例中。
与择期开腹胆囊切除术相比,急诊开腹胆囊切除术后恶心呕吐的发生率风险显著降低。该研究通过外推还确定了术前恶心呕吐(在80.2%的急诊病例中观察到)与PONV抑制之间的矛盾关联。如果在前瞻性队列研究中得到证实,这种关联若能在亚临床水平加以利用,可能对PONV预防具有重要意义。