National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Feb;137(2):218-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.02.029.
The purpose of this pilot study was to use cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) to determine the volumes of the maxilla and the mandible in subjects with skeletal Class I, Class II, and Class III malocclusions. Hypothesis 1 was that the volume (size) of a skeletal Class II maxilla is larger than those of Class I and Class III. Hypothesis 2 was that the volume of a skeletal Class III mandible is larger than those of Class I and Class II.
Thirty women patients were classified into 3 groups according to their skeletal pattern: skeletal Class I (0 degrees < or =ANB <6 degrees ), Class II (ANB > or =6 degrees ) and Class III (ANB <0 degrees ). The volumes of the maxilla and the mandible were measured with CBCT. CB MercuRay (Hitachi Medico, Tokyo, Japan) and CB works software (CyberMed, Seoul, Korea) were used to process the images.
There was a trend that skeletal Class III subjects might have significantly greater mandibular volume compared with Class II subjects (P = 0.089). The ratios of maxilla-to-mandible volumes between the skeletal Class II and Class III groups were significantly different (P = 0.005). Differences were observed in the ratios of maxillary and mandibular volumes across the 3 groups.
Hypotheses 1 and 2 were rejected; there was no trend for Class III subjects to have larger mandibles (P = 0.089) compared with Class II subjects. The ratio of the maxilla and mandible volumes in skeletal Class III subjects was significantly larger (P = 0.005) compared with Class II subjects.
本研究旨在使用锥形束 CT(CBCT)确定骨性 I 类、II 类和 III 类错牙合患者上颌骨和下颌骨的体积。假设 1:骨性 II 类上颌骨的体积(大小)大于 I 类和 III 类。假设 2:骨性 III 类下颌骨的体积大于 I 类和 II 类。
根据骨骼模式将 30 名女性患者分为 3 组:骨性 I 类(0 度≤ ANB<6 度)、II 类(ANB≥6 度)和 III 类(ANB<0 度)。使用 CBCT 测量上颌骨和下颌骨的体积。使用 CB MercuRay(Hitachi Medico,东京,日本)和 CB works 软件(CyberMed,首尔,韩国)处理图像。
骨性 III 类患者的下颌骨体积可能明显大于 II 类患者(P=0.089),这是一种趋势。骨性 II 类和 III 类组的上颌骨与下颌骨体积比有显著差异(P=0.005)。3 组之间观察到上颌骨和下颌骨体积比的差异。
假设 1 和 2 被否定;与 II 类患者相比,III 类患者的下颌骨没有更大的趋势(P=0.089)。骨性 III 类患者的上颌骨与下颌骨体积比显著大于 II 类患者(P=0.005)。