Zago Humberto, Navarro Ricardo-de Lima, Laranjeira Vinicius, Fernandes Thais-Maria-Freire, Conti Ana-Cláudia-de Castro-Ferreira, Oltramari Paula-Vanessa-Pedron
DDS, MSc. Former Graduate Student, Department of Orthodontics, UNOPAR - University of North Paraná, Brazil.
DDS, MSc, PhD. Private practice, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil.
J Clin Exp Dent. 2021 Nov 1;13(11):e1131-e1139. doi: 10.4317/jced.57574. eCollection 2021 Nov.
The selection of temporary anchorage device (TAD) site can be a challenging task since one should not only consider the 2-D distances between roots, but also the entire 3-D space. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the posterior maxillary region areas available for the insertion of temporary anchorage devices in reconstructed images from cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).
Sample consisted of 72 patients with indication for orthodontic treatment, grouped into three distinct age groups: 11 to 14 years (age group 1), 15 to 19 years (age group 2) and aged 20 years or older (age group 3), which were further subdivided as to the type of malocclusion (Angle Class I, II and III). Orthopantomographic reconstructions and cross sections were obtained with the Dolphin Imaging software. The distance between the roots of maxillary teeth (canines, premolars and first molars) was determined at 5 mm of the cementoenamel junction, as well as the depth of bone availability at different insertion angles (90°, 75°, 60°, 45°). The influence of different angulations, age, and malocclusion on bone availability was evaluated by ANOVA, followed by the Bonferroni post-test. For the evaluation of the interaction of these factors, 2-way ANOVA was used.
Bone availability was found to be poor between roots in the molar region. There was a reduction in bone availability with increasing age. With regard to angulations, greater bone availability was found in depth for 45° angulation in the canine and first premolar regions and for angulation of 75° or 90° in the molar region. However, there was no difference between bone availability in the region of the second premolars.
According to applied methodology it can be concluded that the region between canines and premolars accepts better vertical angular variations for TADs insertion. Cone-Beam Computed Tomography, Orthodontic Anchorage Procedures.
临时锚固装置(TAD)植入部位的选择可能具有挑战性,因为不仅要考虑牙根之间的二维距离,还要考虑整个三维空间。因此,本研究的目的是在锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)重建图像中评估上颌后部区域可用于插入临时锚固装置的区域。
样本包括72例有正畸治疗指征的患者,分为三个不同年龄组:11至14岁(年龄组1)、15至19岁(年龄组2)和20岁及以上(年龄组3),并根据错牙合类型(安氏I类、II类和III类)进一步细分。使用Dolphin Imaging软件获得全景重建图像和横断面图像。在上颌牙齿(尖牙、前磨牙和第一磨牙)牙骨质釉质界5mm处确定牙根之间的距离,以及不同植入角度(90°、75°、60°、45°)下的骨可用深度。通过方差分析(ANOVA)评估不同角度、年龄和错牙合对骨可用性的影响,随后进行Bonferroni事后检验。为了评估这些因素的相互作用,使用双向方差分析。
发现磨牙区域牙根之间的骨可用性较差。随着年龄的增加,骨可用性降低。关于角度,在尖牙和第一前磨牙区域,45°角度的深度骨可用性更高;在磨牙区域,75°或90°角度的骨可用性更高。然而,第二前磨牙区域的骨可用性之间没有差异。
根据所应用的方法可以得出结论,尖牙和前磨牙之间的区域更能接受临时锚固装置植入时更好的垂直角度变化。锥形束计算机断层扫描,正畸锚固程序。