Zirnsak Marc, Lappe Markus, Hamker Fred H
Department of Psychology, Institute II, Westf. Wilhelms-University, Münster, Germany.
Vision Res. 2010 Jun 25;50(14):1328-37. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.02.002. Epub 2010 Feb 10.
At the time of an impending saccade receptive fields (RFs) undergo dynamic changes, that is, their spatial profile is altered. This phenomenon has been observed in several monkey visual areas. Although their link to eye movements is obvious, neither the exact pattern nor their function is fully clear. Several RF shifts have been interpreted in terms of predictive remapping mediating visual stability. In particular, even prior to saccade onset some cells become responsive to stimuli presented in their future, post-saccadic RF. In visual area V4, however, the overall effect of RF dynamics consists of a shrinkage and shift of RFs towards the saccade target. These observations have been linked to a pre-saccadically enhanced processing of the future fixation. In order to better understand these seemingly different outcomes, we analyzed the RF shifts predicted by a recently proposed computational model of peri-saccadic perception (Hamker, Zirnsak, Calow, & Lappe, 2008). This model unifies peri-saccadic compression, pre-saccadic attention shifts, and peri-saccadic receptive field dynamics in a common framework of oculomotor reentry signals in extrastriate visual cortical maps. According to the simulations that we present in the current paper, a spatially selective oculomotor feedback signal leads to RF dynamics which are both consistent with the observations made in studies aiming to investigate predictive remapping and saccade target shifts. Thus, the seemingly distinct experimental observations could be grounded in the same neural mechanism leading to different RF dynamics dependent on the location of the RF in visual space.
在即将发生扫视时,感受野(RFs)会经历动态变化,即其空间分布会改变。这种现象已在猴子的多个视觉区域中被观察到。尽管它们与眼动的联系很明显,但确切模式及其功能都尚未完全明确。几种感受野的变化已根据介导视觉稳定性的预测性重映射来解释。特别是,甚至在扫视开始之前,一些细胞就会对其未来扫视后感受野中呈现的刺激产生反应。然而,在视觉区域V4中,感受野动态变化的总体效果是感受野向扫视目标收缩并发生偏移。这些观察结果与扫视前对未来注视的增强处理有关。为了更好地理解这些看似不同的结果,我们分析了最近提出的扫视周围感知计算模型(Hamker、Zirnsak、Calow和Lappe,2008年)所预测的感受野变化。该模型在纹外视觉皮层地图中的眼动再入信号的共同框架内,统一了扫视周围压缩、扫视前注意力转移和扫视周围感受野动态变化。根据我们在本文中给出的模拟结果,一种空间选择性的眼动反馈信号会导致感受野动态变化,这与旨在研究预测性重映射和扫视目标偏移的研究中所做的观察结果一致。因此,这些看似不同的实验观察结果可能基于相同的神经机制,导致感受野动态变化因视觉空间中感受野的位置而异。