Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, 28034 Madrid, Spain.
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2009 Dec;21(6):376-85. doi: 10.1007/BF03327452.
BACKGROUND. In September 2008, under the French Presidency of the European Union and with the support of the Polish Minister of Health, a European Summit on Age-Related Disease was organised inWroclaw (Poland). At this meeting, European politicians, gerontologists and geriatricians gathered to discuss a common approach to future challenges related to age-related disease. Politicians and decision-makers from the European Union and Ministers of Health and their deputies from many European countries raised the problems and difficulties to be tackled in a growing population with a high burden of disease, and asked scientists to write a consensus document with recommendations for future actions and decisions. Scientists and clinicians worked in parallel in three different groups, on health promotion and preventive actions, basic research in age-related disease, and clinical aspects of disease in older people. Beforehand, the format of the paper with recommendations was discussed, and it was finally agreed that, for a better understanding by decision- makers, it would be divided in two different columns: one with facts that were considered settled and agreed by most experts (under the heading We know), and a second with recommendations related to each fact (We recommend). No limit on the number of topics to be discussed was settled. After careful and detailed discussion in each group, which in most cases included the exact wording of each statement, chairpersons presented the results in a plenary session, and new input from all participants was received, until each of the statements and recommendations were accepted by a large majority. Areas with no consensus were excluded from the document. Immediately after the Summit, the chairpersons sent the document both to the main authors and to a list of experts (see footnote) who had made presentations at the summit and agreed to review and critically comment on the final document, which is presented below. As regards the scientific aspects of the planning of the Summit, several organisations, under the leadership of the EUGMS, were asked both to review the program and to suggest names of speakers and participants. After the Summit, the Boards of these organizations (European Union Geriatric Medicine Society (EUGMS), International Association of Gerontology and Geriatrics-European Region (IAGGER), European Association of Geriatric Psychiatry (EAGP), International Society of Gerontechnology (ISG) and International Society for the Study of the Aging Male (ISSAM) agreed to consider the document as an official paper, and help with its dissemination. The name Silver Paper was used, recalling the grey or silvery hair of our older citizens, as an easy reference. It has been sent officially to several bodies of the European Union and to Health Ministers of most European countries; and will be published in other languages in local journals. Its declared intention is to foster changes in policies which may, in the future, reduce the burden of disease in old age.
2008 年 9 月,在法国担任欧盟轮值主席国期间,并在波兰卫生部长的支持下,在弗罗茨瓦夫(波兰)举办了一次与老龄相关疾病的欧洲峰会。在这次会议上,欧洲政治家、老年学家和老年医学家聚集在一起,讨论与老龄相关疾病的未来挑战的共同方法。来自欧盟的政治家和决策者以及许多欧洲国家的卫生部长及其代表提出了在人口老龄化和疾病负担沉重的情况下需要解决的问题和困难,并要求科学家们撰写一份共识文件,提出未来行动和决策的建议。科学家和临床医生在三个不同的小组中平行工作,分别是健康促进和预防措施、老龄疾病的基础研究以及老年人的临床疾病方面。在此之前,讨论了建议书的格式,最终商定,为了使决策者更好地理解,将其分为两列:一栏是大多数专家认为既定和同意的事实(标题为“我们知道”),另一栏是与每个事实相关的建议(标题为“我们建议”)。没有规定要讨论的主题数量。在每个小组进行了仔细和详细的讨论之后,在大多数情况下包括了每个陈述的确切措辞,主席们在全体会议上介绍了结果,并收到了所有与会者的新投入,直到每个陈述和建议都得到了大多数人的认可。没有共识的领域被排除在文件之外。峰会结束后,主席们将文件同时发送给主要作者和一份专家名单(见脚注),这些专家在峰会上作了介绍,并同意审查和批判性地评论最终文件,以下是这份文件。关于峰会规划的科学方面,在 EUGMS 的领导下,邀请了几个组织审查计划并提出演讲者和参与者的姓名。峰会结束后,这些组织的董事会(欧洲老年医学学会(EUGMS)、国际老年学和老年医学协会-欧洲地区(IAGGER)、欧洲老年精神病学协会(EAGP)、国际老年技术学会(ISG)和国际男性衰老研究协会(ISSAM)同意将该文件视为正式文件,并帮助传播。该文件使用了“银皮书”这个名字,让人联想到我们年长公民的灰色或银色头发,作为一个简单的参考。它已正式发送给欧盟的几个机构和大多数欧洲国家的卫生部长;并将以其他语言在当地期刊上发表。它的目的是促进政策的改变,这些改变可能会在未来减轻老年人的疾病负担。