Department of Emergency, Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, AL Khodh, Muscat, Oman.
Eur J Emerg Med. 2010 Oct;17(5):280-2. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e32833483ed.
Cranial computed tomography (CT) of the head is widely used in the emergency department 24 h a day. We compared the accuracy of CT head interpretation between staff emergency physicians (EPs) and neuroradiologists. We conducted a health records review of patients who required head CT in the emergency department. Two independent reviewers rated disagreement as clinically normal, significant, or clinically insignificant findings using published definition criteria. We calculated concordance and prepared descriptive and kappa statistics with 95% confidence intervals using SAS 9.1 software. We included 442 for this study. CT heads were classified as: normal or nonacute 81.5% (360 cases), insignificant 3.8% (17 cases), and significant 14.7% (65 cases). The weighted kappa for agreement was 0.83 (95% confidence interval 0.76-0.90). None of these patients had adverse outcomes related to EP misinterpretation of the CT head. In conclusion, clinically important findings on CT head are not commonly missed by our EPs and patients rarely have inappropriate disposition.
头部计算机断层扫描(CT)在急诊科 24 小时广泛应用。我们比较了急诊医生(EP)和神经放射科医生对 CT 头部解读的准确性。我们对急诊科需要头部 CT 的患者进行了病历回顾。两位独立的评审员使用已发表的定义标准,将不一致的结果评为临床正常、显著或临床无意义的发现。我们使用 SAS 9.1 软件计算了一致性,并准备了描述性和kappa 统计数据及其 95%置信区间。我们纳入了 442 例患者进行研究。将头部 CT 分为:正常或非急性 81.5%(360 例)、无显著意义 3.8%(17 例)和显著 14.7%(65 例)。一致的加权 Kappa 值为 0.83(95%置信区间 0.76-0.90)。这些患者中均无因 EP 对 CT 头部解读错误而导致不良结局的情况。总之,我们的 EP 医生通常不会遗漏 CT 头部的重要临床发现,且患者的处理很少不恰当。