Parag Priyashini, Hardcastle Timothy Craig
Department of Radiology, Nelson R Mandela School of Clinical Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Department of Radiology, Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital, Durban, South Africa.
Afr J Emerg Med. 2020 Jun;10(2):90-94. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2020.01.008. Epub 2020 Mar 7.
Time is critical in the trauma setting. Emergency computed tomography (CT) scans are usually interpreted by the attending doctor and plans to manage the patient are implemented before the formal radiological report is available. This study aims to investigate the discrepancy in interpretation of emergency whole body CT scans in trauma patients by the trauma surgeon and radiologist and to determine if the difference in trauma surgeon and radiologist interpretation of emergency trauma CT scans has an impact on patient management.
This prospective observational comparative study was conducted over a 6 month period (01 April-30 September 2016) at the Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital which has a level 1 trauma department. The study population comprised 62 polytrauma patients who underwent a multiphase whole body CT scans as per the trauma imaging protocol. The trauma surgeons' initial interpretation of the CT scan and radiological report were compared. All CT scans reported by the radiology registrar were reviewed by a consultant radiologist. The time from completion of the CT scan and completion of the radiological report was analysed.
Since the trauma surgeon accompanied the patient to radiology and reviewed the images as soon as the scan was complete, the initial interpretation of the CT was performed within 15-30 min. The median time between the CT scan completion and reporting turnaround time was 75 (16-218) min. Critical findings were missed by the trauma surgeon in 4.8% of patients (bronchial transection, abdominal aortic intimal tear and cervical spine fracture) and non-critical/incidental findings in 41.94%. The trauma surgeon correctly detected and graded visceral injury in all cases.
There was no significant discrepancy in the critical findings on interpretation of whole body CT scans in polytrauma patients by the trauma surgeon and radiologist and therefore no negative impact on patient management from missed injury or misdiagnosis.The turnaround time for the radiology report does not allow for timeous management of the trauma patient.
在创伤救治环境中,时间至关重要。急诊计算机断层扫描(CT)通常由主治医生解读,在正式的放射学报告出来之前就会实施患者的管理计划。本研究旨在调查创伤外科医生和放射科医生对创伤患者急诊全身CT扫描解读的差异,并确定创伤外科医生和放射科医生对急诊创伤CT扫描解读的差异是否会对患者管理产生影响。
这项前瞻性观察性比较研究在因科西·阿尔伯特·卢图利中心医院进行,为期6个月(2016年4月1日至9月30日),该医院设有一级创伤科室。研究人群包括62例多发伤患者,他们按照创伤成像方案接受了多期全身CT扫描。比较了创伤外科医生对CT扫描的初始解读和放射学报告。放射科住院医师报告的所有CT扫描均由放射科顾问医生复查。分析了从CT扫描完成到放射学报告完成的时间。
由于创伤外科医生陪同患者前往放射科,并在扫描完成后立即查看图像,因此CT的初始解读在15至30分钟内完成。CT扫描完成与报告周转时间之间的中位时间为75(16 - 218)分钟。创伤外科医生在4.8%的患者中漏诊了关键发现(支气管横断、腹主动脉内膜撕裂和颈椎骨折),在41.94%的患者中漏诊了非关键/偶然发现。创伤外科医生在所有病例中均正确检测并分级了内脏损伤。
创伤外科医生和放射科医生对多发伤患者全身CT扫描解读的关键发现没有显著差异,因此漏诊损伤或误诊对患者管理没有负面影响。放射学报告的周转时间不允许对创伤患者进行及时管理。