Centre for Behaviour and Evolution and Institute of Neuroscience, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Mar 27;365(1542):883-900. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0211.
Understanding the survival value of behaviour does not tell us how the mechanisms that control this behaviour work. Nevertheless, understanding survival value can guide the study of these mechanisms. In this paper, we apply this principle to understanding the cognitive mechanisms that support cache retrieval in scatter-hoarding animals. We believe it is too simplistic to predict that all scatter-hoarding animals will outperform non-hoarding animals on all tests of spatial memory. Instead, we argue that we should look at the detailed ecology and natural history of each species. This understanding of natural history then allows us to make predictions about which aspects of spatial memory should be better in which species. We use the natural hoarding behaviour of the three best-studied groups of scatter-hoarding animals to make predictions about three aspects of their spatial memory: duration, capacity and spatial resolution, and we test these predictions against the existing literature. Having laid out how ecology and natural history can be used to predict detailed cognitive abilities, we then suggest using this approach to guide the study of the neural basis of these abilities. We believe that this complementary approach will reveal aspects of memory processing that would otherwise be difficult to discover.
理解行为的生存价值并不能告诉我们控制这种行为的机制是如何工作的。然而,理解生存价值可以指导这些机制的研究。在本文中,我们将这一原则应用于理解支持散布贮藏动物贮藏检索的认知机制。我们认为,预测所有散布贮藏动物在所有空间记忆测试中都优于非贮藏动物的说法过于简单。相反,我们认为我们应该研究每个物种的详细生态学和自然历史。对自然历史的这种理解使我们能够预测在哪些方面空间记忆在哪些物种中会更好。我们使用三种研究最充分的散布贮藏动物群体的自然贮藏行为来预测它们空间记忆的三个方面:持续时间、容量和空间分辨率,并根据现有文献对这些预测进行测试。在阐述了生态学和自然历史如何用于预测详细的认知能力之后,我们建议使用这种方法来指导这些能力的神经基础研究。我们相信,这种互补的方法将揭示出否则难以发现的记忆处理方面。