Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Gartnavel Royal Hospital, 1055 Great Western Road, Glasgow, UK.
Clin Rehabil. 2010 Mar;24(3):195-201. doi: 10.1177/0269215509353270. Epub 2010 Feb 15.
Errorless learning is an effective strategy for the cognitive rehabilitation of memory impairment, but there is little evidence to support its use for skill learning. This preliminary study investigates whether errorless learning is superior to treatment as usual (trial and error), when teaching people with amputations and comorbid risk of vascular cognitive impairment to fit a prosthetic limb.
A randomized control design.
A regional limb-fitting clinic at the West of Scotland Mobility and Rehabilitation Centre in Glasgow.
Thirty adults with transtibial amputations, recruited from a regional limb-fitting clinic. Of these 42% were cognitively impaired.
Random assignment to an errorless learning intervention (n = 15) or a treatment as usual control (n = 15). There were five training trials within a single session. Participants were then asked to fit their limb without assistance.
Performance was scored from videotape recording of the first occasion when the participant attempted to fit their limb without assistance. Addenbrookes Cognitive Examination-Revised (ACE-R) was used to assess general cognitive functioning.
The errorless learning group remembered more correct steps (mean 90.9, SD 12.1) than the control group (77.9; 8.4; P<0.001) and made fewer errors (mean 0.93, SD 1.3) than controls (2.1; 0.95); P =0.002).
Errorless learning can benefit people with amputations in learning the practical skill of fitting a prosthetic limb. Further study that includes follow-up is warranted.
无错误学习是一种有效的记忆障碍认知康复策略,但几乎没有证据支持其用于技能学习。本初步研究调查了在教授截肢者和血管性认知障碍的共病风险患者拟合假肢时,无错误学习是否优于常规治疗(试错)。
随机对照设计。
在格拉斯哥西苏格兰移动和康复中心的区域肢体适配诊所。
30 名经胫骨截肢者,从区域肢体适配诊所招募。其中 42%的人认知受损。
随机分配到无错误学习干预组(n = 15)或常规治疗对照组(n = 15)。在单次会议中进行了五次训练试验。然后,要求参与者在没有帮助的情况下自行适配肢体。
从参与者首次尝试在没有帮助的情况下适配肢体的录像带记录中对表现进行评分。使用 Addenbrookes 认知评估修订版(ACE-R)评估一般认知功能。
无错误学习组记住了更多正确步骤(平均值 90.9,标准差 12.1),而对照组为 77.9;8.4;P<0.001),错误更少(平均值 0.93,标准差 1.3)比对照组(2.1;0.95);P = 0.002)。
无错误学习可以使截肢者在学习拟合假肢的实际技能方面受益。需要进一步的包括随访的研究。