Ngo Adeline Su-Yin, Oh Jen Jen, Chen Yuming, Yong David, Ong Marcus Eng Hock
Department of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore 169608, Singapore.
Int J Emerg Med. 2009 Aug 11;2(3):155-60. doi: 10.1007/s12245-009-0116-9.
Intraosseous (IO) access is an alternative to conventional intravenous access.
We evaluate the use of the EZ-IO as an alternative vascular access for patients in the emergency department.
A non-randomized, prospective, observational study was performed in adults using the EZ-IO powered drill device.
Twenty-four patients were recruited. There were 35 intraosseous insertions, including 24 tibial and 11 humeral insertions. All EZ-IO insertions were achieved within 20 s and were successful at the first attempt except for one. Of the intraosseous insertions, 88.6% were reported to be easier than intravenous cannulation. We found flow rates to be significantly faster using a pressure bag. The seniority of operators did not affect the success of insertion. Complications included a glove being caught in the drill device and extravasation of fluid although they were easily preventable.
The use of the EZ-IO provides a fast, easy and reliable alternative mode of venous access, especially in the resuscitation of patients with no venous vascular access in the emergency department. Flow rates may be improved by the use of pressure bags.
骨内(IO)通路是传统静脉通路的一种替代方式。
我们评估使用EZ-IO作为急诊科患者的替代血管通路。
使用EZ-IO动力钻孔装置对成人进行了一项非随机、前瞻性观察性研究。
招募了24名患者。共进行了35次骨内穿刺,其中胫骨穿刺24次,肱骨穿刺11次。所有EZ-IO穿刺均在20秒内完成,除1次外均首次穿刺成功。在骨内穿刺中,88.6%的穿刺报告称比静脉置管更容易。我们发现使用压力袋时流速明显更快。操作者的资历不影响穿刺成功率。并发症包括手套被钻孔装置卡住和液体外渗,不过这些并发症很容易预防。
EZ-IO的使用提供了一种快速、简便且可靠的静脉通路替代方式,尤其是在急诊科对无静脉血管通路的患者进行复苏时。使用压力袋可能会提高流速。