Hinderer U T
Clínica Mirasierra de Cirugía Plástica-Estética, Madrid, Spain.
Clin Plast Surg. 1991 Jan;18(1):87-105.
The aesthetic surgery of the facial skeletal contour requires either the performance of ostectomies of excessively prominent segments or the augmentation of retruded segments with organic or synthetic material, in order to achieve balanced tridimensional relations of each segment with regard to the total facial unit. Craniomaxillofacial surgeries are necessary in major malformations or in those combined with malocclusion. In the nasal dorsum or tip, the author prefers the use of cartilage, because synthetic materials need adequate soft-tissue bulk for cover to be inserted without tension and absence of passive mobility of the reception site. For malar augmentation, first proposed by the author and independently by Spadafora in 1971, for chin augmentation up to 8 mm, and for augmentation of the mandibular angle, the author prefers silicone implants because they do not change in shape or volume, may be premanufactured or custom-made, have a similar consistency to that of bone, and do not support bacterial growth. On the other hand, autologous bone grafts adapt less to curved bony surfaces, have an erratic rate of resorption, and need an additional surgical step for removal with the corresponding morbidity and scar. Subperiosteal insertion is preferred because it confers greater stability and the cavity is easier to dissect without soft-tissue damage. Although bone erosion may occur, with over 1200 implants clinically no major change in the soft-tissue contour has been observed, nor has the author been consulted for late complication. In the malar region this may be due to the large surface of the implant and absence of muscular pressure. In the chin, an insertion over the site of the dental roots is avoided. For midface augmentation the following implants are used: (1) The premaxillary lower nasal base implant, proposed in 1971, is indicated to correct a concave midfacial profile, frequent in Asian, black, and Mestizo patients from Latin America and in Caucasian patients with maxillonasal dysplasia or Binder's syndrome, after trauma, with excessive septum and nasal spine resections, and in nasal-maxillary sequels in cleft patients. In case of dental malocclusion, orthognathic surgery is the technique of choice. A prototype implant is available in two sizes, to be inserted through a lateral incision at the base of the columella. In 108 patients two implants have been partially removed. After the first month the patient is usually well adapted to the foreign body.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
面部骨骼轮廓的美容手术需要对过度突出的部分进行截骨术,或使用有机或合成材料对面部后缩部分进行填充,以实现面部各部分与整个面部单元之间平衡的三维关系。颅颌面手术对于严重畸形或合并错牙合畸形的情况是必要的。在鼻背或鼻尖,作者更倾向于使用软骨,因为合成材料需要足够的软组织覆盖,以便在无张力且受植部位无被动移动的情况下植入。对于颧骨增高术(作者于1971年首次提出,斯帕达福拉于同年独立提出)、下巴增高8毫米及下颌角增高,作者更倾向于使用硅胶植入物,因为它们形状和体积不变,可预先制造或定制,质地与骨骼相似,且不支持细菌生长。另一方面,自体骨移植不太适合弯曲的骨表面,吸收速率不稳定,且需要额外的手术步骤来取出,相应地会带来发病率和疤痕问题。骨膜下植入更受青睐,因为它能提供更大的稳定性,且该腔隙更容易解剖而不损伤软组织。虽然可能会发生骨质侵蚀,但临床上超过1200例植入手术中,未观察到软组织轮廓有重大变化,作者也未接到晚期并发症的咨询。在颧骨区域,这可能是由于植入物表面积大且无肌肉压力。在下巴部位,应避免在牙根部位上方植入。对于中面部增高,使用以下植入物:(1)1971年提出的上颌前下部鼻基底植入物,适用于矫正中面部凹陷轮廓,这种情况常见于亚洲、黑人、拉丁美洲的混血患者以及患有上颌鼻发育不良或宾德综合征的白种患者、外伤后、鼻中隔和鼻嵴过度切除后的患者以及腭裂患者的鼻上颌后遗症患者。如果存在牙列不齐,正颌手术是首选技术。有一种原型植入物有两种尺寸,可通过鼻小柱基部的外侧切口插入。在108例患者中,有两枚植入物已部分取出。第一个月后,患者通常能很好地适应异物。(摘要截选至400字)