• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Where to look first for children's knowledge of false beliefs.

作者信息

Siegal M, Beattie K

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Australia.

出版信息

Cognition. 1991 Jan;38(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(91)90020-5.

DOI:10.1016/0010-0277(91)90020-5
PMID:2015753
Abstract

Recent research has shown that, although young children have a substantial knowledge of beliefs as internal mental states, they have considerable difficulty in understanding how a false belief can lead to an outcome which is in conflict with a desire. However, this evidence has come from tasks which assume that children follow an experimenter's "implicatures" in conversation and interpret the question "Where will a person (with the false belief) look for the object?" to mean "Where will the person look first?" rather than "Where will the person have to look (or go to look) to find the object?" In our investigation, even 3-year-olds often responded correctly when asked to predict the initial behavior of a story character with a false belief. We discuss these results in terms of the conversational worlds of children and adults.

摘要

相似文献

1
Where to look first for children's knowledge of false beliefs.
Cognition. 1991 Jan;38(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(91)90020-5.
2
Children's understanding of first- and third-person perspectives in complement clauses and false-belief tasks.儿童对补语从句和错误信念任务中第一人称与第三人称视角的理解。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2016 Nov;151:131-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2016.03.004. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
3
Processing Demands Impact 3-Year-Olds' Performance in a Spontaneous-Response Task: New Evidence for the Processing-Load Account of Early False-Belief Understanding.加工需求影响3岁儿童在自发反应任务中的表现:早期错误信念理解的加工负荷解释的新证据
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 12;10(11):e0142405. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142405. eCollection 2015.
4
Retrospective attribution of false beliefs in 3-year-old children.回溯性归因于 3 岁儿童的错误信念。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Nov 6;115(45):11477-11482. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1803505115. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
5
Chinese children's understanding of false beliefs: the role of language.中国儿童对错误信念的理解:语言的作用。
J Child Lang. 1999 Feb;26(1):1-21. doi: 10.1017/s0305000998003626.
6
Young children's attribution of action to beliefs and desires.幼儿对行为的信念和欲望归因
Child Dev. 1989 Aug;60(4):946-64.
7
Early False-Belief Understanding.早期错误信念理解。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2017 Apr;21(4):237-249. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.01.012. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
8
Mental files and belief: A cognitive theory of how children represent belief and its intensionality.心理档案与信念:关于儿童如何表征信念及其内涵性的认知理论。
Cognition. 2015 Dec;145:77-88. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.08.006. Epub 2015 Aug 29.
9
The relation between desire and false belief in children's theory of mind: no satisfaction?儿童心理理论中欲望与错误信念之间的关系:没有满足感吗?
Dev Psychol. 2003 Sep;39(5):859-76. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.39.5.859.
10
Young children's understanding of fact beliefs versus value beliefs.幼儿对事实信念与价值信念的理解。
Child Dev. 1990 Aug;61(4):915-28.

引用本文的文献

1
Why Do Children From Age 4 Fail True Belief Tasks? A Decision Experiment Testing Competence Versus Performance Limitation Accounts.为什么4岁儿童在真实信念任务中失败?一项测试能力与表现限制解释的决策实验。
Cogn Sci. 2025 Jun;49(6):e70069. doi: 10.1111/cogs.70069.
2
Verbal Perceptual Prompts Facilitate Children's Sensitivity to False Beliefs.言语感知提示有助于儿童对错误信念的敏感度。
J Intell. 2024 Jul 27;12(8):73. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12080073.
3
How do children overcome their pragmatic performance problems in the true belief task? The role of advanced pragmatics and higher-order theory of mind.
儿童如何克服真信念任务中的语用表现问题?高级语用和高阶心理理论的作用。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 27;17(4):e0266959. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266959. eCollection 2022.
4
Why Do Children Who Solve False Belief Tasks Begin to Find True Belief Control Tasks Difficult? A Test of Pragmatic Performance Factors in Theory of Mind Tasks.为什么能够解决错误信念任务的儿童开始觉得真实信念控制任务困难?一项对心理理论任务中语用表现因素的测试。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 14;12:797246. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.797246. eCollection 2021.
5
Do complement clauses really support false-belief reasoning? A longitudinal study with English-speaking 2- to 3-year-olds.补语从句真的支持错误信念推理吗?一项针对英语 2 至 3 岁儿童的纵向研究。
Dev Psychol. 2021 Aug;57(8):1210-1227. doi: 10.1037/dev0001012.
6
Perceptual Access Reasoning (PAR) in Developing a Representational Theory of Mind.发展心理表象理论的知觉访问推理 (PAR)。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2021 Sep;86(3):7-154. doi: 10.1111/mono.12432.
7
Case Report: Theory of Mind and Figurative Language in a Child With Agenesis of the Corpus Callosum.病例报告:一名胼胝体发育不全儿童的心理理论与比喻性语言
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 10;11:596804. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.596804. eCollection 2020.
8
Are the classic false belief tasks cursed? Young children are just as likely as older children to pass a false belief task when they are not required to overcome the curse of knowledge.经典错误信念任务是否受到诅咒?当不需要克服知识诅咒时,年幼的儿童和年长的儿童一样有可能通过错误信念任务。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 19;16(2):e0244141. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244141. eCollection 2021.
9
Pragmatics in the False-Belief Task: Let the Robot Ask the Question!错误信念任务中的语用学:让机器人提问!
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 23;11:593807. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.593807. eCollection 2020.
10
Reply to Rubio-Fernández et al.: Different traditional false-belief tasks impose different processing demands for toddlers.回复鲁维奥 - 费尔南德斯等人:不同的传统错误信念任务对幼儿施加了不同的处理要求。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 May 9;114(19):E3751-E3752. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1703665114. Epub 2017 Apr 17.