Oncological Surgery of First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011 Jan;283(1):103-8. doi: 10.1007/s00404-010-1385-5. Epub 2010 Feb 16.
The objectives of this review are to compare the effectiveness and safety of radiochemotherapy (RTCT) with radiotherapy (RT) alone in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC).
We comprehensively searched the Cochrane library, Medline, EMBASE, Chinese biomedicine literature database, Chinese scientific full-text database and Chinese journal full-text database for relevant articles. The computer search was supplemented with a manual search of reference lists for all available review articles. Also reference lists of the included studies were reviewed.
We included 18 randomized trials involving 3,517 patients. Meta-analysis results are as follows: the response rate, 3 and 5-year survival rates were significantly better in patients in the RTCT group than in RT group. As adverse effects, limited evidence suggests that there was no significant difference between the two groups with regard to rectitis, cystitis, nausea and vomiting. But RTCT group has higher incidence rates than RT group in gastrointestinal, myelosuppression and leucopenia.
The combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy was more effective for LACC than radiotherapy alone. There was no significant difference between the RTCT regimen group and RT regimen group with regard to adverse effects.
本综述的目的是比较局部晚期宫颈癌(LACC)患者中放化疗(RTCT)与单纯放疗(RT)的疗效和安全性。
我们全面检索了 Cochrane 图书馆、Medline、EMBASE、中国生物医学文献数据库、中国科学全文数据库和中国期刊全文数据库,以获取相关文章。计算机检索补充了对所有现有综述文章的参考文献列表的手动检索。还对纳入研究的参考文献列表进行了审查。
我们纳入了 18 项随机试验,涉及 3517 名患者。荟萃分析结果如下:在 RTCT 组中,患者的反应率、3 年和 5 年生存率明显高于 RT 组。至于不良反应,有限的证据表明,两组之间在直肠炎、膀胱炎、恶心和呕吐方面没有显著差异。但是,与 RT 组相比,RTCT 组胃肠道、骨髓抑制和白细胞减少的发生率更高。
与单纯放疗相比,放疗联合化疗对 LACC 更有效。在不良反应方面,RTCT 方案组与 RT 方案组之间无显著差异。