Irnich W, Krämer E, Müller R
Institut für Medizinische Technik, Universität Giessen.
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1991 Apr 19;116(16):601-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1063654.
To test the extent and quality of pacemaker programming, 340 programmable pacemakers were selected out of 1,204 impulse generators removed post-mortem. Their actual program was compared with the nominal parameters when first delivered. 177 (52.1%) of the 340 pacemakers still had the same parameters as on delivery. The multiply programmable impulse generators with telemetry were more frequently programmed (61.2%) than the simple programmable ones (43.0%) or the multiply programmable ones without telemetry (43.7%). Rate was the most frequently programmed parameter, followed by impulse amplitude, sensitivity and impulse duration. Refractory time and hysteresis were only rarely changed from the initial state. Apparently, programmability was not thought to be important enough. Programming without telemetry was seemingly too complicated. The reasons for this attitude should be investigated so that the discrepancy between wishes and reality can be overcome.
为测试起搏器程控的范围和质量,从1204个死后取出的脉冲发生器中挑选出340个可编程起搏器。将其实际程控与首次交付时的标称参数进行比较。340个起搏器中有177个(52.1%)仍具有与交付时相同的参数。带有遥测功能的多重可编程脉冲发生器的程控频率(61.2%)高于简单可编程脉冲发生器(43.0%)或无遥测功能的多重可编程脉冲发生器(43.7%)。心率是最常程控的参数,其次是脉冲幅度、灵敏度和脉冲持续时间。不应期和滞后很少从初始状态改变。显然,人们认为程控的重要性不够。无遥测功能的程控似乎过于复杂。应调查这种态度的原因,以便克服愿望与现实之间的差异。