Tack Sylvie
Ghent University, Faculty of Law, Ghent, Belgium.
Med Law. 2009 Dec;28(4):725-38.
Nowadays, health care institutions develop policies on how to deal with medical decisions concerning the patients' end-of-life stage (hereafter: "end-of-life decision policies" or "ELD-policies"). This evolution is not only noticeable in hospitals, but also in nursing homes, residential facilities for the disabled and home care services. However, these policies raise several legal issues. The developing and implementing of institutional ELD-policies are legitimated as such and imposing additional criteria or limitations on patients or physicians are allowed if all patients' rights are respected. Due to many differences in form and content, their legal value is difficult to define. Nevertheless, institutional ELD-policies are only enforceable on physicians after incorporation into a binding agreement and without violation of their (deontological and/or legal) right to professional autonomy. Patients (or their legal representatives) can never obligate physicians or health care institutions to comply with institutional ELD-policies, unless enforceable patients' rights are violated.
如今,医疗机构制定了关于如何处理涉及患者临终阶段医疗决策的政策(以下简称:“临终决策政策”或“ELD政策”)。这种演变不仅在医院中很明显,在养老院、残疾人居住设施和家庭护理服务中也很明显。然而,这些政策引发了一些法律问题。机构ELD政策的制定和实施本身是合法的,如果尊重所有患者的权利,对患者或医生施加额外的标准或限制也是允许的。由于形式和内容存在许多差异,其法律价值难以界定。尽管如此,机构ELD政策只有在纳入具有约束力的协议且不侵犯医生的职业自主权(道义和/或法律)权利后,才能对医生强制执行。患者(或其法定代表人)永远不能强迫医生或医疗机构遵守机构ELD政策,除非可执行的患者权利受到侵犯。