Suppr超能文献

[安乐死及临终时的其他决策(关于更清晰术语的提议及对医疗法律框架的一些思考)]

[Euthanasia and other decisions at the end of life (Proposal for a more transparent terminology and some thoughts on the legal framework of medical treatment)].

作者信息

Vadász Gábor

出版信息

Orv Hetil. 2010 Oct 24;151(43):1769-75. doi: 10.1556/OH.2010.28954.

Abstract

Indication of euthanasia is only one of several medical decisions at the end of life. Precise definition of this topic related to the clinical events happening around the sick-bed is not complete in the legal and medical literature. The present review attempts to classify the different end of life events with the aim of clarifying which of these do not belong to the concept of passive euthanasia. Euthanasia is not a legal category. The everyday expressions of active and passive euthanasia are simplifications, which cover actions of different purposes. Use of these in medical and legal literature can be confusing and misleading. We differentiate decisions at the end of life on basis of their purpose. Based on the definition and category of the Hungarian Doctors' Chamber, euthanasia is the act or the lack of action in order to mercifully shorten or end the life of a suffering fellow-man to help him. Concepts of active, passive and forced euthanasia are defined. The terms of indirect and intermediate euthanasia are not used in order to avoid misunderstanding. Help and participation of non-professionals in the implementation cannot be completely excluded from the concept of euthanasia, and we believe euthanasia is not merely related to doctors. We outline those medical decisions at the end of life which do not belong to the category of passive euthanasia, namely: withdrawal of ineffective and life sustaining treatments, letting go of the patient, contra-indication of therapy escalation, use of palliative therapy, pain-relieving treatment, compromise medicine, consideration of reanimation and choosing cost-effective therapy. We touch upon the subject of the living will, why it cannot be applied, and its relation to active and passive euthanasia. With reference to the legal regulation of life saving and life sustaining treatment, we deal with the expected spirit of medical legislation.

摘要

安乐死的指征只是临终时众多医疗决策之一。法律和医学文献中,与病床边发生的临床事件相关的这一主题的确切定义并不完整。本综述试图对不同的临终事件进行分类,目的是厘清其中哪些不属于被动安乐死的概念。安乐死并非一个法律范畴。主动安乐死和被动安乐死这些日常表述是简化说法,涵盖了不同目的的行为。在医学和法律文献中使用这些表述可能会造成混淆和误导。我们根据目的对临终决策进行区分。根据匈牙利医生协会的定义和分类,安乐死是为了仁慈地缩短或结束一位受苦同胞的生命以帮助他而采取的行为或不作为。定义了主动、被动和强迫安乐死的概念。不使用间接安乐死和中间安乐死这些术语以避免误解。非专业人员在实施安乐死过程中的帮助和参与不能完全排除在安乐死概念之外,而且我们认为安乐死不仅仅与医生有关。我们概述了那些不属于被动安乐死范畴的临终医疗决策,即:撤销无效的维持生命治疗、放弃患者、治疗升级的禁忌、使用姑息治疗、止痛治疗、妥协医学、考虑复苏以及选择性价比高的治疗。我们探讨了生前预嘱的问题,它为何无法应用,以及它与主动安乐死和被动安乐死的关系。参照关于救命和维持生命治疗的法律规定,我们论述了医疗立法的预期精神。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验