School of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Drug Saf. 2010 Mar 1;33(3):245-55. doi: 10.2165/11319050-000000000-00000.
Little is known about how community pharmacists make decisions about which over-the-counter (OTC) medication to supply to a patient and the role of clinical evidence in making those decisions.
To explore factors that influence product selection by the pharmacist and the role of evidence-based practice in this decision.
In this qualitative study, community pharmacists registered in Northern Ireland and recruited via advertising and various qualitative sampling techniques, participated in face-to-face, semi-structured interviews (June 2007-September 2007) to discuss issues around OTC medication, including the use of evidence, how they judged a product to be effective, and their views on evidence-based medicine and its application to OTC medication. All interviews were digitally recorded, fully transcribed and analysed using the principles of constant comparison.
Twenty-six pharmacists participated in interviews. Safety was the over-arching consideration for pharmacists when making decisions. The subordinate themes were product, patient and professional factors. In terms of the product subordinate theme, use or consideration of evidence was secondary in the selection of OTC medicines. Pharmacists considered the potential for harm in the first instance and if the product was deemed safe, although lacking any evidence for effectiveness, the product was supplied. In relation to patient factors, it emerged that pharmacists were influenced by patient demand for a particular OTC product and wanted to meet patient expectations, provided that the requested product was judged to be safe. Similarly, professional factors such as ethical considerations (primarily in relation to safety) and respecting patient choice also influenced decision making. However, pharmacists recognized the conflict between professional requirements to practise according to evidence-based principles and patient demands.
This study suggests that pharmacists considered safety above all other factors when recommending OTC products to patients, and evidence of effectiveness was seldom considered when selling OTC medicines. If evidence-based practice is to influence this type of decision, pharmacists need to use the evidence that is available and be prepared to discuss evidence with patients.
对于社区药剂师如何决定向患者提供哪种非处方(OTC)药物,以及临床证据在做出这些决定中的作用,人们知之甚少。
探讨影响药剂师选择产品的因素以及循证实践在这一决策中的作用。
在这项定性研究中,通过广告和各种定性抽样技术在北爱尔兰注册的社区药剂师参与了面对面的半结构化访谈(2007 年 6 月至 2007 年 9 月),讨论了 OTC 药物的相关问题,包括证据的使用、他们如何判断产品是否有效,以及他们对循证医学及其在 OTC 药物应用方面的看法。所有访谈均进行了数字记录、完整转录,并使用不断比较的原则进行分析。
26 名药剂师参加了访谈。在做出决策时,安全性是药剂师考虑的首要因素。下属主题是产品、患者和专业因素。就产品下属主题而言,在选择 OTC 药物时,对证据的使用或考虑是次要的。药剂师首先考虑潜在的危害,如果产品被认为是安全的,尽管缺乏任何有效性的证据,该产品仍将被供应。关于患者因素,研究结果表明,药剂师受到患者对特定 OTC 产品需求的影响,并希望满足患者的期望,前提是所要求的产品被认为是安全的。同样,专业因素,如伦理考虑(主要与安全性有关)和尊重患者选择,也会影响决策。然而,药剂师认识到在根据循证原则实践和患者需求之间存在冲突。
本研究表明,药剂师在向患者推荐 OTC 产品时,首先考虑安全性,而在销售 OTC 药物时很少考虑有效性证据。如果循证实践要影响这种类型的决策,药剂师需要使用现有的证据,并准备与患者讨论证据。