Addiction and Family Research Group, Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Rochester, NY 14642, USA.
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2010 Feb;18(1):87-98. doi: 10.1037/a0018058.
The purpose of this study was to examine the comparative efficacy of cognitive rehabilitation as an intervention for substance misuse. Patients with substance use disorders entering long-term residential care (N = 160) were randomly assigned to one of two conditions: (a) standard treatment plus computer-assisted cognitive rehabilitation (CACR), which was designed to improve cognitive performance in areas such as problem solving, attention, memory, and information processing speed; and (b) an equally intensive attention control condition consisting of standard treatment plus a computer-assisted typing tutorial (CATT). Participants were assessed at baseline, during treatment, at treatment completion, and 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-month follow-up. Intent-to-treat analyses showed that, compared with those randomized to CATT, patients who received CACR were significantly more engaged in treatment (e.g., higher ratings of positive participation by treatment staff, higher ratings of therapeutic alliance), more committed to treatment (e.g., longer stays in residence) and reported better long-term outcomes (e.g., higher percentage of days abstinent after treatment). Mediational analyses revealed the positive comparative effect of CACR on abstinence during the year after treatment was mediated by treatment engagement and length of stay in residence.
本研究旨在考察认知康复作为一种干预措施对物质滥用的比较疗效。进入长期住宿护理的物质使用障碍患者(N=160)被随机分配到以下两种条件之一:(a)标准治疗加计算机辅助认知康复(CACR),旨在提高解决问题、注意力、记忆和信息处理速度等方面的认知表现;(b)由标准治疗加计算机辅助打字教程(CATT)组成的同等密集注意力控制条件。参与者在基线、治疗期间、治疗结束时以及 3、6、9 和 12 个月的随访时进行评估。意向治疗分析表明,与随机分配到 CATT 的患者相比,接受 CACR 的患者在治疗中更投入(例如,治疗人员的积极参与评分更高,治疗联盟评分更高),对治疗更投入(例如,在居住期间停留时间更长),并且报告了更好的长期结果(例如,治疗后戒断的天数百分比更高)。中介分析表明,CACR 对治疗后一年戒断的积极比较效果是通过治疗参与度和居住时间的长短来介导的。