Department of Surgery, University of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, 23538 Lübeck, Germany.
Eur J Med Res. 2010 Jan 29;15(1):25-30. doi: 10.1186/2047-783x-15-1-25.
Postoperative surveillance after curative resection for colorectal cancer has been demonstrated to improve survival. It remains unknown however, whether intensified surveillance provides a significant benefit regarding outcome and survival. This study was aimed at comparing different surveillance strategies regarding their effect on long-term outcome.
Between 1990 and 2006, all curative resections for colorectal cancer were selected from our prospective colorectal cancer database. All patients were offered to follow our institution's surveillance program according to the ASCO guidelines. We defined surveillance as "intensive" in cases where >70% appointments were attended and the program was completed. As "minimal" we defined surveillance with <70% of the appointments attended and an incomplete program. As "none" we defined the group which did not take part in any surveillance.
Out of 1469 patients 858 patients underwent "intensive", 297 "minimal" and 314 "none" surveillance. The three groups were well balanced regarding biographical data and tumor characteristics. The 5-year survival rates were 79% (intensive), 76% (minimal) and 54% (none) (OR 1.480, (95% CI 1.135-1.929); p <0.0001), respectively. The 10-year survival rates were 65% (intensive), 50% (minimal) and 31% (none) (p <0.0001), respectively. With a median follow-up of 70 months the median time of survival was 191 months (intensive), 116 months (minimal) and 66 months (none) (p <0.0001). After recurrence, the 5-year survival rates were 32% (intensive, p = 0.034), 13% (minimal, p = 0.001) and 19% (none, p = 0.614). The median time of survival after recurrence was 31 months (intensive, p <0.0001), 21 months (minimal, p <0.0001) and 16 month (none, p <0.0001) respectively.
Intensive surveillance after curative resection of colorectal cancer improves survival. In cases of recurrent disease, intensive surveillance has a positive impact on patients' prognosis. Large randomized, multicenter trials are needed to substantiate these results.
结直肠癌根治术后的术后监测已被证明可以提高生存率。然而,目前尚不清楚强化监测在预后和生存方面是否有显著获益。本研究旨在比较不同监测策略对长期预后的影响。
本研究纳入了我们前瞻性结直肠癌数据库中 1990 年至 2006 年间所有接受结直肠癌根治性切除术的患者。所有患者均根据 ASCO 指南接受我们机构的监测计划。我们将监测定义为在 70%以上的预约中进行并完成该计划为“强化”,将 70%以下的预约中进行且计划不完整定义为“最低”,而未参加任何监测的患者定义为“无”。
在 1469 例患者中,858 例患者接受了“强化”监测,297 例患者接受了“最低”监测,314 例患者未接受任何监测。三组患者的人口统计学资料和肿瘤特征均无差异。5 年生存率分别为 79%(强化组)、76%(最低组)和 54%(无组)(OR 1.480,95%CI 1.135-1.929;p <0.0001)。10 年生存率分别为 65%(强化组)、50%(最低组)和 31%(无组)(p <0.0001)。中位随访 70 个月时,中位生存时间分别为 191 个月(强化组)、116 个月(最低组)和 66 个月(无组)(p <0.0001)。复发后 5 年生存率分别为 32%(强化组,p = 0.034)、13%(最低组,p = 0.001)和 19%(无组,p = 0.614)。复发后中位生存时间分别为 31 个月(强化组,p <0.0001)、21 个月(最低组,p <0.0001)和 16 个月(无组,p <0.0001)。
结直肠癌根治术后强化监测可提高生存率。在出现复发的情况下,强化监测对患者的预后有积极影响。需要进行大规模的随机、多中心试验来证实这些结果。