Department of General-, Visceral- and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Essen, 45122 Essen, Germany.
Eur J Med Res. 2010 Jan 29;15(1):31-4. doi: 10.1186/2047-783x-15-1-31.
Due to organ shortage, average waiting time for a kidney in Germany is about 4 years after start of dialysis. Number of kidney grafts recovered can only be maintained by accepting older and expanded criteria donors. The aim of this study was to analyse the impact of donor and recipient risk on kidney long-term function.
All deceased kidney transplantations were considered. We retrospectively studied 332 patients between 2002 and 2006; divided in 4 groups reflecting donor and recipient risk.
Non-marginal recipients were less likely to receive a marginal organ (69 of 207, 33%) as compared to marginal recipients, of whom two-thirds received a marginal organ (p<0.0001). Graft function significantly differed between the groups, but detrimental effect of marginal recipient status on eGFR after 12 months (-6 ml/min/1.73qm, 95% CI -2 to -9) was clearly smaller than the effect of marginal donor status (-10 ml/min/1.73qm, 95% CI -7 to -14).
As we were able to show expanded criteria donor has a far bigger effect on long-term graft function than the "extra risk" recipient. Although there have been attempts to define groups of recipients who should be offered ECD kidneys primarily the discussion is still ongoing.
由于器官短缺,德国开始透析后,平均等待肾脏的时间约为 4 年。只能通过接受年龄较大和扩大标准的供体来维持可回收的肾脏移植数量。本研究旨在分析供体和受者风险对肾脏长期功能的影响。
考虑到所有的死亡肾脏移植。我们回顾性地研究了 2002 年至 2006 年间的 332 名患者;分为 4 组,反映供体和受者的风险。
非边缘受者接受边缘供体的可能性较小(207 例中的 69 例,33%),而边缘受者中三分之二接受了边缘供体(p<0.0001)。各组间的移植物功能明显不同,但边缘受者状态对 eGFR 的不利影响在 12 个月后(-6 ml/min/1.73qm,95%CI-2 至-9)明显小于边缘供体状态的影响(-10 ml/min/1.73qm,95%CI-7 至-14)。
正如我们所表明的,扩展标准的供体对长期移植物功能的影响远远大于“额外风险”的受者。尽管已经尝试定义应主要提供 ECD 肾脏的受者群体,但讨论仍在继续。