McGuckin R S, Tao L, Thompson W O, Pashley D H
University of Texas Dental Branch, Houston.
Dent Mater. 1991 Jan;7(1):50-3. doi: 10.1016/0109-5641(91)90027-v.
The shear bond strengths of Scotchbond, HEMA/Scotchbond, and Scotchbond 2 were measured in vivo in dog canine and molar enamel and dentin. Dentin bond strengths were compared in superficial, middle, and deep dentin. The acid-etched enamel bond strengths of the three bonding systems ranged from 10 to 11 MPa and were not statistically different. Scotchbond/Silux bonds to superficial and middle cuspid and molar dentin were 3 MPa and were not statistically different. HEMA-treated dentin did not consistently improve Scotchbond strengths to either tooth type at any dentin depth. Deep dentin from either tooth type yielded significantly lower bond strengths. Scotchbond 2/Silux shear bond strengths were significantly higher (6-8 MPa) in superficial and middle cuspid dentin but were not different from Scotchbond bonds made to deep cuspid dentin or to any depth of molar dentin. The observation that molar bond strengths are lower than those made to cuspid dentin indicates that there are important substrate differences between teeth as well as within dentin as a function of depth. The dog model may be useful for the screening of new dentin bonding systems prior to clinical trials.
在犬的犬齿和磨牙的牙釉质及牙本质上对Scotchbond、甲基丙烯酸羟乙酯/Scotchbond和Scotchbond 2的剪切粘结强度进行了体内测量。比较了表层、中层和深层牙本质的牙本质粘结强度。三种粘结系统的酸蚀牙釉质粘结强度在10至11兆帕之间,无统计学差异。Scotchbond/Silux与表层和中层犬齿及磨牙牙本质的粘结强度为3兆帕,无统计学差异。在任何牙本质深度,经甲基丙烯酸羟乙酯处理的牙本质均未持续提高Scotchbond与任何一种牙齿类型的粘结强度。两种牙齿类型的深层牙本质产生的粘结强度均显著较低。Scotchbond 2/Silux在表层和中层犬齿牙本质中的剪切粘结强度显著较高(6 - 8兆帕),但与Scotchbond与深层犬齿牙本质或磨牙牙本质任何深度的粘结强度无差异。磨牙粘结强度低于犬齿牙本质粘结强度这一观察结果表明,不同牙齿之间以及牙本质内部随深度存在重要的底物差异。犬模型可能有助于在临床试验前筛选新的牙本质粘结系统。